Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jnt/volume-2017/4575013/figures/4575013.fig.0012a.svgz" name="4575013.fig.0012a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Power consumption versus diameter</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jnt/volume-2017/4575013/figures/4575013.fig.0012b.svgz" name="4575013.fig.0012b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Read delay versus diameter</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="c"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jnt/volume-2017/4575013/figures/4575013.fig.0012c.svgz" name="4575013.fig.0012c" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(c) </b>SNM versus diameter</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="d"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/jnt/volume-2017/4575013/figures/4575013.fig.0012d.svgz" name="4575013.fig.0012d" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(d) </b>WM versus diameter</td></tr></table>

<div>Dependence of SRAM characteristics on the variation in the CNT diameter.</div>

Journal of Nanotechnology

fig12

Figure 12

Figure 12: Comparative Analysis of 6T, 7T, 8T, 9T, and 10T Realistic CNTFET Based SRAM 