Erratum to “Associations of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Fatness with Metabolic Syndrome in Rural Women with Prehypertension”

Table 3

Logistic regressions predicting metabolic syndrome by unfit/fat and fit/fat categories using two body composition methods.

	Cases	b	OR	95% CI	P
	Model 1—fit/fat categories defining obesity by percent body fat
Unfit/fat	78/188 (41.5%)		1
Fit/fat	12/85 (14.1%)	−1.64	0.19	0.09–0.41	<0.001
	Model 2—fit/fat categories defining obesity by revised BMI cut-score
Unfit/fat	78/179 (43.6%)		1
Fit/fat	12/57 (21.1%)	−1.17	0.31	0.14–0.69	0.004

“Fat” was defined as body fat cut-score ≥30% and as ≥25 kg/m² for revised BMI obesity cut-score.
“Fit” was >25 mL/kg/min. Both models were adjusted for age, education, and household income.
Both models excluded women classified as “not-fat” as there were no cases of metabolic syndrome in women classified as “non-fat.”
Nagelkerke R square was 0.13 and 0.07 for models 1 and 2, respectively.