Research Article
PrACTiC: A Predictive Algorithm for Chemoradiotherapy-Induced Cytopenia in Glioblastoma Patients
Table 1
The true positive of each class and accuracy of thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and lymphopenia predicted by different machine learning models.
| Toxicity type | Misclassification cost | Model | TP-class 1 | TP-class 0 | Accuracy | AUC |
| Thrombocytopenia | 10 | RUS boosted | 75 | 85 | 85.6 | 0.88 | 11 | 92 | 73 | 74.8 | 0.87 | 12 | 85 | 73 | 73.9 | 0.84 | Lymphopenia | 4 | Naïve bayes | 78 | 79 | 78.9 | 0.83 | | RUS boosted | 71 | 84 | 81.7 | 0.80 | | Naïve bayes | 75 | 79 | 78.2 | 0.83 | 5 | Linear discriminant | 71 | 70 | 70.4 | 0.75 | | Naïve bayes | 75 | 76 | 76.1 | 0.83 | 6 | Boosted tree | 71 | 92 | 88.7 | 0.86 | | RUS boosted | 71 | 81 | 79.6 | 0.81 | Neutropenia | 9 | RUS boosted | 89 | 88 | 88 | 0.94 | 10 | RUS boosted | 89 | 89 | 89.3 | 0.92 | 11 | RUS boosted | 89 | 88 | 88 | 0.96 |
|
|
Bold values show the highest accuracy of toxicity prediction.
|