Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanotechnology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5175462, 7 pages
Research Article

Nanocrystalline Axially Bridged Iron Phthalocyanine Polymeric Conductor: (-Thiocyanato)(phthalocyaninato)iron(III)

1Department of Chemistry, College of Science, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila, Philippines
2Department of Physics, College of Science, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila, Philippines
3Materials Science and Nanotechnology Unit, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila, Philippines

Received 10 June 2016; Revised 12 August 2016; Accepted 21 August 2016

Academic Editor: Carlos R. Cabrera

Copyright © 2016 Eiza Shimizu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Skewered Iron(III) phthalocyanine conducting polymer can be constructed with the utilization of axial thiocyanato ligands ((-thiocyanato)(phthalocyaninato)iron(III)); () thereby creating additional avenues for electron transport through a linear SCN bridge, apart from the intermolecular orbital overlap between the Pc molecules. In this paper, we report on the conversion of bulk polymeric organic conductor into crystalline nanostructures through horizontal vapor phase growth process. The needle-like nanostructures are deemed to provide more ordered and, thus, more interactive interskewer polymer orientation, resulting in a twofold increase of its electrical conductivity per materials density unit.

1. Introduction

Phthalocyanines (Pc; Scheme 1) with metal centers (MPc) are considered to be one of the most promising organic conductors because of its flat and fully conjugated structure that provides facile intramolecular π-electron delocalization. Furthermore, the face-to-face stacking of MPcs paves the way for intermolecular -electron overlap, leading to intermolecular electron transport [1].

Scheme 1: Structure of phthalocyanine (Pc).

The versatility of MPc as building blocks for molecular conductors can further be utilized through the attachment of axial ligands to its metal center (octahedral) which would result in either slip-stacked arrangement [2] or a “shish-kebab” polymeric form [35]. The electrical conduction of slip-stacked MPc units highly depends on its arrangement in solid-state which is mainly due to the effectiveness of its intermolecular orbital overlap/interaction (Scheme 2(a)) [6, 7], while the polymerization of MPcL2 through axial-ligand (bidentate) bridge extends the highly delocalized π-electron of the macrocycle by forming linear π-electron containing organic molecules, resulting in additional stacking dimension for the π-electron transport, and thereby minimizing dependence on solid-state orientation (Scheme 2(b)) [8]. Furthermore, the introduction of a bridging ligand not only improves the geometry of the Pc’s leading to an increase of electrical conductivity but also induces a doping effect and modulation of electron transport due to ligand field effect, wherein electron delocalization is inversely proportional to the axial/bridging ligand energy [9]. Thus, polymerization through the linear and relatively low-energy SCN axial/bridging ligands extends the molecule’s π system by creating linear conduction pathway through the Fe-SCN-Fe spine.

Scheme 2: (a) Slip-stacked and (b) skewered axially ligated MPc architectures.

Nanosynthesis of bulk Pcs was shown to increase the electrical conductivity of molecules [10]. In a recent study, FePc was converted into nanostructure via the newly developed horizontal vapor phase growth (HVPG) technique [10, 11]. The nano-FePc was found to have twice the conductivity of the bulk FePc [10]. Nanosynthesis of FePc makes the adjacent Pcs more closely packed and have orderly solid-state arrangement, making the electrons freely move thereby creating efficient electronic transport systems [12, 13].

In this study, we explore on the possibility of further increasing the electrical conductivity of the polymeric system through its conversion into nanostructures. Bulk is synthesized by first oxidizing Fe2+ to Fe3+ to enable octahedral configuration thereby resulting in diaxial ligation. The oxidation is done with the reaction of (Pc) with SOCl2 to produce a highly oxidized (Pc)Cl2 radical. (Pc)Cl2 is reacted with KSCN to produce the soluble K[(Pc)(SCN)2] salt. Polymeric is synthesized by suspension of K[(Pc)(SCN)2] in water and heating the solution to 95°C to initiate polymerization. polymer is converted to nanoscale structures by horizontal vapor phase growth (HVPG) technique. Molecular characterizations are done by UV-Vis spectroscopy and FT-IR spectroscopy analyses, while the morphological images were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), elemental composition is analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX), and the electrical conductivity is measured using van der Pauw (4-probe) method.

The resulting nanostructured provide multidimensional π-electron transport in the Pc molecule by adopting the enforced tetragonal packing that further increases the stacking dimensionality by producing intra- and inter- (skewer) -orbital interactions (Scheme 3), thus, the higher electrical conductivity. This technique may serve as a facile and convenient method for increasing the conductivity of organic polymers with similar linear architectures, for which it may be considered as a promising class of molecular conductor.

Scheme 3: Multidimensional electron conduction in .

2. Methodology

2.1. Synthesis of Fe(Pc)Cl2

The synthesis of dichloro(phthalocyaninato)iron(II) [Fe(Pc)Cl2] was done through a previously reported procedure [14]. FePc (2.84 grams, 5 mmol) was suspended in 50 mL nitrobenzene. Then, 5.07 mL (70.0 mmol) thionyl chloride, SOCl2, was subsequently added to the reaction vessel. The mixture was refluxed at 70°C in N2 atmosphere for 3 hours with constant stirring. Then, the mixture was cooled and filtered and the blue-black product was washed with ethanol and allowed to dry. The reaction yielded 2.493 grams of product (78% yield).

2.2. Synthesis of K[FeIIIPc(SCN)2]

K[(Pc)(SCN)2] was synthesized using a reported procedure [15]. (Pc)Cl2 (1.92 grams, 3.0 mmol) was added to 6.03 grams (62 mmol) potassium thiocyanate, KSCN. Then, 100 mL acetone was added and the mixture was stirred for 72 hours at room temperature in N2 atmosphere. The thick suspension was vacuum filtered and was washed with cold distilled water and ethanol. The reaction yielded 1.39 grams of dark blue powder (64% yield).

2.3. Synthesis of [FeIII(Pc)(SCN)]n

was synthesized using a previously reported bridged MPc polymerization method [15, 16]. K[(Pc)(SCN)2] (0.28 grams, 0.3869 mmol) was suspended in 140 mL distilled water and was refluxed at 95°C with constant stirring for 14 days. This produced a green-black suspension and was filtered through gravity filtration. The reaction yielded 0.115 grams of black powder (47% yield).

2.4. Characterization

FePc, K[(Pc)(SCN)2], and were analyzed using (a) UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-2900), (b) FT-IR Spectrophotometer (Nicolet Magna-IR 550), and (c) EDX (Oxford ISIS). For the UV-Vis analysis, 20 ppm FePc and K[(Pc)(SCN)2] were prepared by dissolving 10 mg each of the sample in 50.0 mL DMF. The UV-Vis Spectrophotometer was set at wavelength scan ( to 900 nm), and their corresponding were recorded. For the IR profile of K[(Pc)(SCN)2] and , pelletized sample was run from 400 to 4000 cm−1. For the EDX analysis, sample was coated with gold (20 mm for 30 seconds) and was placed inside the SEM sample holder. The EDX analysis is used in conjunction with SEM. Thus, through the SEM (JEOL 5310), the surface of the sample was first viewed, and a flat, uniform smooth surface was chosen for the EDX analysis.

2.5. Nanostructure Synthesis

The HVPG technique employed 10-inch silica oven heating tubes and silicone O-rings for the vacuum sealing and nanostructure synthesis. An oxygen-fuel torch was used to seal the tubes, while the Thermionics Vacuum System was used as vacuum. The baking was done in a conventional tube furnace [11] at 400°C for 4 hours. A representative visible deposit from the baked tubes was obtained and chemically characterized with UV and IR analyses by using the same sample preparation and instrumental conditions used in its bulk counterpart. Then, its morphology was analyzed using SEM and the elemental analysis by EDX. A representative piece of silica tube with visible deposit was obtained and placed in a gold stage plate and the same sample preparation and instrument conditions used by its bulk counterpart were also applied to the baked sample.

2.6. Electrical Resistivity

The set-up for the van der Pauw (4-probe) method [17] for the conductivity measurement includes Lodestar PS-303 DC power supply, switch board, Fluke 115 digital multimeter, and Keithley 224 programmable current source (range: 5 nA–100 mA).

The electrical resistance of K[(Pc)(SCN)2], , and nano- were measured. The samples (0.60 g) were compressed into pellet using a hydraulic press (103 psi) that produced approximately 5 mm diameter homogenous pellet sample. The pelletized sample was placed on a printed circuit board (PCB), which was connected to the switch board.

3. Results and Discussion

The Fe central metal in FePc has a 2+ oxidation state which results in a square planar configuration. However, an octahedral metal center is needed to accommodate diaxial ligands. Thus, the oxidation of Fe from 2+ (trigonal bipyramidal) to 3+ was done by oxidative chlorination of FePc using SOCl2. SOCl2 forms SCl2, SO2, and Cl2 at room temperature and further increases its decomposition at elevated temperature under inert atmosphere. The synthesis was done under N2 gas atmosphere since SOCl2 reacts with water vapor forming SO2 and HCl. The resulting dark blue solution was vacuum filtered and washed with ethanol to remove the solvent nitrobenzene. The dried product was blue-black powder.

K[(Pc)(SCN)2] was formed by the reaction of (Pc)Cl2 with KSCN through ligand substitution. K[(Pc)(SCN)2] may polymerize in water at elevated temperature; thus, it was washed with cold distilled water to inhibit polymerization. The product was dark blue powder. Purity of sample was confirmed by thin layer chromatography (TLC); solvent system used was 70 : 30 hexane : ethanol with Rf value of 0.40.

The formation of involves the splitting off of the alkali metal thiocyanate from K[(Pc)(SCN)2] in water which was activated by heating the solution at 90–95°C [35, 8]. The reaction was very slow, wherein the solution was constantly stirred for 14 days. The resulting solution was filtered and was washed with distilled water to eliminate the by-product KSCN, leaving the black . TLC was done to check the purity of the sample; solvent system used was 70 : 30 hexane : ethanol, with Rf value of 0.30.

MPc complexes are absorbed at two main wavelengths: 300–350 nm (Soret Band) and 600–700 nm (Q-Band). K[(Pc)(SCN)2] was analyzed using UV-Vis spectroscopy and was compared to the planar FePc, as shown in Figure 1(a). UV-Vis analysis was done to ensure the integrity of the phthalocyanine ring. The results confirm the presence of an intact Pc ring as shown by intense bands at 300–400 and 600–700 nm, which were attributed to the and transitions, respectively. Further, K[(Pc)(SCN)2] show a shoulder peak characteristic to ligated MPcs at around 430 and 600 nm, which is due to the metal-ligand charge transfer band that confirms the attachment of axial ligands to the complex (Figure 1(b)) [8].

Figure 1: UV-Vis spectra of (a) FePc and (b) K[(Pc)(SCN)2].

Figures 2(a) and 2(b) display the IR profiles of K[(Pc)(SCN)2] and wherein the bands from 1500–1700 cm−1 correspond to the aromatic C=C stretch of the Pc unit. More importantly, the bonding type of axial thiocyanate ligands has been established in the 2000–2200 cm−1 region, wherein it is generally observed that a broad and strong signal signifies metal-N-bonded compound while a weak and sharp peak shows metal-S-bonded compound [18]. The 2071 cm−1 peak (weak and sharp) of K[(Pc)(SCN)2] signifies an S-bonded thiocyanate ligand to the Fe metal center. On the other hand, the 2120 cm−1 peak (weak and broad) is in between the general description for S-bonded and N-bonded thiocyanate ligand, signifying that the CN valence frequency is a bridging thiocyanate, as it has been reported that the CN valence frequency increases from free thiocyanate to metal-N, metal-S, and bridged species [1820]. Thus, the CN valence frequency shift from 2071 cm−1 to 2120 cm−1 indicates the conversion of the free SCN ligand in K[(Pc)(SCN)2] to polymeric SCN-bridged species.

Figure 2: IR spectra of (a) K[(Pc)(SCN)2] and (b) .

EDX elemental analyses of FePc, K[(Pc)(SCN)2], and revealed elemental presence of iron, carbon, and nitrogen from the FePc unit, as well as sulfur which is derived from the axial SCN ligand.

Figure 3 shows the SEM images of (a) powder and (b) baked FePc. Bulk powder FePc appears to be a rocky dense solid with rough texture. On the other hand, baked FePc formed needle-like nanocrystalline structures thus confirming the morphological conversion of FePc by HVPG technique in an evacuated tube at 400°C.

Figure 3: SEM images of (a) bulk FePc (powder) and (b) nano-FePc (crystalline).

Different conditions had been employed for FePc nanosynthesis, resulting in nanostructured FePc with different morphologies. This was done for the method optimization for the nanosynthesis. Based on the FePc nanosynthesis optimization, it was found that a baking temperature of 400°C is optimal to convert the FePc from bulk to nanostructure. Due to this, was chosen to be baked at 400°C for 4 hours. SEM analysis revealed nanorods that is approximately 2 m wide and 10 m long (Figure 4(a)). The bulk polymer appeared as “thin sheets,” confirming the morphological conversion into nanocrystalline structures by baking the sample at 400°C (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4: SEM image of (a) bulk and (b) nano- (inset: highlighting nanoscale perspective).

As shown in Figure 5, the UV analysis of nanostructured shows absorption at 350 and 650 nm corresponding to Soret and Q-bands, respectively, which are the characteristic Pc ring absorption wavelengths, including the presence of the shoulder peak at around 600 nm which is attributed to axially ligated metal center, thus, indicating an intact SCN-bridged MPc. This indicates that despite exposing the polymer at elevated temperature, no degradation of the occurred.

Figure 5: UV-Vis spectra of nano-.

The IR analysis (Figure 6) of nanostructured revealed a broad and weak CN valence frequency at 2117 cm−1, which is similar to its bulk counterpart, thus further confirming an intact SCN-bridged FePc.

Figure 6: IR spectra of nano-.

The nanostructured was also subjected to EDX analysis (Table 1), which revealed the elemental presence of C, N, Fe, and S which further validate the attachment of SCN as bridging ligand to the polymeric complex.

Table 1: EDX analysis of FePc, K[(Pc)(SCN)2], , and nano-.

The electrical conductivity of K[(Pc)(SCN)2], , and nano- was determined using the 4-probe van der Pauw method. The sample was mounted in a printed circuit board (PCB) with four thin Ag wires symmetrically attached to the four points of the sample. The PCB wires were attached to its corresponding slot in the switch board. The switch board served as a control as to which points the current and its corresponding voltage reading will pass through. Current (5.0 × 10−4 mA) was allowed to pass through on one side of the sample and its corresponding voltage on the opposite side was recorded.

Table 2 indicates the conductivity of K[(Pc)(SCN)2], and nano- at room temperature. The conductivity increased by 1 order from SCN axially ligated FePc (2.95 × 10−4 S·cm−1) to SCN-skewered FePc (1.78 × 10−3 S·cm−1) which is mainly attributed to the extended π-system conducting pathway in the polymer through the Fe-SCN-Fe spine. Also, the conductivity increased twice from the bulk to the nanostructured (3.50 × 10−3 S·cm−1). This is mainly because of the more orderly solid-state arrangement of the nanostructured polymer, resulting in a better and more efficient multidimensional electron transport.

Table 2: Calculated conductivity of K[(Pc)(SCN)2], , and Nano- (pelletized, 103 psi).

The sample thickness was calculated using a viewing scope that was connected to the computer from which a screen caliper was used to measure the thickness of the sample. The radius of the pellet was measured using a conventional vernier caliper and the corresponding calculations were done for the determination of the sample density. As shown in Table 3, the density was calculated to be around 0.40–0.41 g/cm3 for the two samples. The data can also be interpreted that only half the amount of nanostructured material is required to achieve the same electrical conductivity of bulk which is an important attribute for miniaturization and optimization of electronic devices.

Table 3: Density of measured samples for conductivity.

4. Conclusion

The transport of electrons in bridged MPcs can be further enhanced with the conversion of its bulk form into nanocrystalline structures. The skewered phthalocyanine conducting polymer can be converted into crystalline nanostructures via horizontal vapor phase growth, thereby creating more order on the orientation of the skewered/“shish-kebab” polymeric chain. The process has resulted in a twofold increase in electrical conductivity of per unit density. Thus, the nanosynthesis of polymeric system provides a more efficient, multidimensional π-electron transport system which can be a promising class of organic conductors.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. T. J. Marks, “Interfaces between molecular and polymeric ‘metals’: electrically conductive, structure-enforced assemblies of metallomacrocycles,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 29, pp. 857–879, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Inabe and H. Tajima, “Phthalocyanines-versatile components of molecular conductors,” Chemical Review, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 5503–5534, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Metz and M. Hanack, “Synthesis, characterization, and conductivity of (μ-cyano)(phthalocyaninato)cobalt(III),” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 828–830, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. R. Subramanian, “Tribute to Professor Dr Michael Hanack,” Journal of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 300–309, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. N. B. McKeown, “Phthalocyanine-containing polymers,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1979–1995, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. E. C. Yu, H. Imai, M. Ushio, S. Takeda, T. Naito, and T. Inabe, “One-step synthesis of partially oxidized cobalt(III) phthalocyanine salts with axial ligands,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 602–603, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Yu, M. Matsuda, H. Tajima, T. Naito, and T. Inabe, “Stable π-π dependent electron conduction band of TPP[M(Pc)L2]2 molecular conductors (TPP = tetraphenylphosphonium; M = Co, Fe; Pc = phthalocyaninato; L = CN, Cl, Br),” Dalton Transactions, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2283–2288, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Yu, E. Gacho, G. Janairo, P. Ang, and S. Tan, “Skewered cyano-ligated cobalt 1,2-naphthalocyanine polymer: an electron transport engineering,” The Manila Journal of Science, vol. 6, pp. 33–35, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  9. D. E. C. Yu, M. Matsuda, H. Tajima et al., “Variable magnetotransport properties in the TPP[Fe(Pc)L2]2 system (TPP = tetraphenylphosphonium, Pc = phthalocyaninato, L = CN, Cl, and Br),” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 718–723, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Ang and S. Tan, Nano-based materials engineering of phthalocyanine molecular conductors [B.Sc. thesis], De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines, 2009.
  11. G. Santos, A. Salvador, and R. Quiroga, “Temperature and deposition time dependence of the geometrical properties of tin oxide nanostructures,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, vol. 2, pp. 1–6, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. X. Lu, W. Zhang, C. Wang, T.-C. Wen, and Y. Wei, “One-dimensional conducting polymer nanocomposites: synthesis, properties and applications,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 671–712, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S.-J. Kim, M. Matsumoto, and K. Shigehara, “Synthesis and electrical properties of poly(μ-1,4-diisocyanobenzene) octacyanophthalocyaninatoiron(II),” Synthetic Metals, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. F. Myers, G. W. Rayner Canham, and A. B. P. Lever, “Higher oxidation level phthalocyanine complexes of chromium, iron, cobalt, and zinc. Phthalocyanine radical species,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 461–468, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Hanack, C. Hedtmann-Rein, A. Datz, U. Keppeler, and U. Munz, “Synthesis and Characterization of (μ-thiocyanato) and (μ-azido) phthalocyaninato metal complexes,” Synthetic Metals, vol. 19, no. 1–3, pp. 787–792, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Hedtmann-Rein, M. Hanack, K. Peters, E. M. Peters, and H. G. von Schnering, “Synthesis and properties of (phthalocyaninato)- and (tetrabenzoporphyrinato)cobalt(III) thiocyanate and isothiocyanate compounds. Crystal and molecular structure of (phthalocyaninato)(pyridine)(thiocyanato)cobalt(III),” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 2647–2651, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. L. van der Pauw, “A method of measuring specific resistivity and hall effect of discs of arbitrary shape,” Philips Research Reports, vol. 13, pp. 1–9, 1958. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. A. Bailey, S. L. Kozak, T. W. Michelsen, and W. N. Mills, “Infrared spectra of complexes of the thiocyanate and related ions,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 407–445, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. H. Norbury, “Coordination chemistry of the cyanate, thiocyanate, and selenocyanate ions,” Advances in Inorganic Chemistry and Radiochemistry, vol. 17, pp. 231–386, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Tomkiewicz, J. Klak, J. Mrozinski, J. Kłak, and J. Mroziński, “Bimetallic complexes with macrocyclic ligands.Variation of magnetic exchange interactions in some heteronuclear thiocyanatobridged compounds,” Materials Science-Poland, vol. 22, pp. 253–263, 2004. View at Google Scholar