Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Oncology
Volume 2010, Article ID 363106, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/363106
Review Article

How Do Cells Make Decisions: Engineering Micro- and Nanoenvironments for Cell Migration

1Centre for Vascular Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW, Australia
2School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW, Australia

Received 12 March 2010; Accepted 1 April 2010

Academic Editor: Claudia D. Andl

Copyright © 2010 Siti Hawa Ngalim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. T. Pals, D. J. J. De Gorter, and M. Spaargaren, “Lymphoma dissemination: the other face of lymphocyte homing,” Blood, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 3102–3111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. M. Vicente-Manzanares, D. J. Webb, and A. R. Horwitz, “Cell migration at a glance,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, no. 21, pp. 4917–4919, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. R. J. Cain and A. J. Ridley, “Phosphoinositide 3-kinases in cell migration,” Biology of the Cell, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. C. Gómez-Moutón, J. L. Abad, E. Mira et al., “Segregation of leading-edge and uropod components into specific lipid rafts during T cell polarization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 17, pp. 9642–9647, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  5. A. Nishikimi, H. Fukuhara, W. Su et al., “Sequential regulation of DOCK2 dynamics by two phospholipids during neutrophil chemotaxis,” Science, vol. 324, no. 5925, pp. 384–387, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. N. R. Leslie, I. H. Batty, H. Maccario, L. Davidson, and C. P. Downes, “Understanding PTEN regulation: PIP2, polarity and protein stability,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 41, pp. 5464–5476, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. M. Vicente-Manzanares, C. K. Choi, and A. R. Horwitz, “Integrins in cell migration—the actin connection,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 199–206, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. L. Soon, G. Mouneimne, J. Segall, J. Wyckoff, and J. Condeelis, “Description and characterization of a chamber for viewing and quantifying cancer cell chemotaxis,” Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. B. Heit and P. Kubes, “Measuring chemotaxis and chemokinesis: the under-agarose cell migration assay,” Science's STKE, vol. 2003, no. 170, article PL5, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  10. L. J. Kricka, O. Nozaki, S. Heyner, W. T. Garside, and P. Wilding, “Applications of a microfabricated device for evaluating sperm function,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1944–1947, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  11. N. Li Jeon, H. Baskaran, S. K. W. Dertinger, G. M. Whitesides, L. V. de Water, and M. Toner, “Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 826–830, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. D. Holmes and S. Gawad, “The application of microfluidics in biology,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 583, pp. 55–80, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. Lin, “Chapter 15 a microfluidics-based method for chemoattractant gradients,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 461, pp. 333–347, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Xia and G. M. Whitesides, “Soft lithography,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 551–575, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Mahmud, C. J. Campbell, K. J. M. Bishop et al., “Directing cell motions on micropatterned ratchets,” Nature Physics, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 606–612, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S.-J. Wang, W. Saadi, F. Lin, C. Minh-Canh Nguyen, and N. Li Jeon, “Differential effects of EGF gradient profiles on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell chemotaxis,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 300, no. 1, pp. 180–189, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  17. W. G. Tharp, R. Yadav, D. Irimia et al., “Neutrophil chemorepulsion in defined interleukin-8 gradients in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 539–554, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. S. L. Faley, M. Copland, D. Wlodkowic et al., “Microfluidic single cell arrays to interrogate signalling dynamics of individual, patient-derived hematopoietic stem cells,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 2659–2664, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. A. D. Dubash, M. M. Menold, T. Samson et al., “Focal adhesions: new angles on an old structure,” in International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, chapter 1, pp. 1–65, Academic Press, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Jain and L. L. Munn, “Determinants of leukocyte margination in rectangular microchannels,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 9, article e7104, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. M. Adler, M. Polinkovsky, E. Gutierrez, and A. Groisman, “Generation of oxygen gradients with arbitrary shapes in a microfluidic device,” Lab on a Chip, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 388–391, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. C. G. Rolli, T. Seufferlein, R. Kemkemer, and J. P. Spatz, “Impact of tumor cell cytoskeleton organization on invasiveness and migration: a microchannel-based approach,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 1, article e8726, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. M. A. Schwartz, “Integrins, oncogenes, and anchorage independence,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 575–578, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. Sahai and C. J. Marshall, “RHO—GTPases and cancer,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Schwartz and M. H. Ginsberg, “Networks and crosstalk: integrin signalling spreads,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. E65–E68, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. R. O. Hynes, “Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines,” Cell, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 673–687, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. A. Schwartz, “Integrin signaling revisited,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 466–470, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. J. Cross, J. Dixelius, T. Matsumoto, and L. Claesson-Welsh, “VEGF-receptor signal transduction,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 488–494, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. V. Byzova, C. K. Goldman, N. Pampori et al., “A mechanism for modulation of cellular responses to VEGF: activation of the integrins,” Molecular Cell, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 851–860, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Gong, K. V. Stoletov, and B. I. Terman, “VEGF treatment induces signaling pathways that regulate both actin polymerization and depolymerization,” Angiogenesis, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 313–321, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. N. Soga, N. Namba, S. McAllister et al., “Rho family GTPases regulate VEGF-stimulated endothelial cell motility,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 269, no. 1, pp. 73–87, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. K. V. Stoletov, C. Gong, and B. I. Terman, “Nck and Crk mediate distinct VEGF-induced signaling pathways that serve overlapping functions in focal adhesion turnover and integrin activation,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 258–268, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. R. E. Nisato, J.-C. Tille, A. Jonczyk, S. L. Goodman, and M. S. Pepper, “αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin antagonists inhibit angiogenesis in vitro,” Angiogenesis, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 105–119, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  34. B. P. Eliceiri and D. A. Cheresh, “Adhesion events in angiogenesis,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 563–568, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. L. Bader, H. Rayburn, D. Crowley, and R. O. Hynes, “Extensive vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and organogenesis precede lethality in mice lacking all αv integrins,” Cell, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 507–519, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. E. Reynolds, L. Wyder, J. C. Lively et al., “Enhanced pathological angiogenesis in mice lacking β3 integrin or β3 and β5 integrins,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. B. Geiger, J. P. Spatz, and A. D. Bershadsky, “Environmental sensing through focal adhesions,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. J. A. Chapman, M. Tzaphlidou, K. M. Meek, and K. E. Kadler, “The collagen fibril—a model system for studying the staining and fixation of a protein,” Electron Microscopy Reviews, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 143–182, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. F. Paige, J. K. Rainey, and M. C. Goh, “A study of fibrous long spacing collagen ultrastructure and assembly by atomic force microscopy,” Micron, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 341–353, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. Pompe, L. Renner, and C. Werner, “Nanoscale features of fibronectin fibrillogenesis depend on protein-substrate interaction and cytoskeleton structure,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 527–534, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  41. B. K. Brandley and R. L. Schnaar, “Covalent attachment of an Arg-Gly-Asp sequence peptide to derivatizable polyacrylamide surfaces: support of fibroblast adhesion and long-term growth,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 270–278, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. B. K. Brandley and R. L. Schnaar, “Tumor cell haptotaxis on covalently immobilized linear and exponential gradients of a cell adhesion peptide,” Developmental Biology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 74–86, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. P. Massia and J. A. Hubbell, “An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin αvβ3-mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 1089–1100, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. G. Maheshwari, G. Brown, D. A. Lauffenburger, A. Wells, and L. G. Griffith, “Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 113, no. 10, pp. 1677–1686, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. S. Chen, M. Mrksich, S. Huang, G. M. Whitesides, and D. E. Ingber, “Geometric control of cell life and death,” Science, vol. 276, no. 5317, pp. 1425–1428, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Mrksich, C. S. Chen, Y. Xia, L. E. Dike, D. E. Ingber, and G. M. Whitesides, “Controlling cell attachment on contoured surfaces with self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 20, pp. 10775–10778, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. E. A. Cavalcanti-Adam, T. Volberg, A. Micoulet, H. Kessler, B. Geiger, and J. P. Spatz, “Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 2964–2974, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. M. Arnold, V. C. Hirschfeld-Warneken, T. Lohmüller et al., “Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 2063–2069, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. K. L. Prime and G. M. Whitesides, “Self-assembled organic monolayers: model systems for studying adsorption of proteins at surfaces,” Science, vol. 252, no. 5010, pp. 1164–1167, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. Singhvi, A. Kumar, G. P. Lopez et al., “Engineering cell shape and function,” Science, vol. 264, no. 5159, pp. 696–698, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. Y. Koo, D. J. Irvine, A. M. Mayes, D. A. Lauffenburger, and L. G. Griffith, “Co-regulation of cell adhesion by nanoscale RGD organization and mechanical stimulus,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 115, no. 7, pp. 1423–1433, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Kato and M. Mrksich, “Using model substrates to study the dependence of focal adhesion formation on the affinity of integrin-ligand complexes,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2699–2707, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. B. T. Houseman and M. Mrksich, “The microenvironment of immobilized Arg-Gly-Asp peptides is an important determinant of cell adhesion,” Biomaterials, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 943–955, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Arnold, E. A. Cavalcanti-Adam, R. Glass et al., “Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces,” ChemPhysChem, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 383–388, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  55. E. A. Cavalcanti-Adam, T. Volberg, A. Micoulet, H. Kessler, B. Geiger, and J. P. Spatz, “Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 2964–2974, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  56. J. Huang, S. V. Gräter, F. Corbellini et al., “Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1111–1116, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. F. Carreiras, B. Thiébot, J. Leroy-Dudal, S. Maubant, M.-F. Breton, and H. Darbeida, “Involvement of αvβ3 integrin and disruption of endothelial fibronectin network during the adhesion of the human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line IGROV1 on the human umbilical vein cell extracellular matrix,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 800–808, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  58. V. Vogel, “Mechanotransduction involving multimodular proteins: converting force into biochemical signals,” Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, vol. 35, pp. 459–488, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  59. R. G. Flemming, C. J. Murphy, G. A. Abrams, S. L. Goodman, and P. F. Nealey, “Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior,” Biomaterials, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 573–588, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. A. Biela, Y. Su, J. P. Spatz, and R. Kemkemer, “Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 2460–2466, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. A. Curtis and C. Wilkinson, “Topographical control of cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 1573–1583, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. D. O. Meredith, L. Eschbach, M. O. Riehle, A. S. G. Curtis, and R. G. Richards, “Microtopography of metal surfaces influence fibroblast growth by modifying cell shape, cytoskeleton, and adhesion,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1523–1533, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  63. R. Barbucci, S. Lamponi, A. Magnani, and D. Pasqui, “Micropatterned surfaces for the control of endothelial cell behaviour,” Biomolecular Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2–6, pp. 161–170, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. A. G. Secchi, V. Grigoriou, I. M. Shapiro et al., “RGDS peptides immobilized on titanium alloy stimulate bone cell attachment, differentiation and confer resistance to apoptosis,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 577–584, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  65. M. M. Stevens and J. H. George, “Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5751, pp. 1135–1138, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  66. V. C. Hirschfeld-Warneken, M. Arnold, A. Cavalcanti-Adam, M López-García, H. Kessler, and J. P. Spatz, “Cell adhesion and polarisation on molecularly defined spacing gradient surfaces of cyclic RGDfK peptide patches,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 87, no. 8-9, pp. 743–750, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  67. K. A. Kilian, L. M. H. Lai, A. Magenau et al., “Smart tissue culture: in situ monitoring of the activity of protease enzymes secreted from live cells using nanostructured photonic crystals,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2021–2025, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  68. C. S. Chen, X. Jiang, and G. M. Whitesides, “Microengineering the environment of mammalian cells in culture,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 194–201, 2005. View at Google Scholar