Journal of Oncology

Journal of Oncology / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 901783 |

Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro, Yoko Oka, Takuji Matsuo, Tadashi Yamamoto, Toshihiko Sugao, Nobu Akiyama, Kazuo Kawasugi, Naoki Shirafuji, "Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cells Contribute to the Stromal Myofibroblasts in Leukemic NOD/SCID Mouse In Vivo", Journal of Oncology, vol. 2012, Article ID 901783, 8 pages, 2012.

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cells Contribute to the Stromal Myofibroblasts in Leukemic NOD/SCID Mouse In Vivo

Academic Editor: Jose R. Conejo-Garcia
Received10 Apr 2012
Revised13 Jun 2012
Accepted14 Jun 2012
Published15 Jul 2012


We recently reported that chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells converted into myofibroblasts to create a microenvironment for proliferation of CML cells in vitro. To analyze a biological contribution of CML-derived myofibroblasts in vivo, we observed the characters of leukemic nonobese diabetes/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mouse. Bone marrow nonadherent mononuclear cells as well as human CD45-positive cells obtained from CML patients were injected to the irradiated NOD/SCID mice. When the chimeric BCR-ABL transcript was demonstrated in blood, human CML cells were detected in NOD/SCID murine bone marrow. And CML-derived myofibroblasts composed with the bone marrow-stroma, which produced significant amounts of human vascular endothelial growth factor A. When the parental CML cells were cultured with myofibroblasts separated from CML cell-engrafted NOD/SCID murine bone marrow, CML cells proliferated significantly. These observations indicate that CML cells make an adequate microenvironment for their own proliferation in vivo.

1. Introduction

A bone marrow stromal tissue forms a specific environment, called niche, to generate and grow hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells [1, 2]. Bone marrow stroma is mainly created by a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC); however, a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) and MSC have a crosstalk with each other. MSC is reported to differentiate into various kinds of cells such as chondrocytes, osteocytes, monocytes, adipocytes, and pericytes and which expresses CD29, CD44, CD71, CD90, CD105, CD106, CD166, Stro-1, and ICAM-1, but do not show CD34 and CD45 [35]. A fibroblast/myofibroblast (Fib), an important component that constructs a stroma, has been reported to be derived from MSC and not from HSC [610]. Recently, Shirai and colleagues reported that Fibs are also generated from HSCs in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) [11], given this finding and the traditional dogma that Fibs are of MSC origin, the specific origin of Fibs is controversial, and it is possible that normal Fibs originate from HSC [12].

Fibs are also reported to construct tumor niche. An endothelial cell surrounding a tumor expresses similar cell surface markers to that of an original tumor [13]. Experimentally, xenograft transplantation model with using an immunodeficiency mouse in vivo indicates that a chromosomal aberration observed in an original tumor is demonstrated in vascular endothelial cells when transplanted human melanoma cells and liposarcoma cells [14]. When lymphoma cells are transplanted to a mouse, intratumor vasculature shows similar chromosomal aberration to that of the original lymphoma cells [15]. MSCs are also reported to have a similar genetical abnormality to the original tumor [16]. Thus, it is possible that a tumor-forming cell can differentiate into a stromal cell.

Recently, we reported that bone marrow nonadherent mononuclear cells, collected from acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients with MLL-ELL translocation and CML patients, converted morphologically and functionally into myofibroblasts when observed primary long-term culture in vitro [17, 18]. We also observed that leukemic cells created a microenvironment for proliferation by converting to myofibroblasts.

Hematologic malignant disorders as well as normal hematopoiesis have been analyzed using nonobese diabetes/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mouse system in vivo [1921]. To determine whether CML cells differentiated into stromal myofibroblasts in vivo, CML cells were transplanted to NOD/SCID mice, and the stromal contribution of CML cells was observed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Cells

Our institutional ethical committee approved this study using clinical samples and experimental animals. Bone marrow cells were collected from informed CML patients admitted to our hospital and newly diagnosed with CML or from healthy volunteers. Samples were centrifuged in Ficoll-Paque (S.G. 1077, Lymphoprep, Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Norway) to prepare a mononuclear cell fraction. One-day culture in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Nissui, Japan) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, CELLect GOLD; MP Biomedicals, Germany) eliminated an adherent cell-fraction, and a non-adherent mononuclear cell fraction was used for transplantation. Cells were also incubated with anti-human CD45 antibody-(Ab-) coated magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotech, Germany) based on the manufacturer’s instructions, and the separated cells were also used for transplantation [18].

2.2. In Vivo Transplantation to NOD/SCID Mice

NOD/SCID mice were purchased from Japan Charles River Inc., and mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free room and were fed germ-free water and food containing antibiotics. After whole body irradiation of 2.5 Gray, mice were injected with non-adherent mononuclear cells from CML patients by tail vein. For the inactivation of NK cells, mice were injected intraperitoneally with antiasialo GM1 Ab (100 μL/mice) (WAKO, Japan) prior to the transplantation and on each 11th day thereafter. Blood from mice were monitored for BCR-ABL fusion molecules with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). When the fusion mRNA was detected, mice were sacrificed and bone marrow cells and spleen cells were obtained. RNA was extracted from the indicated cells (Qiagen, CA, USA) the first strand cDNA was synthesized with an oligo-dT primer using a first-strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA), and RT-PCR was employed [22]. The primers used included major BCR 1st and 2nd, ABL 1st and 2nd, human CD13, CD33, CD34, CD133, CD106, fibroblast specific protein-1 (FSP1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A, VEGF receptor type 1, type 2, and GAPDH [17, 18, 23, 24]. The PCR products were analyzed on a 2.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and were recovered with a GeneClean Kit (MD Biomedicals, OH, USA). A cDNA sequence of the fusion product was determined using a BigDye terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems (AB), CA, USA), and was analyzed with an ABI PRISM 3700 DNA analyzer (AB) [11].

2.3. Biological Characterization of the Engrafted CML Cells

Magnetic selections of the engrafted CML-derived fraction and CML-derived Fib-rich one were prepared with anti-human CD34 Ab-coated magnetic beads, and anti-human D7-FIB Ab-coated magnetic beads [25, 26], respectively, as per the manufacturer’s direction (Miltenyi). The separated positive cells were cultured for one week, and the morphology was observed. To detect the transplanted human CML cells, anti-human CD13 Ab (Becton Dickinson (BD), CA, USA) and CD33 Ab (BD) were used. Anti-human CD133 Ab (Miltenyi), CD106 Ab (BD), were employed for the detection of human Fibs and analyzed with Cell Sorter (Beckman Coulter (BC), CA, USA). The procedures for immunocytochemical staining were reported previously [17, 18]. The antibodies used included anti-human smooth muscle actin (SMA) Ab (diluted with phosphate-buffered saline at 1 : 200, DAKO, Denmark), fibronectin Ab (1 : 200, Immunotech, BC), and FSP1 (also called S100) Ab (1 : 200, BD).

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was performed as reported previously, in which the 5′ portion of BCR and the 3′ part of ABL were labeled with SpectrumGreen (green) and SpectrumOrange (red), respectively (Abbott, IL, USA). Normal cells appeared split red and green signals, while cells having the translocation gave yellow because of the fusion of the 5′ and 3′ signals [18].

Cytokine production was assayed.The human VEGF-A immunoassay kit (Quantikine R&D Systems, MN, USA) was obtained commercially, and culturing supernatants after a 72-hour culture of the indicated myofibroblasts at 1 × 105/mL in a 6-well plate (NUNC, NY, USA) that were priory starved for 24 hours were quantified according to the manufacturers’ instructions [24].

Cell-proliferation was assayed. Non-adherent mononuclear cells were suspended in DMEM with 10% FCS to a concentration of 1 × 106/mL for bone marrow cells from CML patients in the chronic (CP) and accelerated phase (AP), and 1 × 105/mL for those in normal bone-marrow-derived CD34-positive cells and the blast crisis phase (BC). One hundred microliters of the cell suspension were cultured in a 96-well flat-bottomed plate (Corning Incorporated, Costar, NY, USA) with or without NOD/SCID murine bone-marrow-derived Fib layers, and anti-human VEGF-A-neutralizing Ab (Sigma, MO, USA). When cells were cultured on the feeder layers, indicated adherent Fibs (1 × 103/well) were irradiated before-culture at 30 Gray (Hitachi MBR-15, Japan) [18], and the cell proliferation was assayed with a Cell Counting Kit (Dojindo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Parental CML cells or normal bone-marrow-derived non-adherent CD34-positive cells were also cultured in myofibroblast-layered 35 mm petri dishes (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) for one day to adhere to the feeder layers, and dishes were gently washed three times to discard non-adherent cells. Cells were cultured for seven days, and the appearance was photographed. And cell foci (immature cell-clusters or colonies that adhered to the feeder layers after washing thoroughly) were counted microscopically.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean. The significance of differences among the groups was determined using Student’s 𝑡 -test, and is indicated with an asterisk ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ).

3. Results

3.1. Engraftment of the Injected Human CML Cells

Five CML patients (2 CP, 2 AP, and one myeloid BC) gave informed consent for the collection of bone marrow cells for analysis. Mononuclear cells were separated and cultured for one day to eliminate the adherent cell fraction, and the non-adherent fraction was removed and injected to NOD/SCID mice. Cells were also incubated with anti-human CD45 Ab-coated magnetic beads to eliminate stromal cells. Above 95% of non-adherent cells showed CD45 weakly positive or positive in all five cases. The morphology of the non-adherent cells from a patient of AP is shown in Figure 1(a). These cells expressed CD13 and CD33 (Figure 1(b), AP case). CD13/CD33 double positive cells were 12% and 18% in CP; 22% and 26% in AP; 81% in BC. In FISH analysis BCR-ABL fusion signal was observed (Figure 1(c)). BCR-ABL fusion signal-positive cells were 95 to 100% in all cases.

The transplanted NOD/SCID mice were monitored their blood employing RT-PCR to identify Bcr-Abl fusion product that was expressed in the injected CML cells. After 2 months, Bcr-Abl fusion RNA was detected in blood (Figure 2(a)), and mice were sacrificed to detect human CML cells in murine bone marrow. Spleen was enlarged in CML cell-engrafted NOD/SCID mouse (Figure 2(b)). RT-PCR analysis yielded similar results for molecular expressions between injected CML cells and the engrafted CML cells (Figure 2(a)), in which CD13 and CD33 (human myeloid markers that were also expressed in the injected CML cells) and CD34 and CD133 (human stem cell markers that were expressed in the injected CML cells) were detected in the engrafted murine bone marrow cells. Also, CD106 and FSP1 (human stromal markers that were expressed in human bone marrow adherent cells) were expressed in the engrafted murine bone marrow. CML-engrafted NOD/SCID murine bone marrow cells expressed CD34 and CD133 at protein level (Figure 2(c)). To isolate human CML cells, CML cell-engrafted NOD/SCID murine bone marrow cells were incubated with anti-human CD34 Ab-coated magnetic beads. The microscopical morphology after separation is shown in Figure 2(e), in which human CD13 and CD33 double positive immature myeloid CML cells were observed in the transplanted NOD/SCID murine bone marrow (Figure 2(d)). To observe a contribution of the engrafted human CML cell-derived myofibroblasts to a NOD/SCID murine bone marrow stroma, separated CD34-positive cells were further selected with anti-human D7-FIB Ab-coated magnetic beads. The positive fraction after bead separation was analyzed with anti-human CD133 Ab and CD106 Ab (Figure 3(a)), in which 73% of the selected cells was double-positive for these two Abs when CML AP cells were injected. This double-positive cell fraction was 56% when CML CP cells were injected and 80% in BC cells, whereas below 1% was detected in normal human bone marrow cells. When the selected cells were cultured, cells were morphologically myofibroblasts, and similar to that of culturing Fibs in vitro (Figure 3(b)). Immunocytochemical staining revealed that the generated cells expressed human fibronectin, SMA, and S100, which are expressed in normal bone marrow myofibroblasts (Figure 3(c)). With FISH analysis BCR-ABL fusion gene was detected in these Fibs (Figure 3(d)). When CML cells (one CP and one AP) were selected with anti-human CD45 Ab-coated magnetic beads and transplanted to NOD/SCID mouse, CML cells were engrafted equally, and Fibs were also contributed to NOD/SCID murine bone marrow, in which CD133(+)CD106(+) cells occupied 65% (CP) and 82% (AP), respectively, in the total CD34(+)D7-FIB(+) cells.

When non-adherent mononuclear cells prepared from CML patients were transplanted to NOD/SCID mice, engraftment was observed in 3 cases out of five (one CP, one AP, and one BC). The remaining two were dead because of bacterial infection at day 7 and day 8, respectively. When CD45-selected CML cells (one CP and one AP) were transplanted, two cases were engrafted.

3.2. Characterization of the Isolated CML-Derived Fibs

For the functional characterization, cytokine production was assayed using the supernatants of the cultured Fibs that carry BCR-ABL fusion chromosome (SCID (+)-Fibs). In vitro observation indicated that VEGF-A system plays important role in the proliferation of CML cells [18]. Thus, we focused on VEGF-A system. Figure 4(b) shows the results, in which separated SCID (+)-Fibs derived from CML cell-engrafted NOD/SCID murine bone marrow produced human VEGF-A significantly compared with that of other Fibs ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ). Receptors for these cytokines were examined employing RT-PCR, in which the analyzed CML cells expressed VEGF receptor type 1, and type 2 (Figure 4(a)). To validate whether SCID (+)-Fibs stimulated to grow parental CML cells, CML cells as well as normal bone-marrow-derived CD34-positive cells were cultured on a feeder layer of Fibs, washed to completely discard cells that did not adhere to the Fibs, and further cultured (Figure 4(c)). When the parental CML cells were cultured on SCID (+)-Fibs, multiple leukemic cell foci were observed; however, when the parental CML cells were cultured on Fibs from control NOD/SCID mice, no blast foci were noted and matured cells were observed to be floating (Figure 4(c)-(1)). When normal bone-marrow-derived CD34-positive non-adherent mononuclear cells, immature hematopoietic cells at HSC level were cultured on SCID (+)-Fibs, a few cell foci were observed (Figure 4(c)-(3)). Cell foci were microscopically counted, in which 11 foci were counted in CD34-positive cell-input group, whereas 42 foci in CML cell group. No cell-foci were observed when CML cells were cultured with control NOD/SCID murine-bone marrow-derived Fibs. To validate VEGF-A-mediated activation in this system, cell-proliferation was assayed, in which the parental CML cells showed growth-promoting activity when cells were cultured with SCID (+)-Fibs. And when human VEGF-A neutralizing Ab was added to the cultures, cell-growth was inhibited ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 ) (Figure 4(d)).

4. Discussion

We have shown in the present study that CML cells from the patients’ bone marrow were engrafted in NOD/SCID mice to induce leukemia, in which human CML cells generated stromal myofibroblasts in NOD/SCID murine bone marrow, and functionally similar to that of CML cells generated in vitro in terms of their production of VEGF-A, and in supporting the proliferation to the parental CML cells.

To recapture the characteristics of de novo CML, the leukemic NOD/SCID mouse system was used. NOD/SCID mouse maintained the de novo CML characters without any cytokine supplementation in our experiment. We previously reported that VEGF-A system played an important role in the creation of microenvironment for proliferation of CML cells in vitro [18]. VEGF is one of important cytokines that regulate normal and abnormal hematopoiesis. Several reports indicate that VEGF-A system plays an important role in proliferation of hematological malignant cells with an autocrine or paracrine fashion [24, 2730]. We identified that CML cell-derived stromal Fibs produced a high amount of VEGF-A in vitro and also in vivo. And CML cells expressed VEGF-A receptors. When the parental CML cells were cultured on SCID (+)-Fib in vivo, blastic CML cells grew significantly; however, when the parental CML cells were cultured on the control NOD/SCID murine bone-marrow-derived Fibs, expansion of immature cells were very low level, and cells were differentiated. Normal human bone-marrow-derived immature cells also grew on SCID (+)-Fib to make a few cell foci. These observations indicate that CML cells differentiate and create an adequate microenvironment for their growth and may behave like nonmutated HSCs. Further investigations will reveal the real characteristics of CML stem cells and their myofibroblastic conversion.

5. Conclusion

When CML cells were transplanted and engrafted to the irradiated NOD/SCID mice, CML cell-derived BCR-ABL-carrying myofibroblasts composed with NOD/SCID murine bone marrow stroma and made an adequate microenvironment for proliferation of parental CML cells in vivo.


The authors thank Dr. Shigeo Mori for teaching them immunocytochemical staining of the cultured cells, Ms. Mayumi Higuchi for teaching them of cell sorting, and Ms. Keiko Kinoshita for secretarial assistance.


  1. C. Lo Celso, H. E. Fleming, J. W. Wu et al., “Live-animal tracking of individual haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in their niche,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7225, pp. 92–96, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Xie, T. Yin, W. Wiegraebe et al., “Detection of functional haematopoietic stem cell niche using real-time imaging,” Nature, vol. 457, no. 7225, pp. 97–101, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Chamberlain, J. Fox, B. Ashton, and J. Middleton, “Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing,” Stem Cells, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2739–2749, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. L. MacMillan, B. R. Blazar, T. E. DeFor, and J. E. Wagner, “Transplantation of ex-vivo culture-expanded parental haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells to promote engraftment in pediatric recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood: results of a phase I-II clinical trial,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 447–454, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Sugiyama, H. Kohara, M. Noda, and T. Nagasawa, “Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches,” Immunity, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 977–988, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Awaya, K. Rupert, E. Bryant, and B. Torok-Storb, “Failure of adult marrow-derived stem cells to generate marrow stroma after successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 937–942, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Baddoo, K. Hill, R. Wilkinson et al., “Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from murine bone marrow by negative selection,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1235–1249, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Flores-Figueroa, R. M. Arana-Trejo, G. Gutiérrez-Espíndola, A. Pérez-Cabrera, and H. Mayani, “Mesenchymal stem cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: phenotypic and cytogenetic characterization,” Leukemia Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 215–224, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Jootar, N. Pornprasertsud, S. Petvises et al., “Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells from chronic myeloid leukemia t(9;22) patients are devoid of Philadelphia chromosome and support cord blood stem cell expansion,” Leukemia Research, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1493–1498, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. J. Prockop, “Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues,” Science, vol. 276, no. 5309, pp. 71–74, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Shirai, Y. Sera, W. Bulkeley et al., “Hematopoietic stem cell origin of human fibroblasts: cell culture studies of female recipients of gender-mismatched stem cell transplantation and patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1464–1471, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Ogawa, A. C. LaRue, and C. J. Drake, “Hematopoietic origin of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts: its pathophysiologic implications,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 2893–2896, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. B. Carson-Walter, D. N. Watkins, A. Nanda, B. Vogelstein, K. W. Kinzler, and B. S. Croix, “Cell surface tumor endothelial markers are conserved in mice and humans,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 6649–6655, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. Hida and M. Klagsbrun, “A new perspective on tumor endothelial cells: unexpected chromosome and centrosome abnormalities,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 2507–2510, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Streubel, A. Chott, D. Huber et al., “Lymphoma-specific genetic aberrations in microvascular endothelial cells in B-cell lymphomas,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 3, pp. 250–259, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. L. Spaeth, J. L. Dembinski, A. K. Sasser et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell transition to tumor-associated fibroblasts contributes to fibrovascular network expansion and tumor progression,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID e4992, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. Shirasaki, H. Tashiro, M. Mizutani-Noguchi, K. Kawasugi, and N. Shirafuji, “Chronic myelogenous leukemia cells convert to myofibroblasts in vitro: effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on development of the microenvironment,” Leukemia Research, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 663–669, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. Tashiro, M. Mizutani-Noguchi, R. Shirasaki, and N. Shirafuji, “Acute myelogenous leukemia cells with the MLL-ELL translocation convert morphologically and functionally into adherent myofibroblasts,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 391, no. 1, pp. 592–597, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Bonnet and J. E. Dick, “Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell,” Nature Medicine, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 730–737, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. P. Steele, R. D. Clutterbuck, R. L. Powles et al., “Growth of human T-cell lineage acute leukemia in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice and non-obese diabetic SCID mice,” Blood, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 2015–2019, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  21. W. Tepstra, A. Prins, T. Visser et al., “Conditions for engraftment of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in SCID mice,” Leukemia, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1573–1577, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  22. N. Shirafuji, S. Takahashi, S. Matsuda, and S. Asano, “Mitochondrial antisense RNA for cytochrome C oxidase (MARCO) can induce morphologic changes and cell death in human hematopoietic cell lines,” Blood, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 4567–4577, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  23. N. C. Cross, J. V. Melo, L. Feng, and J. M. Goldman, “An optimized multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of BCR-ABL fusion mRNAs in haematological disorders,” Leukemia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 186–189, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  24. Y. Oka, H. Tashiro, R. Shirasaki et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor acted as autocrine growth factor in an acute promyelocytic leukemia case,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 717–719, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. C. Fearns and E. B. Dowdle, “The desmoplastic response: induction of collagen synthesis by melanoma cells in vitro,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 621–627, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  26. E. A. Jones, S. E. Kinsey, A. English et al., “Isolation and characterization of bone marrow multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3349–3360, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. W. Fiedler, U. Graeven, S. Ergün et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor, a possible paracrine growth factor in human acute myeloid leukemia,” Blood, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1870–1875, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. W. Hussong, G. M. Rodgers, and P. J. Shami, “Evidence of increased angiogenesis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia,” Blood, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 309–313, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  29. A. R. Kini, L. A. Peterson, M. S. Tallman, and M. W. Lingen, “Angiogenesis in acute promyelocytic leukemia: induction by vascular endothelial growth factor and inhibition by all-trans retinoic acid,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3919–3924, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Masood, J. Cai, T. Zheng, D. Lynne Smith, D. R. Hinton, and P. S. Gill, “Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an autocrine growth factor for VEGF receptor-positive human tumors,” Blood, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1904–1913, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Ryosuke Shirasaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles