Journal of Oncology

Journal of Oncology / 2010 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 617421 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/617421

Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells Detected by the CellSearch System in Patients with Metastatic Breast Colorectal and Prostate Cancer

Academic Editor: Tanja Fehm
Received08 Apr 2009
Accepted28 Sep 2009
Published09 Dec 2009

Abstract

The increasing number of treatment options for patients with metastatic carcinomas has created a concomitant need for new methods to monitor their use. Ideally, these modalities would be noninvasive, be independent of treatment, and provide quantitative real-time analysis of tumor activity in a variety of carcinomas. Assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) shed into the blood during metastasis may satisfy this need. We developed the CellSearch System to enumerate CTC from 7.5 mL of venous blood. In this review we compare the outcomes from three prospective multicenter studies investigating the use of CTC to monitor patients undergoing treatment for metastatic breast (MBC), colorectal (MCRC), or prostate cancer (MPC) and review the CTC definition used in these studies. Evaluation of CTC at anytime during the course of disease allows assessment of patient prognosis and is predictive of overall survival.

1. Introduction

In 1869 Thomas Ashworth, an Australian physician, after observing microscopically circulating tumor cells in the blood of a man with metastatic cancer, postulated that “. cells identical with those of the cancer itself being seen in the blood may tend to throw some light upon the mode of origin of multiple tumours existing in the same person.’’ After comparing the morphology of the circulating cells to tumor cells from different lesions Ashworth concluded that “One thing is certain, that if they [CTC] came from an existing cancer structure, they must have passed through the greater part of the circulatory system to have arrived at the internal saphena vein of the sound leg’’ [1]. Over the succeeding one hundred and forty years, cancer research has indeed demonstrated the critical role circulating tumor cells play in the metastatic spread of carcinomas [2]. However, it has only been shown recently—after development of technologies with the requisite sensitivity and reproducibility—that the diagnostic potential of these rare cells could be exploited [37].

To date, a variety of research methods have been developed to isolate and enumerate CTC [8]. The CellSearch Circulating Tumor Cell System has been validated via a rigorous clinical testing program [918] and is the only FDA cleared device for the enumeration of CTC in whole blood. The significance of the CellSearch assay results has been amply demonstrated, first in an extensive pilot study program and then in a series of prospective, well-controlled pivotal clinical trials. It is the agreement seen between CTC levels in patients with metastatic breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer and the true clinical endpoint overall survival that we will review.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Three prospective trials were conducted in clinical centers throughout the United States, The Netherlands, and the UK to evaluate the ability of CTC to predict PFS (Progression Free Survival) and OS (Overall Survival) in patients with MBC, MCRC, and MPC cancer. The principal inclusion criteria for the MBC and MCRC trials were measurable disease, while all patients in the MPC study had castration resistant disease defined as two consecutive increases in PSA despite standard hormonal management. Patients commencing a new first- or second-line cytotoxic therapy for MPC or MCRC and any new line of therapy for MBC were eligible. All patients had an ECOG performance status score of 0 to 2 and hemoglobin 8 g/dL. Patients with brain metastases or a history of other malignancies within the last five years were excluded.

All patients were enrolled on an Intent-to-Treat basis. The institutional review boards at each center approved the study protocol and all patients provided written informed consent. The CellSearch system was used to enumerate CTC in 177 MBC, 430 MCRC, and 231 MPC patients, respectively. 7.5 mL of blood was drawn from patients before starting a new line of therapy and at monthly intervals after initiation of therapy [1016]. An independent clinical research organization collected and monitored all clinical and laboratory data. Patients were followed up with regular chart review for up to 36 months from the time of the baseline blood draw for the survival analysis. For post-treatment samples, the measurement was taken from the time of the sample to avoid lead time bias. Patients were categorized prospectively as having either Unfavorable or Favorable CTC counts. For MBC and MPC, Unfavorable CTC were defined as 5 CTC/7.5 mL and for MCR 3 CTC/7.5 mL.

2.2. Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells

Blood samples were drawn into 10 mL evacuated blood draw tubes (CellSave, Veridex, Raritan, NJ), maintained at room temperature, and processed within 96 hours of collection. The evaluations were performed in a blinded fashion in one of four central laboratories (Veridex LLC, Huntingdon Valley, PA; Veridex LLC, Enschede, The Netherlands; IMPATH Predictive Oncology, Los Angeles, CA; and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH). The CellSearch System (Veridex LLC, Raritan, NJ) consists of the CellTracks Autoprep, CellTracks Magnest, CellSearch Epithelial Cell Kit, and the CellTracks Analyzer II. The CellSearch Epithelial Cell Kit contains ferrofluids labeled with the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), the staining reagents ,2-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI), CD45-Allophycocyan (CD45-APC), and cytokeratin 8,18 Phycoerythrin and cytokeratin 19 Phycoerythrin (CK-PE), buffers to enhance the cell capture [19, 20], and permeabilizes and fixes the cells.

The CellTracks Autoprep immunomagnetically enriches cells expressing EpCAM from 7.5 mL of blood, fluorescently labels the enriched cells with DAPI, CD45-APC, and CK-PE, and resuspends the cells in the cartridge placed in the CellTracks Magnest. The design of the magnets guides the magnetically labeled cells to the analysis surface [21] and the CellTracks Magnest containing the chamber is placed on the CellTracks Analyzer II. This semiautomated fluorescence-based microscopy system acquires images using a 10X NA0.45 objective with filters for DAPI, FITC (not used), PE and APC to cover the complete surface area of the analysis chamber. A computer identifies objects staining with DAPI and PE in the same location and generates images for the DAPI, FITC, PE, and APC filters. A reviewer selects the CTC defined as nucleated DAPI+ cells, lacking CD45 and expressing CK-PE from the gallery of objects which are tabulated by the computer. Accuracy, precision, linearity, and reproducibility of the CellSearch have been described elsewhere [17].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

For this study Kaplan-Meier plots were generated based on CTC at baseline and follow-up blood collections for survival analyses. Survival curves were compared using log-rank testing. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine univariate and multivariate hazards ratios for overall survival.

3. Results

3.1. Classification of Circulating Tumor Cells

Definitions of CTC vary widely between studies and have lead to a large range of reported CTC frequencies. CellSearch provides a highly standardized and automated platform to detect tumor cells in whole blood. In the CellSearch system final classification of CTC is performed by the operator and is the main contributor of the error of the assay [22]. Consistency in CTC classification among operators is therefore important. To illustrate that this can be challenging is illustrated by the images of 24 CTC candidates in Figure 1. Green represents the CK-PE staining and purple the DAPI staining. The corresponding APC and FITC images of the 24 candidates showed no staining. Only objects that are larger in size than the m yellow boxes can be classified by the operators as CTC. Most operators will have no problems assigning objects 1–8 as CTC and will discard objects 21–24. The latter is presented to the operator because of the presence of DAPI in the vicinity of a CK-PE positive object. Disagreement can occur when objects 9–20 are classified. Six operators that classified CTC in the three prospective multicenter studies were asked to classify the objects in Figure 1. The granulated objects in frames 9–12 clearly show features consistent with apoptosis [23]. All operators classified objects 9 and 10 as a CTC, 1 of 6 classified objects 11 as a CTC, and 5 of 6 classified objects 12 as a CTC. The small objects 13–16 were classified as CTC by all operators. Similar to the objects 9–12, objects 17–20 show the granulated CK-PE only; now the objects are smaller. All operators classified object 17 as a CTC, none classified object 20 as a CTC, and 5 of 6 classified objects 18 and 19 as a CTC.

3.2. Frequency of Circulating Tumor Cells in Cancer Patients and Controls

The frequency of CTC in 7.5 mL of blood from 295 normal donors, 255 patients with benign disease, and 177 MRC, 413 CRC, and 218 MPC patients before initiation of a new line therapy is shown in Table 1. Only a small fraction of the objects presented by the computer to the operator are classified as CTC. This is illustrated in Table 2 showing the average, standard deviation, and median number of events detected by the software as CK+ and DAPI+ in blood from normal donors, patients with benign disease, MBC, MCRC, and MPC patients with 0 CTC, 1–4 CTC, and 5 or more CTC in 7.5 mL of blood.


Percentage of patients with CTC above threshold
# pat 1 5 10 50 100 500 1000

Normal2953.40.00.00.00.00.00.0
Benign2557.50.40.40.00.00.00.0
Breast17770.649.738.420.915.83.42.8
Colorectal41347.518.211.62.41.00.00.0
Prostate21877.557.345.020.613.83.72.3


CTC
0 1– < 5 5
𝑛 meanSDmed 𝑛 meanSDmed 𝑛 meanSDMed

Normal2855368401081108420
Benign236383030184426471159159
Breast505329293673933886403118284
Colorectal217223107078121266468116756031620230
Prostate494201713864422235810112513013020412

3.3. Relation between the Presence of CTC and Overall Survival (OS) in MBC, MCRC, and MPC

For MBC and MPC a threshold of 5 CTC/7.5 mL and for MCRC a threshold of 3 CTC/7.5 mL were used to stratify patients into those with Favorable outcomes (CTC 3 or 5) and those with Unfavorable outcomes (CTC 3 or 5). The Kaplan Meier curves in Figure 2 show the probability of OS for patients with Favorable and Unfavorable CTC counts before the initiation of therapy. Median OS for MBC, MCRC, and MPC patients with Favorable CTC was 21.9 (95% CI: 20.1–28.6), 18.5 (95% CI: 15.2–21.2), and 21.7 (95% CI: 21.3–NR) months, respectively. In contrast median OS for MBC, MCRC, and MPC patients with Unfavorable CTC was 10.9 (95% CI: 7.0–15.2), 9.4(95% CI: 7.5–11.6), and 11.5 (95% CI: 9.3–13.7) months, respectively. The differences are highly significant with logrank -values .0001.

Figure 3 shows the Kaplan Meier curves of the probability of OS for patients with Favorable and Unfavorable CTC counts at monthly intervals after initiation of therapy. At all time points tested the difference in survival between the Favorable and Unfavorable groups is highly significant (logrank -values .0070). CTCs thus predict outcomes at any time during treatment and can be used to monitor treatment.

To answer whether or not a change in CTC “after’’ treatment can alter survival prospects, further Kaplan Meier analyses were performed and shown in Figure 4. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) CTCs remain Favorable (green lines); (2) CTCs remain Unfavorable (red lines); (3) CTCs change from Favorable to Unfavorable (orange lines); (4) CTCs change from Unfavorable to Favorable during the course of therapy (blue lines). In all three cancers, patients with persistent CTC counts had the worst outcome and strongly suggested that they were on a futile therapy. Also patients that develop CTC during the course of therapy convert to a poor prognosis, similar to those with Unfavorable CTC before and after therapy. In contrast patient’s prognosis improved for those converting from the Unfavorable to the Favorable group. This was the strongest for MPC.

In both univariate and multivariate analysis CTC levels at all time points were significantly associated with overall survival [10, 13, 15].

4. Discussion

In most cases death from cancer is not caused by expansion of the primary tumor, but through dissemination of the disease. To settle in distant sites tumor cells must travel through the peripheral blood; question is at what frequency. In routine analysis of 104 leukocytes ( 1  L of blood) tumor cells are not observed. Using immunomagnetic enrichment from 20 mL of blood followed by flowcytometric analysis we were able to identify CTCs in blood from most carcinoma patients [24, 25].

To minimize error in CTC enumeration the sample preparation steps needed to be automated. A blood volume of 7.5 mL was chosen for the development of the standardized CellSearch CTC enumeration system as this could be routinely obtained from a 10 mL draw tube. The automated system utilizes immunomagnetic nanoparticles directed against the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) to isolate and concentrate epithelial tumor cells [17, 19]. Once enriched, the cells are identified using epithelial cell specific fluorescently labeled anticytokeratin (CK) monoclonal antibodies, the nuclear stain (DAPI), and absence of the pan-leukocyte counter stain (CD45-APC). It should be noted that assay success is dependent upon the level of expression of the EpCAM and Cytokeratin target antigens which can vary significantly [8]. We have investigated these issues and have demonstrated that although antigen expression varies considerable, the assay is capable of functioning within a wide range of EpCAM and cytokeratin levels [19, 20].

To reduce the background observed in blood from healthy donors flowcytometry used in our original work [24, 25] was replaced by fluorescence microscopy. The addition of morphology to the CTC definition indeed increased the specificity but was accompanied by a reduction of the CTC frequency in cancer patients. In model systems 1 tumor cell spiked into 7.5 mL of blood containing leukocytes and erythrocytes can be identified and recovery of spiked tumor cells is 80% [17, 19, 20]. Whereas the morphology of cells from tumor cell lines is relatively homogenous, a large heterogeneity is observed in tumor cells in blood from cancer patients. This heterogeneity introduces variation in the assignment of EpCAM+, Cytokeratin 8,18, or 19, CD45−, DAPI+ objects as CTC by the operator [22]. The most likely explanation for the large variation in the reported frequency of CTC by different methods using a similar phenotypic definition is the differences in the actual definition of a CTC [2330]. That less stringent criterion for CTCs results in a significant increase in the reported numbers as illustrated in Table 2 showing the number of EpCAM enriched CK+DAPI+ events for patients with zero, 1–4, and 5 or more CTC. The CellSearch definition of a CTC was set before the initiation and validated by prospective clinical studies in MBC, MCRP, and MPC. Further studies will be needed to determine the value, if any, of the CK+ DAPI+ events detected that were not classified as CTC.

The prospective multicenter studies in MBC, MCRC, and MPC demonstrated that presence of CTC was a strong predictor of poor outcome; see Figure 2. Even after a few weeks of therapy, patients with Unfavorable CTC had much shorter overall survival than did patients with Favorable CTC; see Figure 3. Effective therapies—ones that result in elimination of CTC—can prolong survival, irrespective of the line of therapy, as shown by the improvement in overall survival in patients with MBC, MCRC, and MPC that converted from an Unfavorable to Favorable CTC count; see Figure 4. This benefit was seen in patients independent of line of therapy, indicating that treatment can still be effective in patients that have failed a previous therapy. Today, the current standard of care calls for routine assessments of a patient’s clinical status at or about one-month intervals depending on the type of therapy. Imaging studies are an exception as they are usually performed at some intermediate time point and at the end of a given line of therapy. Consequently most clinicians do not entertain a change in treatment until after several cycles of drug have been administered. It is also felt that a certain minimum time, usually two to three cycles of therapy is often needed before clinical benefit may be evident. Thus the advantages associated with changing treatment at a significantly earlier time point must be demonstrated.

In this review we only addressed the clinical relevance of CTC detected in patients with metastatic disease. Although CTC can also be detected with the CellSearch in the adjuvant setting and primary setting albeit at a lower frequency, no prospective clinical trials have been concluded to determine its clinical relevance [31].

5. Conclusions

CellSearch is a validated system to enumerate Circulating Tumor Cells in 7.5 mL of blood. In prospective multicenter studies in metastatic breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer the presence of CTC before and after initiation of a new line of therapy was the strongest predictor of poor overall survival.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Madeline Repollet, Claudia Rojas, Helaine Krueger, Frances Tanney, Bjorn Lunter, and Joost Swennenhuis for processing the samples for multicenter study and score the images presented in Figure 1.

References

  1. T. R. Ashworth, “A case of cancer in which cells similar to those in the tumours were seen in the blood after death,” The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 14, pp. 146–147, 1869. View at: Google Scholar
  2. I. J. Fidler, “The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 453–458, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Sleijfer, J.-W. Gratama, A. M. Sieuwerts, J. Kraan, J. W. M. Martens, and J. A. Foekens, “Circulating tumour cell detection on its way to routine diagnostic implementation?” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 2645–2650, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. F. Hayes and J. R. Smerage, “Is there a role for circulating tumor cells in the management of breast cancer?” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3646–3650, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. Pantel, C. Alix-Panabières, and S. Riethdorf, “Cancer micrometastases,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 339–351, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Pantel and S. Riethdorf, “Pathology: are circulating tumor cells predictive of overall survival?” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 190–191, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. Panteleakou, P. Lembessis, A. Sourla et al., “Detection of circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer patients: methodological pitfalls and clinical relevance,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 101–114, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Paterlini-Brechot and N. L. Benali, “Circulating tumor cells (CTC) detection: clinical impact and future directions,” Cancer Letters, vol. 253, no. 2, pp. 180–204, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Veridex LLC, “CellSearch circulating tumor cell kit premarket notification-expanded indications for use—metastatic prostate cancer,” http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf7/K073338.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. Cristofanilli, G. T. Budd, M. J. Ellis et al., “Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 8, pp. 781–791, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. T. Budd, M. Cristofanilli, M. Ellis et al., “Circulating tumor cells versus imaging—predicting overall survival in metastatic breast cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 6403–6409, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. F. Hayes, M. Cristofanilli, G. T. Budd et al., “Circulating tumor cells at each follow-up time point during therapy of metastatic breast cancer patients predict progression-free and overall survival,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 14, part 1, pp. 4218–4224, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. J. Cohen, C. J. A. Punt, N. Iannotti et al., “Relationship of circulating tumor cells to tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 19, pp. 3213–3221, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. J. Cohen, C. J. A. Punt, N. Iannotti et al., “Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1223–1229, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. S. de Bono, H. I. Scher, R. B. Montgomery et al., “Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 6302–6309, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. I. Scher, X. Jia, J. S. de Bono et al., “Circulating tumour cells as prognostic markers in progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: a reanalysis of IMMC38 trial data,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 233–239, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W. J. Allard, J. Matera, M. C. Miller et al., “Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 6897–6904, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Riethdorf, H. Fritsche, V. Müller et al., “Detection of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a validation study of the cell search system,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 920–928, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. G. Rao, D. Chianese, G. V. Doyle et al., “Expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule in carcinoma cells present in blood and primary and metastatic tumors,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. W. M. M. Terstappen, G. C. Rao, and P. A. Liberti, “Increased separation efficiency via controlled aggregation of magnetic nanoparticles,” US patent no. 6,551,843 B1, April 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  21. A. G. J. Tibbe, B. G. de Grooth, J. Greve, G. J. Dolan, G. C. Rao, and L. W. M. M. Terstappen, “Magnetic field design for selecting and aligning immunomagnetic labeled cells,” Cytometry, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 163–172, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. G. J. Tibbe, M. C. Miller, and L. W. M. M. Terstappen, “Statistical considerations for enumeration of circulating tumor cells,” Cytometry A, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 154–162, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. J. Larson, J. G. Moreno, K. J. Pienta et al., “Apoptosis of circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer patients,” Cytometry A, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. W. M. M. Terstappen, C. G. Rao, S. Gross et al., “Flowcytometry—principles and feasibility in transfusion medicine. Enumeration of epithelial derived tumor cells in peripheral blood,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 74, supplement 2, pp. 269–274, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  25. E. Racila, D. Euhus, A. J. Weiss et al., “Detection and characterization of carcinoma cells in the blood,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 4589–4594, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Nagrath, L. V. Sequist, S. Maheswaran et al., “Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology,” Nature, vol. 450, no. 7173, pp. 1235–1239, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Pachmann, O. Camara, A. Kavallaris et al., “Monitoring the response of circulating epithelial tumor cells to adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer allows detection of patients at risk of early relapse,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1208–1215, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. J. Kahn, A. Presta, L.-Y. Yang et al., “Enumeration of circulating tumor cells in the blood of breast cancer patients after filtration enrichment: correlation with disease stage,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 237–247, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. T. Krivacic, A. Ladanyi, D. N. Curry et al., “A rare-cell detector for cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 29, pp. 10501–10504, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. B. Hsieh, D. Marrinucci, K. Bethel et al., “High speed detection of circulating tumor cells,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1893–1899, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. R. de Groot, H. M. Croonen, and W. J. T. Mastboom, “Circulating tumor cells (CTC) in newly diagnosed breast or colorectal cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, supplement 18, 2007, Abstract no. 14512. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 M. Craig Miller et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

8957 Views | 3652 Downloads | 394 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder