Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Oncology
Volume 2009, Article ID 310132, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/310132
Review Article

Eosinophils and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Short Review

Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Division of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland

Received 24 April 2009; Revised 7 August 2009; Accepted 13 September 2009

Academic Editor: James L. Mulshine

Copyright © 2009 C. P. Martinelli-Kläy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The eosinophil cell has been related as a prognostic indicator for cancers. However, its exact function in tumour behaviour is still not clearly defined. In the oral cavity the presence of eosinophils can be a favourable prognostic indicator as well as it may be associated with a poor prognosis. In this short review, we briefly summarize the role of the eosinophils in the general context of immunoregulation and its relation to oral squamous cell carcinoma.

1. Introduction

The vast majority of cancers in the oral cavity are squamous cell carcinomas (SCC)—its evolution is influenced by host immune response cells (e.g., CD8+ T, CD4+ T, natural killer cells-NK, dendritic cells-DC, macrophages, and eosinophils) [1].

The eosinophils are considered as destructive effector leukocytes with cytotoxic activities mainly implicated in parasitic infections (e.g., helminthic infections) and allergic diseases (e.g., bronchial asthma, allergic dermatitis, etc.). However, studies have shown that they can also be involved in tissue remodelling and in innate and acquired immunity response modulation [2, 3] (Figure 1).

310132.fig.001
Figure 1: Eosinophil function in the immune response. The eosinophils can stimulate or inhibit the immune response, leading to a probable good or poor prognosis, respectively. EPO: Eosinophil peroxidase; MBP: Major basic protein; ECP: Eosinphil cationic protein; EDN: Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin; IL (Interleukin)-4, IL5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13; IFN- : Interferon-γ; MHC II: histocompatibility complex II molecules; IDO: indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase; TGF- : Transforming growth factor-β.

Under diverse stimuli (e.g., infections, tumours, etc.), the eosinophils are able to release different substances, such as, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil peroxidise (EPO), eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-18, interferon (INF)- , tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- , transforming growth factor (TGF)- , TGF-β, chemokines (RANTES, endotaxin-1), platelet-activating factor (PAF), leukotriene C4 (LTC4), neuromediators, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [4, 5]. These substances may cause cell death and induction of inflammatory symptoms as well as contribute to tumour progression or regulation. Furthermore, the eosinophils present membrane receptors (e.g., IL-1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 13, granulocyte monocyte colony-stimulating factor—GM-CSF, IFN- , TNF- , and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 ) that confer a survival and recruitment capacity of eosinophils themselves [2].

In oral SCC, the exact function of eosinophils still remains unclear. Several studies have shown that eosinophils can be associated with an improved prognosis, but there are other studies however, showing their association with a poor prognosis as well [6, 7].

In this short review, we summarize briefly the role of the eosinophils in the general context of immunoregulation and its relation with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

2. The Eosinophil and Its Diverse Functions in the Context of Immunoregulation

Under a specific stimulus, the naïve CD4+ T and CD8+ T cell can be differentiated, respectively, into Th2 and Tc2 cells and secrete mainly cytokines involved with humoral immunity such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 [8, 9]. The initial recruitment and activation of eosinophils towards the tumour microenvironment is principally related with Th2 response, although necrotic cells can stimulate both the migration and the activation of eosinophils [10, 11]. According to the literature, Th2 response may eliminate the cancer on the dependence of eosinophils and macrophages [8, 1214]. IL-4 and IL-13 are potent inducers of eotaxin chemokines that can explain the eosinophilia associated with Th2 responses [15]. In oral squamous cell carcinoma, the eotaxin expressed by tumour cells and eosinophils were involved in the mechanisms of eosinophil chemotaxis to the tumour [16]. IL-4 presents antiangiogenic properties which could inhibit the tumour growth [17]. Furthermore, IL-5 transgenic mice presented attenuated growth of fibrosarcoma induced by methylcholanthrene [18]. However, IL-4 can have a cell antiapoptotic property which could help tumour growth [19]. IL-13 has also been involved with the antitumour immune response mediated mainly by neutrophils (Gr-1+) and macrophages (MAC-3+) [20]. However, IL-13 can also inhibit the IFN-γ secretion and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity and compromise the anti-tumour immunity response [21].

Studies have also shown that eosinophils can process and present histocompatibility complex II (MHC-class II) molecules [22] and polarize the Th2 response [23]. Upon stimulation with IFN- , IL-3, and GM-CSF, human eosinophilc cell line differentiated with dibutyryl cyclic AMP (dEoL-1) and human peripheral blood (PB) eosinophils were able to respond to the lymphoid chemokines (e.g., CCL11, CCL21, and CCL25). In addition, cytokine-stimulated dEoL-1 cells expressed human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR and costimulatory molecules such as CD80, CD86 and CD40 [24]. Therefore, eosinophils can migrate to the lymphoid chemokine microenvironment and express antigen-presenting cells (APCs)- related costimulatory molecules. However, some experimental models have suggested that eosinophils are inefficient antigen-presenting cells when compared to macrophages [25] or dendritic cells [26].

The eosinophil-derived neurotoxin stored in eosinophils granules is able to induce DC maturation and activation through up-regulation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, nuclear factor-Kappa B (NF Kappa B) and CD83, CD86 costimulatory molecules, and MHC class II expression [27, 28]. EDN-treated human DCs stimulated Th2 immune response via Toll-like receptor (TLR)2-MyD88 signal [28].

Eosinophils can also be related with cytokines of Th1 response [29]. They may express IFN- as well as IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10 suggesting a subpopulation of human eosinophils that expresses Th1 or Th2 cytokines, respectively [30]. It has been shown that not only the Th1 response is able to eradicate the tumour through the cellular immunity response but also Th2 response via tumour necrosis [12]. Furthermore, IL-12 expressing eosinophils are able to activate Th1 [31].

Contrarily, eosinophils are capable to downregulate the antitumour immunity, through mainly IL-10 [32] and IDO production [33]. IL10 is a potent inhibitor of MHC complex and CD80 and CD86 expression on DC as well as it suppresses the DC differentiation. In addition, IL-10 prevents the Th1 and Th2 cytokines production. Contrarily, IL-10 can play a role in the B cell activation and survival [32].

Through indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase production, the eosinophils may also play a role in escape immune surveillance. This enzyme catalyzes the amino acid tryptophan to kynurenine which is able to cause cycle arrest and apoptosis from uncommitted CD4+ T cells [33] as well as maintenance of Th2 response [34]. The IDO was correlated with the poor prognosis in the non-small cell lung cancer [35].

It has been shown that the eosinophils are capable of producing various substances (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor-VEGF, fibroblast growth factor-FGF, TNF- , GM-CSF, nerve growth factor-NGF, TGF- , and IL-8) that can promote angiogenesis and produce collagenous fibers [36]. In addition, TGF- is considerate as a strong immunosuppressive cytokine—it is capable of inhibiting T cell proliferation and differentiation. TGF- can also inhibit the cytolytic activity of NK [37].

3. Prognostic Value of Eosinophils in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

In head and neck SCC, it has been shown that the Th1 response is mainly associated with a better prognosis than those with the Th2 response [38, 39]. According to Argarwal and colleagues [40], early stage of oral SCC expressed mainly INF- and IL-2 genes (Th1 responses), whereas the advanced stage tumours presented IL-4 and IL-10 expression (Th2 response). In addition, advancing lesions of the tongue squamous cell carcinoma, induced by 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide, have downregulated Th1-type and upregulated Th2-type cytokine production [41].

Regarding studies with eosinophils in the blood, the presence of eosinophils and Th2 cells can be related with tumour progression [42] and poor prognosis [43, 44]. Peripheral blood analyses of intraoral squamous cell carcinoma with a history of tobacco use presented enhanced expression of Th2 cytokine [43]. The metastatic squamous cell carcinoma showed increased blood eosinophilia and elevated serum interleukin-5 levels [44]. However, patients with malignant disease (e.g., acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia) that underwent stem cell transplantation [45] or patients with cervical cancer treated with whole-pelvic irradiation [46] presented increased blood eosinophilia and better overall survival.

Tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) has been reported in diverse sites [14, 35, 4753] including the head and neck region [6, 7, 5465] (Figure 2).

310132.fig.002
Figure 2: Oral squamous cell carcinoma showing rather numerous eosinophils (black arrows), together with lymphocytes, mingling around nests of nonkeratinized neoplastic oral epithelial cells. Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue, H&E stained, original magnification 400.

In the head and neck region, TATE presents controversial results. Some studies have shown that the TATE has a favourable prognosis, suggesting that eosinophils may play a protective role against epithelial tumours [6, 55, 60, 62]. Other studies however, suggest that eosinophils may play a role in promoting epithelial tumour growth accounting for a poor prognosis [7, 57, 58] or even no effect on tumour evolution [54, 56, 59, 63].

With regard to good prognosis, it has been shown that oral SCC patients with TATE presented higher overall survival [6] and less incidence of distant metastasis in head and neck tumours [62]. Nevertheless, Tadbir and colleagues [54] have shown that TATE was not associated with vascular, perineural, muscle invasion, and locoregional metastasis in SCC of the oral cavity. Similar results were observed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [56] and oral SSC [65] where the eosinophils were not associated with local recurrence, distant metastases, or survival. In another study of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, TATE was associated only with the age-TATE-positive patients presented between 50 and 60 years of age, whereas the TATE-negative patients were between 60 and 70 years of age [63]. According to Oliveira and colleagues [65] and Cormier and colleagues [11], the presence of eosinophis in damaged striated muscular fibers of oral cancer or in capsule of B16-F10 melanoma cell-derived tumours, respectively, could be related with tissue remodelling.

On the other hand, the presence of eosinophils has also been related with a poor prognosis. In oral SCC, eosinophilic infiltration and HLA-DR expression in tumour cells were related to unfavourable prognosis [7]. In the experimental studies of oral carcinoma, the depletion of TATE with anti-IL-5 mAb was associated with a delayed development of the tumours [64]. According to Falconieri and colleagues [61] and Oliveira and colleagues [65], the eosinophil presence in the SCC of the oral cavity was associated with stromal invasion and metastasis [61]. Similar results have been observed in head and neck carcinoma [57, 58] and cervix [51] where eosinophils infiltrate has increased the suspicion of invasion. The presence of >3 eosinophils/high-power field (hpf), ≥5/hpf, and ≥10/10 hpf in cervical incisional biopy and excisional specimens were associated with invasion [51].

According to Dorta and colleagues [6], the prognosis related with TATE is controversial due to the different methodology utilized to count tumour-associated tissue eosinophila, thereby prejudicing a comparison of the results. For this reason Alkhabuli and High [66] suggested the counting of eosinophils through a density method, which utilizes the highest density of eosinophils per surface area, in preference to the classic method that counts eosinophils/hpf.

4. Conclusion

In general, the presence as well as the state of activation of immunologic cells plays an important role in tumour cell progression. Diverse studies examining eosinophils in tumour development have been carried out. However, the prognostic value of eosinophils in oral carcinoma still remains unclear. Further studies on eosinophils and their state of activation are necessary in order to elucidate these findings.

References

  1. T. L. Whiteside, “Immunology of head and neck cancer,” Cancer Metastasis Reviews , vol. 24, pp. 95–105, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  2. E. A. Jacobsen, A. G. Taranova, N. A. Lee, and J. J. Lee, “Eosinophils: singularly destructive effector cells or purveyors of immunoregulation?” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1313–1320, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. R. Lotfi, J. J. Lee, and M. T. Lotze, “Eosinophilic granulocytes and damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs): role in the inflammatory response within tumors,” Journal of Immunotherapy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. H. Kita, “The eosinophil: a cytokine-producing cell?” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 889–892, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. E. Rothenberg and S. P. Hogan, “The eosinophil,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 24, pp. 147–174, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. J. I. Ellyard, L. Simson, and C. R. Parish, “Th2-mediated anti-tumour immunity: friend or foe?” Tissue Antigens, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. R. G. Dorta, G. Landman, L. P. Kowalski, J. R. P. Lauris, M. R. D. O. Latorre, and D. T. Oliveira, “Tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinomas,” Histopathology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 152–157, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Horiuchi, K. Mishima, M. Ohsawa, M. Sugimura, and K. Aozasa, “Prognostic factors for well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity with emphasis on immunohistochemical evaluation,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Li, S. Sad, D. Kägi, and T. R. Mosmann, “CD8Tc1 and Tc2 cells secrete distinct cytokine patterns in vitro and in vivo but induce similar inflammatory reactions,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 158, no. 9, pp. 4152–4161, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A.-L. Stenfeldt and C. Wennerås, “Danger signals derived from stressed and necrotic epithelial cells activate human eosinophils,” Immunology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 605–614, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. S. A. Cormier, A. G. Taranova, C. Bedient et al., “Pivotal Advance: eosinophil infiltration of solid tumors is an early and persistent inflammatory host response,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 1131–1139, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. T. Nishimura, K. Iwakabe, M. Sekimoto et al., “Distinct role of antigen-specific T helper type 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells in tumor eradication in vivo,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 190, no. 5, pp. 617–627, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. I. Tepper, P. K. Pattengale, and P. Leder, “Murine interleukin-4 displays potent anti-tumor activity in vivo,” Cell, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 503–512, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. I. Tepper, R. L. Coffman, and P. Leder, “An eosinophil-dependent mechanism for the antitumor effect of interleukin-4,” Science, vol. 257, no. 5069, pp. 548–551, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Zimmermann, G. K. Hershey, P. S. Foster, and M. E. Rothenberg, “Chemokines in asthma: cooperative interaction between chemokines and IL-13,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 227–242, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. C. M. Lorena, D. T. Oliveira, R. G. Dorta, G. Landman, and L. P. Kowalski, “Eotaxin expression in oral squamous cell carcinomas with and without tumour associated tissue eosinophilia,” Oral Diseases, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 279–283, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. O. V. Volpert, T. Fong, A. E. Koch et al., “Inhibition of angiogenesis by interleukin 4,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 188, no. 6, pp. 1039–1046, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Simson, J. I. Ellyard, L. A. Dent et al., “Regulation of carcinogenesis by IL-5 and CCL11: a potential role for eosinophils in tumor immune surveillance,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 7, pp. 4222–4229, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Conticello, F. Pedini, A. Zeuner et al., “Il-4 protects cells from anti-CD95 and chemotherapeutic agents via up-regulation of antiapoptotic proteins,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 9, pp. 5467–5477, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H.-L. Ma, M. J. Whitters, B. A. Jacobson, D. D. Donaldson, M. Collins, and K. Dunussi-Joannopoulos, “Tumor cells secreting IL-13 but not IL-13Rα2 fusion protein have reduced tumorigenicity in vivo,” International Immunology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1009–1017, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. M. Terabe, S. Matsui, N. Noben-Trauth et al., “NKT cell-mediated repression of tumor immunosurveillance by IL-13 and the IL-4R-STAT6 pathway,” Nature Immunology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 515–520, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H.-Z. Shi, “Eosinophils function as antigen-presenting cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 520–527, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. U. M. Padigel, J. J. Lee, T. J. Nolan, G. A. Schad, and D. Abraham, “Eosinophils can function as antigen-presenting cells to induce primary and secondary immune responses to Strongyloides stercoralis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 3232–3238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. Y.-J. Jung, S.-Y. Woo, M. H. Jang et al., “Human eosinophils show chemotaxis to lymphoid chemokines and exhibit antigen-presenting-cell-like properties upon stimulation with IFN-γ, IL-3 and GM-CSF,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  25. S. D. Mawhorter, J. W. Kazura, and W. H. Boom, “Human eosinophils as antigen-presenting cells: relative efficiency for superantigen- and antigen-induced CD4+ T-cell proliferation,” Immunology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 584–591, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. S. van Rijt, N. Vos, D. Hijdra, V. C. de Vries, H. C. Hoogsteden, and B. N. Lambrecht, “Airway eosinophils accumulate in the mediastinal lymph nodes but lack antigen-presenting potential for naive T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 171, no. 7, pp. 3372–3378, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. J. Oppenheim and D. Yang, “Alarmins: chemotactic activators of immune responses,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 359–365, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. D. Yang, Q. Chen, S. B. Su et al., “Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin acts as an alarmin to activate the TLR2-MyD88 signal pathway in dendritic cells and enhances Th2 immune responses,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. L.-Y. Liu, S. K. Mathur, J. B. Sedgwick, N. N. Jarjour, W. W. Busse, and E. A. B. Kelly, “Human airway and peripheral blood eosinophils enhance Th1 and Th2 cytokine secretion,” Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 589–597, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. B. Lamkhioued, A. S. Gounni, D. Aldebert et al., “Synthesis of type 1 (IFN gamma) and type 2 (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) cytokines by human eosinophils,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 796, pp. 203–208, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. Grewe, W. Czech, A. Morita et al., “Human eosinophils produce biologically active IL-12: implications for control of T cell responses,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 415–420, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. M. Mosser and X. Zhang, “Interleukin-10: new perspectives on an old cytokine,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 205–218, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. D. H. Munn and A. L. Mellor, “Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tumor-induced tolerance,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1147–1154, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  34. S. O. Odemuyiwa, A. Ghahary, Y. Li et al., “Cutting edge: human eosinophils regulate T cell subset selection through indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 10, pp. 5909–5913, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Astigiano, B. Morandi, R. Costa et al., “Eosinophil granulocytes account for indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated immune escape in human non-small cell lung cancer,” Neoplasia, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 390–396, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Puxeddu, D. Ribatti, E. Crivellato, and F. Levi-Schaffer, “Mast cells and eosinophils: a novel link between inflammation and angiogenesis in allergic diseases,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 531–536, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. M. Tian and W. P. Schiemann, “The TGFβ paradox in human cancer: an update,” Future Oncology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 259–271, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. C. M. L. van Herpen, J. A. W. M. van der Laak, I. J. M. Vries et al., “Intratumoral recombinant humam interleukin-12 administration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients modifies locoregional lymph node architecture and induces natural killer cell infiltration in the primary tumor,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, pp. 1899–1909, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  39. S. Dasgupta, M. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee, B. W. O'Malley Jr., and S. K. Chatterjee, “Recombinant vaccinia virus expressing interleukin-2 invokes anti-tumor cellular immunity in an orthotopic murine model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 183–192, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. A. Agarwal, M. Rani, G. K. Saha, T. M. Valarmathi, S. Bahadur, B. K. Mohanti et al., “Disregulated expression of the Th2 cytokine gene in patients with intraoral squamous cell carcinoma,” Immunological Investigations, vol. 32, no. 1-2, pp. 17–30, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Jiang, D. Ye, W. Qiu et al., “Response of lymphocyte subsets and cytokines to Shenyang prescription in Sprague-Dawley rats with tongue squamous cell carcinomas induced by 4NQO,” BMC Cancer, vol. 7, pp. 40–49, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  42. N. Horie, T. Shimoyama, T. Kaneko, and F. Ide, “Multiple oral squamous cell carcinomas with blood and tissue eosinophila,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1648–1650, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. P. Manchanda, S. C. Sharma, and S. N. Das, “Differential regulation of IL-2 and IL-4 in patients with tobacco-related oral squamous cell carcinoma,” Oral Diseases, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 455–462, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. R. Walter, H. I. Joller-Jemelka, and F. Salomon, “Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma with marked blood eosinophilia and elevated serum interleukin-5 levels,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. Sato, R. Kobayashi, M. Nakajima, A. Iguchi, and T. Ariga, “Significance of eosinophilia after stem cell transplantation as a possible prognostic marker for favorable outcome,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 985–991, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  46. H. Yamazaki, T. Inoue, E. Tanaka et al., “Pelvic irradiation-induced eosinophilia is correlated to prognosis of cervical cancer patients and transient elevation of serum interleukin 5 level,” Radiation Medicine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 317–321, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. M. J. Fernández-Aceñero, M. Galindo-Gallego, J. Sanz, and A. Aljama, “Prognostic influence of tumor-associated eosinophilic infiltrate in colorectal carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 1544–1548, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. S. Kapp and V. A. LiVolsi, “Intense eosinophilic stromal infiltration in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic study of 14 cases,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Cuschieri, I. C. Talbot, and S. Weeden, “Influence of pathological tumour variables on long-term survival in resectable gastric cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 674–679, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  50. T. P. Pretlow, E. F. Keith, A. K. Cryar et al., “Eosinophil infiltration of human colonic carcinomas as a prognostic indicator,” Cancer Research, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2997–3000, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. G. W. Spiegel, M. Ashraf, and J. J. S. Brooks, “Eosinophils as a marker for invasion in cervical squamous neoplastic lesions,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. J. F. Quaedvlieg, D. H. K. V. Creytens, G. G. Epping et al., “Histopathological characteristics of metastasizing squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and lips,” Histopathology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 256–264, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. S. Agarwal, N. Wadhwa, and G. Gupta, “Eosinophils as a marker for invasion in cervical squamous neoplastic lesions,” International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 213, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. A. Tadbir, M. J. Ashraf, and Y. Sardari, “Prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilic infiltration in oral squamous cell carcinoma,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 287–289, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  55. M. M. Goldsmith, D. H. Cresson, and F. B. Askin, “The prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilia in head and neck cancer,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 319–324, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. E. Leighton, J. G. Teo, S. F. Leung, A. Y. Cheung, J. C. Lee, and C. A. van Hasselt, “Prevalence and prognostic significance of tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 436–440, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. S. J. Alrawi, D. Tan, D. L. Stoler et al., “Tissue eosinophilic infiltration: a useful marker for assessing stromal invasion, survival and locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous neoplasia,” Cancer Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 217–225, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. Said, S. Wiseman, J. Yang et al., “Tissue eosinophilia: a morphologic marker for assessing stromal invasion in laryngeal squamous neoplasms,” BMC Clinical Pathology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  59. A. M. Sassler, K. D. McClatchey, G. T. Wolf, and S. G. Fisher, “Eosinophilic infiltration in advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma,” Laryngoscope, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 413–416, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. D. Lowe and C. D. M. Fletcher, “Eosinophilia in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, external genitalia and anus-clinical correlations,” Histopathology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 627–632, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. G. Falconieri, M. A. Luna, S. Pizzolitto, G. DeMaglio, V. Angione, and M. Rocco, “Eosinophil-rich squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity: a study of 13 cases and delineation of a possible new microscopic entity,” Annals of Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 322–327, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  62. M. M. Goldsmith, D. A. Belchis, D. H. Cresson, W. D. Merritt III, and F. B. Askin, “The importance of the eosinophil in head and neck cancer,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. I. Ercan, B. Çakir, T. Başak, T. Özdemir, I. Sayin, and S. Turgut, “Prognostic significance of stromal eosinophilic infiltration in cancer of the larynx,” Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 869–873, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  64. D. T. W. Wong, S. M. Bowen, A. Elovic, G. T. Gallagher, and P. F. Weller, “Eosinophil ablation and tumor development,” Oral Oncology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 496–501, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. D. T. Oliveira, K. C. Tjioe, A. Assao et al., “Tissue eosinophilia and its association with tumoral invasion of oral cancer,” International Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 244–249, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  66. J. O. Alkhabuli and A. S. High, “Significance of eosinophil counting in tumor associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE),” Oral Oncology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 849–850, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus