Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Oncology
Volume 2019, Article ID 2585748, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2585748
Research Article

Local Anesthesia for Port Catheter Placement in Oncology Patients: An Alternative to Landmark Technique Using Ultrasound-Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block—A Prospective Randomized Study

Health Sciences University, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinic, Diyarbakir, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Hakan Akelma; rt.ude.ubs@amleka.nakah

Received 21 April 2019; Accepted 10 July 2019; Published 31 July 2019

Academic Editor: Ozkan Kanat

Copyright © 2019 Hakan Akelma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Lorch, M. Zwaan, C. Kagel, and H. Weiss, “Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 180–184, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. B. Gross, “American society of anesthesiologists task force on perioperative blood management: practice guidelines for perioperative blood management: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on perioperative blood management,” Anesthesiology, vol. 122, pp. 241–275, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Dolu, S. Goksu, L. Sahin, O. Ozen, and L. Eken, “Comparison of an ultrasound-guided technique versus a landmark-guided technique for internal jugular vein cannulation,” Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 177–182, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. G. S. Patel, K. Jain, R. Kumar et al., “Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies,” Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 121–128, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Torgay, A. Pirat, S. Candan, P. Zeyneloglu, G. Arslan, and M. Haberal, “Internal jugular versus subclavian vein catheterization for central venous catheterization in orthotopic liver transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 3171–3173, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. P. Bannon, S. F. Heller, and M. Rivera, “Anatomic considerations for central venous cannulation,” Risk Manag Healthc Policy, vol. 4, pp. 27–39, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. I. Seldinger, “Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 368–376, 1953. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Farrell and M. Gellens, “Ultrasound-guided cannulation verus the landmark-guided technique for acute haemodialysis access,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation , vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1234–1237, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. L. Tan and M. Gibson, “Central venous catheters: the role of radiology,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 61, pp. 13–22, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access, S. M. Rupp, J. L. Apfelbaum et al., “Practice guidelines for central venous access: A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access,” Anesthesiology, vol. 116, pp. 539–573, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Yip and B. Funaki, “Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 371–375, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Chung and M. V. Beheshti, “Principles of non-tunneled central venous access,” Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 186–191, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. S. J. Gonda and R. Li, “Principles of subcutaneous port placement,” Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 198–203, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Miccini, D. Cassini, M. Gregori, S. Gazzanelli, S. Cassibba, and D. Biacchi, “Ultrasound-guided placement of central venous port systems via the right internal jugular vein: are chest x-ray and/or fluoroscopy needed to confirm the correct placement of the device?” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2353–2358, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. A. Yilmazlar, H. Bilgin, G. Korfali, A. Eren, and U. Özkan, “Complications of 1303 central venous cannulations,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 319–321, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. H. Matsushima, T. Adachi, T. Iwata et al., “Analysis of the outcomes in central venous access port implantation performed by residents via the internal jugular vein and subclavian vein,” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 443–449, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. V. Etezadi and S. O. Trerotola, “Comparison of inversion (“flipping”) rates among different port designs: a single-center experience,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 553–559, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. D. Tobias, “Cervical plexus block in adolescents,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 606–608, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. T. Çiftci, H. Daskaya, M. B. Yıldırım, and H. Söylemez, “A minimally painful, comfortable, and safe technique for hemodialysis catheter placement in children: Superficial cervical plexus block,” Hemodialysis International, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 700–704, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. B. Ho and M. De Paoli, “Use of ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block for pain management in the emergency department,” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. E. Granziera, M. Scarpa, A. Ciccarese et al., “Totally implantable venous access devices: retrospective analysis of different insertion techniques and predictors of complications in 796 devices implanted in a single institution,” BMC Surgery, vol. 14, article 27, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Ruesch, B. Walder, and M. R. Tramèr, “Complications of central venous catheters: Internal jugular versus subclavian access - a systematic review,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 454–460, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. L. Skolnick, “The role of sonography in the placement and management of jugular and subclavian central venous catheters.,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 291–295, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Bruzoni, B. J. Slater, J. Wall, S. D. St Peter, and S. Dutta, “A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound- vs landmark-guided central venous access in the pediatric population,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 216, no. 5, pp. 939–943, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. P. Tagliari, F. L. Staub, J. R. Guimarães, A. Migliavacca, and D. d. Mossmann, “Evaluation of three different techniques for insertion of totally implantable venous access device: A randomized clinical trial,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 56–59, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. A. Canfora, C. Mauriello, A. Ferronetti et al., “Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided placement of central venous port systems via the right internal jugular vein in elderly oncologic patients: our single-center experience and protocol,” Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 29, no. S1, pp. 127–130, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. T. Seo, M. G. Song, J. S. Kim et al., “Long-term clinical outcomes of the single-incision technique for implantation of implantable venous access ports via the axillary vein,” The Journal of Vascular Access, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 345–351, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Vardy, K. Engelhardt, K. Cox et al., “Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 1045–1049, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. W. Schummer, C. Schummer, N. Rose, W.-D. Niesen, and S. G. Sakka, “Mechanical complications and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experienced operators: a prospective study of 1794 catheterizations in critically ill patients,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1055–1059, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus