Journal of Nanotechnology / 2011 / Article / Tab 3

Research Article

Photocatalytic Properties of Tin Oxide and Antimony-Doped Tin Oxide Nanoparticles

Table 3

(a) 𝐑 m a x 1 6 3 7 , 𝐑 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 , 𝐊 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 , and Ξ¦ 𝝀 / Ξ¦ πŸ‘ 𝟏 πŸ“ measured at 1637 cmβˆ’1 using different wavelengths of irradiation (Ξ»). Sb doping: 7%.a, b (b) 𝐑 βˆ— i n i , 𝐊 βˆ— i n i , 𝐊 βˆ— i n i / 𝐊 βˆ— m a x and 𝐊 βˆ— i n i / 𝐊 βˆ— i n i measured at 1637 cmβˆ’1, and 1620 cmβˆ’1 using different wavelengths of irradiation (Ξ»). Sb doping: 7%.a, b (c) 𝐑 βˆ— i n i and 𝐊 βˆ— i n i measured at 1637 cmβˆ’1 and 1620 cmβˆ’1 different wavelengths of irradiation (Ξ»). Sb doping: 0%.a, b
(a)

Ξ»[nm] 𝑅 m a x 1 6 3 7 [mol mβˆ’3 sβˆ’1] 𝑅 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 [mol mβˆ’3 sβˆ’1] 𝐾 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 [m 3/2 sβˆ’1/2 Jβˆ’1/2] Ξ¦ πœ† / Ξ¦ 3 1 5

3153.04.2 3 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 1
3650.650.65 1 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.4
4080.0250.025 0 . 0 4 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.01
5450.0350.033 0 . 0 7 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.02
6500.0810.23 1 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.3

aMPS/Sb : SnO2= 0.19 g/g; 𝑐 p a r t i c l e = 1 0 vol.%.
b 𝑅 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 values are 𝑅 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 values corrected for differences in 𝐼 0 , and these 𝑅 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 values are within experimental error equal to 𝑅 βˆ— m a x 1 6 2 0 . The 𝐾 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 values were calculated from the 𝑅 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 values.
(b)

πœ† [nm] 𝑅 βˆ— i n i 1 6 3 7 [mol mβˆ’3 sβˆ’1] 𝑅 βˆ— i n i 1 6 2 0 [mol mβˆ’3 sβˆ’1] 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 3 7 [m 3/2 sβˆ’1/2 Jβˆ’1/2] 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 2 0 [m 3/2 sβˆ’1/2 Jβˆ’1/2] 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 3 7 / 𝐾 βˆ— m a x 1 6 3 7 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 3 7 / 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 2 0

3152.581.50 2 . 0 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 1 . 0 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.51.5
3650.470.39 0 . 5 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0 . 3 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.61.5
4080.0230.015 0 . 0 3 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0 . 0 2 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.71.5
5450.0230.015 0 . 0 4 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0 . 0 3 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.61.3
6500.1800.132 0 . 6 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0 . 4 4 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0.61.4

aMPS/Sb : SnO2= 0.19 g/g; 𝑐 p a r t i c l e = 10 vol%.
bThe 𝐾 m a x 1 6 3 7 values used are shown in Table 3(a). The 𝐾 βˆ— i n i corrected for differences in 𝐼 0 . The values 𝐾 βˆ— i n i were calculated from the corresponding 𝑅 βˆ— i n i values.
(c)

πœ† [nm] 𝑅 βˆ— i n i 1 6 3 7 [mol mβˆ’3 sβˆ’1] 𝑅 βˆ— i n i 1 6 2 0 [mol mβˆ’3 sβˆ’1] 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 3 7 [mol mβˆ’3/2 sβˆ’1/2] 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 2 0 [mol mβˆ’3/2 sβˆ’1/2 Jβˆ’1/2] 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 3 7 / 𝐾 βˆ— i n i 1 6 2 0

3156.43.5 3 . 4 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 1 . 9 0 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 1.8
3650.390.21 0 . 7 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0 . 4 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 1.9
4080.0160.0081 0 . 0 4 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0 . 0 2 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 2.0
5450.0610.037 0 . 2 6 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 0 . 1 6 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 1.7
6500.310.23 6 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 4 Γ— 1 0 βˆ’ 4 1.5

aMPS/Sb : SnO2 = 0.19 g/g; 𝑐 p a r t i c l e = 1 0 vol%.
bThe 𝑅 βˆ— i n i are 𝑅 i n i values corrected for differences in 𝐼 0 . The 𝐾 βˆ— i n i values and 𝐾 βˆ— i n i ratios were calculated from the corresponding 𝑅 βˆ— i n i values shown.