Research Article

Can We Increase the Resection Rate by Minimally Invasive Approach? Experience from 100 Minimally Invasive Esophagectomies

Table 2

Postoperative outcomes.

Fit for any approach  
n=90
Fit for MIE only  
n=10
P value

Lymph nodes examined, median (IQR)21 (17-28)22 (9-28)0.505

Pos. resection margins, n (%)1 (1.1)00.738

Complications, n (%)

 Any type38 (42.2)7 (70.0)0.094

 Minor (CDC Grades I-II)32 (35.6)2 (20.0)0.325

 Major (CDC Grades IIIa-V)6 (6.7)5 (50.0)<0.001

 Anastomotic leak4 (10)2 (20)0.049

 Pulmonary event19 (21.1)4 (40)0.178

 Cardiac event12 (12)1 (10)0.766

Change in level of care, n (%)03 (30.0)<0.001

ICU stay, median (IQR)1 (1-1)1 (1-3)0.196

Hospital stay, median (IQR)9 (9-12)10 (8-16)0.542

Readmission rate within 30 days of discharge, n (%)4 (4.4)3 (30.0)0.003

Comprehensive Complication Index, median (IQR)

 30-day0 (0-20.9)20.9 (0-92.2)0.032

 90-day0 (0-20.9)20.9 (0-92.7)0.038

Mortality, n (%)

 30-day01 (10.0)0.003

 90-day02 (20.0)<0.001