Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Oncology
Volume 2018, Article ID 6214838, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6214838
Review Article

Glucose and Lactate Transport in Pancreatic Cancer: Glycolytic Metabolism Revisited

Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health Sciences Center, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Jose G. Trevino; ude.lfu.yregrus@onivert.esoj

Received 26 July 2018; Revised 13 November 2018; Accepted 21 November 2018; Published 4 December 2018

Academic Editor: Thomas E. Adrian

Copyright © 2018 Miles E. Cameron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Membrane transporters fulfill essential roles in maintaining normal cellular function in health. In cancer, transporters likewise facilitate the aberrant characteristics typical of proliferating tumor cells. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is remarkable in its aggressiveness, and its metabolism is supported by a variety of membrane transporters. Glucose transporter 1 is upregulated in pancreatic cancer, enables rapid cellular uptake of glucose, and contributes to the invasiveness and metastatic ability of the disease. Likewise, the machinery of glycolysis, enzymes such as pyruvate kinase type M2 and hexokinase 2, is particularly active and ultimately leads to both lactate and tumor formation. Lactic acid channels and transporters include monocarboxylate transporters 1 and 4, connexin43, and CD147. In conjunction with glucose transporters and glycolytic metabolism, lactic acid transport helps perpetuate tumor cell metabolism and contributes to the formation of the unique tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer. These transporters may serve as potential therapeutic targets.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a horrible disease with a five-year survival of 8% [1]. In spite of ongoing research, there have been few clinical improvements over the past 50 years. One familiar observation in many cancers, including PDAC, is a profound reprogramming of cellular metabolism. When this reprogramming involves a transition to aerobic glycolysis, it is commonly referred to as the Warburg effect. As with all cells, energy in the form of ATP is derived from glucose. Tumors exhibiting the Warburg effect however do not fully oxidize glucose to its potential. This feature has recently received renewed attention in the literature. Accordingly, this review focuses specifically on the metabolite transporters that are active in PDAC, namely, the conduits of glucose and lactic acid. Their roles in facilitating abnormal metabolism, formation of the tumor microenvironment, and possible therapeutic implications are discussed.

2. Glycolysis and Glucose Transporters

It has been well known for decades that malignant cells require high levels of glucose compared to normal cells. In a phenomenon first described by Otto Warburg in the 1920s, glycolysis is often the dominant source of ATP, even in oxygen-rich conditions [2]. This is now known as the Warburg effect, and it characterizes the use of inefficient metabolism by cancer cells. To further emphasize the issue, metabolic reprogramming was recognized as an emerging “hallmark of cancer” by Hanahan and Weinberg in 2011 [3]. The possible advantages of this reprogramming have been extensively discussed, but the Warburg effect and other characteristic phenotypes of cancer metabolism are not completely understood. There must be benefits in addition to ATP production that cancer cells receive from what are otherwise inefficient means. Glycolytic intermediates serve as precursors of nucleotides, phospholipids, and other biomolecules via the pentose phosphate pathway [4]. Thus, the accumulation of biomass and formation of solid tumors is central to the role of cancer cells. Indeed, it appears that abnormal metabolism may in itself drive cancer progression through a preference for enzymatic isoforms that favor anabolism [5]. For instance, pyruvate kinase type M2 and hexokinase 2, key enzymes in the glycolytic pathway of PDAC cells, contribute to the invasive potential and metastatic ability of the tumor [6, 7]. Dysregulated metabolism further manifests itself in several ways that contribute to a “cancer syndrome” in which systemic metabolism is deleteriously affected leading to specific cancer-induced muscle and adipose wasting, or cachexia [8]. The mechanisms leading to cachexia in PDAC are complex and varied, but dysregulated metabolism plays a role. Cachexia is a particularly burdensome facet of the disease and contributes greatly to mortality [9]. To similar deleterious effect, the use of glycolysis eliminates radical oxygen species that are generated during oxidative phosphorylation [10, 11]. This serves to preserve the genotype of viable tumor cells.

Glucose transporters (GLUTs), which belong to the solute carrier (SLC2A) family of transport proteins, are known to mediate glucose uptake by cells [12]. GLUTs are present in many tissues across the body and facilitate a number of roles. GLUT-1 has been most extensively studied in PDAC; it is thus the principal focus of this review. GLUT-1 is expressed in tissues with high glucose demand that principally undergo glycolysis. This includes normal cells that display the Warburg effect, such as hematopoietic stem cells [13, 14]. GLUT-1 thereby mitigates the first rate-limiting step in metabolism which is the transmembrane transport of glucose [15]. While GLUT-1 is responsible for basal glucose uptake in high-requirement cells, it plays additional roles central to both tumorigenesis and hypoxia [16]. GLUT-1 provides much needed substrate to tumor cells that express the Warburg phenotype in the presence of oxygen. GLUT-1 likewise provides glucose for cells to perform anaerobic glycolysis in hypoxic environments. Such is the case in PDAC: tumors are characterized by both acidity and hypoxia and, in distinct portions, hyperperfusion driven by neoangiogenesis [17].

3. Gene Expression in the Hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment

Solid tumors have the potential to thrive in otherwise hypoxic microenvironments by means of metabolism not seen in normal physiology. There are several factors that beneficially follow a localized hypoxia that protect the cell from stress and promote tumor growth, including the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). In PDAC, HIF-1alpha functions to upregulate proteins that are essential to survival in oxygen-deprived states [18]. HIF-1alpha has been extensively studied for many years and directly activates the transcription of GLUTs, enzymes essential to tumor cell glycolysis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other proteins essential to cellular proliferation [19]. Notably, an increased level of HIF-1alpha is specifically associated with increased expression of GLUT-1 that allows the aforementioned flux of glucose down its concentration gradient [20]. In addition to HIF-1alpha, increased expression of sirtuin 1, a lysine deacetylase with several enzymatic targets, has been implicated both in increased GLUT-1 expression and the glycolytic reprogramming of pancreatic tumor cells [21]. In a similar manner, GLUT-3 is upregulated by tumor cells under hypoxic stress [22]. The expression of GLUTs is also induced by the Ras and Src signaling pathways, both of which are canonical mechanisms of pancreatic oncogenesis [23]. There are two opposing explanations accounting for the high expression of GLUT-1 that illustrate its role in hypoxic and oncogenic pathways (or both combined due to secondary changes to the microenvironment): (1) glucose is used in excess via glycolytic pathways leading to intracellular depletion of glucose and the subsequent recruitment of facilitative transport enables a sustained high metabolic rate, and (2) the increased expression of GLUT-1 allows accelerated glycolysis by increasing intracellular glucose concentrations beyond normal physiological limits. Both mechanisms explain the high level of GLUT-1 found in response to upregulation and the Warburg effect in simplistic terms. In clear cell variants of PDAC, GLUT-1 is associated with cytoplasmic glycogen accumulation supporting the later hypothesis [24]. Clear cell features are however only observed in 24% of studied PDAC tumors [25]. GLUT-1 expression is also dependent on insulin levels, and the incidental insulin resistance frequently observed in PDAC may contribute to and propagate a glycolytic phenotype [26].

In either case, the ability of pancreatic tumors to overexpress glucose transporters corresponds to the other actions of transcription regulators in the hypoxic microenvironment that is the upregulation of glycolysis enzymes. Key checkpoint enzymes such as pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 and lactate dehydrogenase A are controlled when HIF-1alpha is silenced, confirming that HIF-1alpha mediates the transcription of numerous proteins in addition to GLUT-1 [27]. Additionally, when HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha are suppressed, there is a decrease in glucose utilization and lower lactic acid production [28]. This corresponds to an attenuation of glycolysis. Furthermore, it has been noted that suppression of HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha directly inhibits tumor growth, invasion ability, and migration of pancreatic cancer cells [27, 28]. HIF-2alpha, which has not been as thoroughly investigated as HIF-1alpha, has been found to interact with beta-catenin and form a particularly stable conformation that specifically promotes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell qualities of certain tumor cells via the Wnt signaling pathway [29]. As these factors induced by hypoxia contribute profoundly to the invasiveness of cancer, their role as prognostic markers has likewise been considered (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Several signaling pathways lead to the expression of GLUT-1 in PDAC cells. These include canonical Ras and Src pathways in addition to the adaptive response to a hypoxic microenvironment. Other factors associated with GLUT-1 expression are represented that characterize the aberrant physiology of tumor cells.

4. Histological Markers of Hypoxia

Increased expression of HIF-1alpha and sirtuin 1 is associated with poorer overall survival in PDAC [20, 24]. Both result in increased GLUT-1. Mechanistically, forced overexpression of GLUT-1 as a result of hypoxia-mediated transcription increases the activity of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) which hastens the development of invasive PDAC [30]. HIFs also lead to downregulation of tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (TrpRS) which has been studied in both colorectal and pancreatic cancers for its significance in prognosis [31]. TrpRS is downregulated in hypoxia and may function in the development of tumors with high metastatic ability. In addition to increasing GLUT-1 levels, sirtuin 1 is associated with the loss of cell cycle and apoptosis regulator 2 (CCAR2) which accordingly stimulates unchecked growth and proliferation [21].

In spite of these findings, there is significant controversy in recent literature surrounding the prognostic relationship between GLUT-1 and PDAC. Most sources suggest that high GLUT-1 expression on immunohistochemical assays of resected tumors corresponds to a tumor size greater than 2cm (T2 and greater), nodal involvement (N1), and shorter overall patient survival [32]. Profound GLUT-1 increases have also been correlated positively to histological grade in many cancers of the biliary system, including cancers of the gallbladder, bile duct, and ampulla of Vater [24, 33]. Cellular proliferation, as measured by Ki-67, is also related positively to GLUT-1 expression [34]. However, others find correlations only between GLUT-1 and poor overall survival [35]. Nevertheless, there is concord that both GLUT-1 and GLUT-3 may serve as a prognostic marker [36]. The literature is similarly divided with regard to 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT); some findings correlate increased maximal standardized uptake value to GLUT-1 expression [34, 35, 37, 38]. The lack of validated proportionality is surprising given the nature of FDG uptake in PET/CT evaluation [39]. Other families of glucose transporters, such as the sodium-dependent glucose transporters (SGLTs) have also been studied in tumors using immunohistochemical mapping [40]. Notably, SGLT-2 is expressed in PDAC cells; this has immediate implication due to the possible use of SGLT inhibitors in preventing further cellular glucose uptake.

5. Lactate Transport and Tumor Stroma

In the absence of oxidative phosphorylation, it follows that glycolytic cancer cells with metabolism driven by the facilitated transport of glucose would necessitate a corresponding facilitated release of glycolysis’ end product, lactic acid. One mechanism couples proton and lactate efflux via monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) [41]. The MCT family plays a significant role in many body tissues, including red blood cells, T-lymphocytes, white muscle, and tumor cells; all tissues that typically undergo glycolysis in aerobic conditions [42]. In particular, MCT-1, the most ubiquitous of the MCT isoforms across all tissue types, assists in restoring the pH of cells undergoing glycolysis through proton efflux [43]. The expression of MCT-1 parallels that of GLUT-1 with regard to tissue localization. The coordination of MCTs is furthermore useful in tumorigenesis, as the more glycolysis-driven centers of solid tumors can with transport rapidly provide the periphery—which has been superiorly perfused via neoangiogenesis secondary to VEGF expression in hypoxia—with substrate (lactate) for complete oxidation via electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation [44]. Studies have specifically associated MCT-4 to pancreatic cancer cell migration, and MCT-1 and MCT-4 have been linked to invasion ability [45]. Recently CD147—also known as basigin—has been identified as a regulator of several transporter proteins, including the MCT-1 and MCT-4, and that CD147 expression is mediated by the synthesis of matrix metalloproteins in tumor-associated fibroblasts [46, 47]. Indeed, tumorigenicity is inhibited in vivo when CD147 expression is silenced through RNA interference by increasing the intracellular concentration of lactate through inhibition of MCT-1 and MCT-4 expression in cells bearing a Warburg phenotype [48]. Of further note, CD147 has also been associated with glutamine transport and calcium signaling, and thus may serve as an ideal therapeutic target due to its role in multiple metabolic pathways [46, 47].

When studied via gap junctions, lactate is more rapidly discharged from cancer cells than protons, which are highly-buffered by a variety of intracellular bases [41]. Extracellular lactate thus was found to produce an alkalinized rim directly surrounding the pericellular space. This microenvironment at this rim of tumor cells further favors tumor growth, particularly when the intermediates of aerobic glycolysis provide the building blocks of tumor biomass [10, 41]. Connexin43 (Cx43), a component of competent gap junctions in the pancreas, has been identified as an important conduit for lactate, stabilizing and functioning as a component of intercellular gap junctions [41]. By serving as a channel, Cx43 facilitates the alkalization of proliferating tumor cells in an otherwise acidic environment. Lactate is sequestered away from hypoxic microscopic foci in the developing tumor to better perfused recipient cells where it may serve as a substrate for oxidative phosphorylation; this schema of metabolite sequestration parallels the actions of MCT-1 and MCT-4 described previously. The utilization of lactate as substrate for further oxidation is a third benefit of the Warburg effect [10]. These actions of Cx43 allow for the dynamic interplay between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation that enables pancreatic cancer cells to thrive [49].

Besides serving as a channel for lactate dissipation, Cx43 mediates cellular communication between cancer and tumor-associated stromal cells. For example, pancreatic stellate cells express Cx43 and type 1 collagen in proliferation [50]. The dysregulation of Cx43 is also well known to parallel the progression of pancreatic cancer. In pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), Cx43 is localized to the basolateral membrane of pancreatic duct cells [51]. As tumorigenesis progresses, Cx43 becomes more associated with the surrounding stroma. Cx43 normally exists in different states of phosphorylation [52]. These phosphoisoforms are believed to reflect the localization of Cx43, patency of the gap junction, and ability to participate in epithelial-stromal communication [51]. Extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) modulates Cx43 localization and contributes to malignancy in response to growth factor stimulation [53]. To further characterize the relationship, ERK and various epidermal growth factors are expressed at increased levels in PanINs [54]. In contrast to these findings, advanced pancreatic tumors and cancer stem cells typically do not express Cx43, and gap junction function is interrupted [55]. These changes in the competency of gap junctions has been implicated in therapy, both in regard to novel approaches and in consideration of mechanisms underlying the resistance to conventional chemotherapy.

6. Conclusion

Transporters play a facilitative role in the metabolism that characterizes PDAC tumor cells. There is much evidence that the overexpression of glucose transporters and glycolytic enzymes positively influence tumor growth and increase mortality. The alterations in glucose handling by tumor cells may represent a systemic cancer syndrome that contributes to the profound symptoms of aggressive tumors such as found in PDAC. Of note, the discharge and localization of lactic acid are necessary for tumorigenesis by creating an ideal tumor microenvironment. There are multiple transporters involved in the reprogrammed metabolism PDAC, including GLUT-1, MCT-1 and -4, CD147, and Cx43; all may serve as potential therapeutic targets, particularly when combined with standard therapies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures 2018, American Cancer Society, Atlanta GA, USA, 2018.
  2. O. Warburg, F. Wind, and E. Negelein, “The metabolism of tumors in the body,” The Journal of General Physiology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 519–530, 1927. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646–674, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. A. Newsholme and M. Board, “Application of metabolic-control logic to fuel utilization and its significance in tumor cells,” Advances in Enzyme Regulation, vol. 31, no. C, pp. 225–246, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. S. Ward and C. B. Thompson, “Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even warburg did not anticipate,” Cancer Cell, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 297–308, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Li, Z. Zhao, Z. Zhou, and R. Liu, “PKM2 Promotes Cell Survival and Invasion Under Metabolic Stress by Enhancing Warburg Effect in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 767–773, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Anderson, R. Marayati, R. Moffitt, and J. J. Yeh, “Hexokinase 2 promotes tumor growth and metastasis by regulating lactate production in pancreatic cancer,” Oncotarget , vol. 8, no. 34, pp. 56081–56094, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. E. Porporato, “Understanding cachexia as a cancer metabolism syndrome,” Oncogenesis, vol. 5, no. 2, article no. e200, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. J. Wigmore, C. E. Plester, R. A. Richardson, and K. C. H. Fearon, “Changes in nutritional status associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 106–109, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. C. Ngo, K. Ververis, S. M. Tortorella, and T. C. Karagiannis, “Introduction to the molecular basis of cancer metabolism and the Warburg effect,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 819–823, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Yokoyama, N. Tanuma, R. Shibuya et al., “Pyruvate kinase type M2 contributes to the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by regulating the production of metabolites and reactive oxygen species,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 881–891, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. L. Macheda, S. Rogers, and J. D. Best, “Molecular and cellular regulation of glucose transporter (GLUT) proteins in cancer,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 654–662, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. M. Abdel-Haleem, N. E. Lewis, N. Jamshidi et al., “The emerging facets of non-cancerous warburg effect,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 8, article 279, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Oburoglu, S. Tardito, V. Fritz et al., “Glucose and glutamine metabolism regulate human hematopoietic stem cell lineage specification,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 169–184, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Hatanaka, “Transport of sugars in tumor cell membranes,” BBA - Reviews on Cancer, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 77–104, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Fukumoto, S. Seino, H. Imura, Y. Seino, and G. I. Bell, “Characterization and expression of human HepG2/erythrocyte glucose-transporter gene,” Diabetes, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 657–661, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Kato, S. Ozawa, C. Miyamoto et al., “Acidic extracellular microenvironment and cancer,” Cancer Cell International, vol. 13, no. 1, article 89, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. L. Talks, H. Turley, K. C. Gatter et al., “The expression and distribution of the hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α in normal human tissues, cancers, and tumor-associated macrophages,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 411–421, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Zhong, A. M. De Marzo, E. Laughner et al., “Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha in common human cancers and their metastases,” Cancer Research, vol. 59, no. 22, pp. 5830–5835, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Sun, Z. Qiu, J. Liu et al., “Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha and associated proteins in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their impact on prognosis,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1359–1367, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. V. Pinho, A. Mawson, A. Gill et al., “Sirtuin1 stimulates the proliferation and the expression of glycolysis genes in pancreatic neoplastic lesions,” Oncotarget , vol. 7, no. 46, pp. 74768–74778, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Natsuizaka, M. Ozasa, S. Darmanin et al., “Synergistic up-regulation of Hexokinase-2, glucose transporters and angiogenic factors in pancreatic cancer cells by glucose deprivation and hypoxia,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 313, no. 15, pp. 3337–3348, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. Murakami, T. Nishiyama, T. Shirotani et al., “Identification of two enhancer elements in the gene encoding the type 1 glucose transporter from the mouse with are responsive to serum, growth factor, and oncogenes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 13, pp. 9300–9306, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  24. O. Basturk, R. Singh, E. Kaygusuz et al., “GLUT-1 expression in pancreatic neoplasia: Implications in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis,” Pancreas, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Kim, J. Liao, M. Zhang et al., “Clear cell carcinoma of the pancreas: histopathologic features and a unique biomarker: hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β,” Modern Pathology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1075–1083, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. X.-Z. Ding, D. M. Fehsenfeld, L. O. Murphy, J. Permert, and T. E. Adrian, “Physiological concentrations of insulin augment pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and glucose utilization by activating MAP kinase, PI3 kinase and enhancing GLUT-1 expression,” Pancreas, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 310–320, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y. Jiang, G. Wu, G. He et al., “The effects of silencing HIF-1alpha in BxPC-3 cell line on glycolysis-related gene expression, cell growth, invasion, and apoptosis,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1314–1323, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  28. X. G. Cui, Z. T. Han, S. H. He et al., “HIF1/2alpha mediates hypoxia-induced LDHA expression in human pancreatic cancer cells,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 24840–24852, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  29. Q. Zhang, Y. Lou, and J. Zhang, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha promotes tumor progression and has crosstalk with Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in pancreatic cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 119, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. H. Ito, M. Duxbury, M. J. Zinner, S. W. Ashley, and E. E. Whang, “Glucose transporter-1 gene expression is associated with pancreatic cancer invasiveness and MMP-2 activity,” Surgery, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 548–556, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. E. L. Paley, D. E. Paley, T. Merkulova-Rainon, and P. R. Subbarayan, “Hypoxia signature of splice forms of tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase marks pancreatic cancer cells with distinct metastatic abilities,” Pancreas, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1043–1056, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Sharen, Y. Peng, H. Cheng, Y. Liu, Y. Shi, and J. Zhao, “Prognostic value of GLUT-1 expression in pancreatic cancer: Results from 538 patients,” Oncotarget , vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 19760–19767, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Y. Sung, G. Y. Kim, and S. J. Lim, “Expression of GLUT1 glucose transporter and p53 in carcinomas of the pancreatobiliary tract,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  34. K. Lu, J. Yang, D. C. Li et al., “Expression and clinical significance of glucose transporter-1 in pancreatic cancer,” Oncology Letters, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 243–249, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. A. H. Davis-Yadley, A. M. Abbott, J. M. Pimiento, D.-T. Chen, and M. P. Malafa, “Increased expression of the glucose transporter type 1 gene is associated with worse overall survival in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma,” Pancreas, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 974–979, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. X. Chen, P. Lu, S. Zhou, L. Zhang, J.-H. Zhao, and J.-H. Tang, “Predictive value of glucose transporter-1 and glucose transporter-3 for survival of cancer patients: A meta-analysis,” Oncotarget , vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 13206–13213, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Chikamoto, R. Inoue, Y. Komohara et al., “Preoperative high maximum standardized uptake value in association with glucose transporter 1 predicts poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2040–2046, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H.-J. Yang, W.-J. Xu, Y.-H. Guan et al., “Expression of Glut-1 and HK-II in pancreatic cancer and their impact on prognosis and FDG accumulation,” Translational Oncology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 583–591, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. Zhuang and A. Alavi, “18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in the detection and monitoring of infection and inflammation,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 47–59, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. C. Scafoglio, B. A. Hirayama, V. Kepe et al., “Functional expression of sodium-glucose transporters in cancer,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 30, pp. E4111–E4119, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. T. H. Dovmark, M. Saccomano, A. Hulikova, F. Alves, and P. Swietach, “Connexin-43 channels are a pathway for discharging lactate from glycolytic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells,” Oncogene, vol. 36, no. 32, pp. 4538–4550, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. P. Halestrap and M. C. Wilson, “The monocarboxylate transporter family—role and regulation,” IUBMB Life, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 109–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. P. Halestrap, X. Wang, R. C. Poole, V. N. Jackson, and N. T. Price, “Lactate transport in heart in relation to myocardial ischemia,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 17–25, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. P. Sonveaux, F. Végran, T. Schroeder et al., “Targeting lactate-fueled respiration selectively kills hypoxic tumor cells in mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 118, no. 12, pp. 3930–3942, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. C. Kong, A. Nøhr-Nielsen, K. Zeeberg et al., “Monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT4 regulate migration and invasion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells,” Pancreas, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1036–1047, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. A. Kendrick, J. Schafer, M. Dzieciatkowska et al., “CD147: A small molecule transporter ancillary protein at the crossroad of multiple hallmarks of cancer and metabolic reprogramming,” Oncotarget , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 6742–6762, 2017. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. I. Marchiq, J. Albrengues, S. Granja, C. Gaggioli, J. Pouysségur, and M.-P. Simon, “Knock out of the BASIGIN/CD147 chaperone of lactate/H+ symporters disproves its pro-tumour action via extracellular matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) induction,” Oncotarget , vol. 6, no. 28, pp. 24636–24648, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. W. Schneiderhan, M. Scheler, K.-H. Holzmann et al., “CD147 silencing inhibits lactate transport and reduces malignant potential of pancreatic cancer cells in in vivo and in vitro models,” Gut, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1391–1398, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. S. Granja, C. Pinheiro, R. M. Reis, O. Martinho, and F. Baltazar, “Glucose addiction in cancer therapy: Advances and drawbacks,” Current Drug Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 221–242, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Masamune, N. Suzuki, K. Kikuta et al., “Connexins regulate cell functions in pancreatic stellate cells,” Pancreas, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 308–316, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. L. Solan, S. R. Hingorani, and P. D. Lampe, “Changes in connexin43 expression and localization during pancreatic cancer progression,” Journal of Membrane Biology, vol. 245, no. 5-6, pp. 255–262, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. L. S. Musil, E. C. Beyer, and D. A. Goodenough, “Expression of the gap junction protein connexin43 in embryonic chick lens: Molecular cloning, ultrastructural localization, and post-translational phosphorylation,” Journal of Membrane Biology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 163–175, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Y. Kanemitsu and A. F. Lau, “Epidermal growth factor stimulates the disruption of gap junctional communication and connexin43 phosphorylation independent of 12-0- tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate-sensitive protein kinase C: The possible involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase,” Molecular Biology of the Cell (MBoC), vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 837–848, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. R. Hingorani, L. Wang, A. S. Multani et al., “Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice,” Cancer Cell, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 469–483, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. T. Forster, V. Rausch, Y. Zhang et al., “Sulforaphane counteracts aggressiveness of pancreatic cancer driven by dysregulated Cx43-mediated gap junctional intercellular communication,” Oncotarget , vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1621–1634, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus