Research Article

Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Table 2

Pretreatment and treatment characteristics for propensity score-matched patients per elective nodal irradiation status.

CovariateAll patients (N = 646)ENI (N = 323)IFRT (N = 323) value

Median age, y (range)63 (31–79)63 (31–79)64 (34–78)0.92

Age group, y (%)
 ≤70 years586 (90.7)294 (91.0)292 (90.4)0.86
 70 years60 (9.3)29 (9.0)31 (9.6)

Gender (%)
 Male400 (61.9)201 (62.2)199 (61.6)0.81
 Female246 (38.1)122 (37.8)124 (38.4)

KPS (%)
 90–100461 (71.4)232 (71.8)229 (70.9)0.74
 70–80185 (28.6)91 (28.2)94 (29.1)

Histology (%)
 AC348 (53.9)177 (54.8)171 (52.9)0.62
 SCC298 (46.1)146 (45.2)152 (47.1)

T-stage
 1-2289 (44.8)143 (44.3)146 (45.2)0.43
 3-4357 (55.2)180 (55.7)177 (54.8)

N-stage
 2325 (50.3)164 (50.8)161 (49.8)0.79
 3321 (49.7)159 (49.2)162 (50.2)

Disease stage (%)
 IIIB385 (59.6)195 (60.4)190 (58.8)0.57
 IIIC261 (40.4)128 (39.6)133 (41.2)

Chemotherapy cycles (%)
 2-3529 (81.9)263 (81.4)266 (82.3)0.71
 1117 (18.1)60 (18.6)57 (17.7)

Radiotherapy technique (%)
 3D-CRT248 (38.4)127 (39.3)121 (37.5)0.69
 IMRT398 (61.6)196 (60.7)202 (62.5)

ENI: elective nodal irradiation; IFRT: involved-field radiotherapy; KPS: Karnofsky performance score; AC: adenocarcinoma; SCC: squamous cell cancer; T: tumor; N: node; 3D-CRT: 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; IMRT: intensity-modulated radiotherapy.