Strength Training Reduces Fat Accumulation and Improves Blood Lipid Profile Even in the Absence of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Condition
Table 2
Adiposity, comorbidities, and hormonal parameters.
Groups
CS
ObS
CT
ObT
Initial body weight (g)
447.13 ± 34.12
555.13 ± 35.10a
465.37 ± 35.97
549.39 ± 39.50d
Final body weight (g)†
477.97 ± 36.76
654.31 ± 50.34a
471.85 ± 44.94
590.33 ± 46.65c,d
Body weight gain (g)
30.84 ± 22.80
99.19 ± 21.37a
6.48 ± 18.04b
40.94 ± 27.08c,d
Body fat (g)†
27.75 ± 5.01
68.2 ± 13.50a
27.30 ± 2.10
52.78 ± 12.66c,d
Adiposity index (%)
5.79 ± 0.86
10.35 ± 1.46a
5.83 ± 0.73
8.87 ± 1.71c,d
Leptin (ng/mL)
5.57 ± 2.98
20.48 ± 4.35a
4.77 ± 2.36
13.24 ± 7.23c,d
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
66.45 ± 9.10
55.86 ± 13.18a
64.05 ± 9.68
55.00 ± 8.39
HDL (mg/dL)
23.30 ± 3.05
22.86 ± 6.30
24.70 ± 3.16
24.06 ± 3.87
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
22.05 ± 5.99
30.36 ± 6.90a
19.60 ± 3.09
23.06 ± 9.50c
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. CS = sedentary control (n = 10); CT = control submitted to the strength training protocol (n = 10); ObS = sedentary obese (n = 7); ObT = obesity submitted to strength training protocol (n = 9); † = data presented in median ± interquartile range. Number of animals submitted to leptin analysis: CS (n = 9); CT (n = 9); ObS (n = 7); ObT (n = 8). :aObS vs. CT; bCT vs. CS; cObT vs. ObS; dObT vs. CT.