Research Article

Strength Training Reduces Fat Accumulation and Improves Blood Lipid Profile Even in the Absence of Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Condition

Table 2

Adiposity, comorbidities, and hormonal parameters.

Groups
CSObSCTObT

Initial body weight (g)447.13 ± 34.12555.13 ± 35.10a465.37 ± 35.97549.39 ± 39.50d
Final body weight (g)477.97 ± 36.76654.31 ± 50.34a471.85 ± 44.94590.33 ± 46.65c,d
Body weight gain (g)30.84 ± 22.8099.19 ± 21.37a6.48 ± 18.04b40.94 ± 27.08c,d
Body fat (g)27.75 ± 5.0168.2 ± 13.50a27.30 ± 2.1052.78 ± 12.66c,d
Adiposity index (%)5.79 ± 0.8610.35 ± 1.46a5.83 ± 0.738.87 ± 1.71c,d
Leptin (ng/mL)5.57 ± 2.9820.48 ± 4.35a4.77 ± 2.3613.24 ± 7.23c,d
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)66.45 ± 9.1055.86 ± 13.18a64.05 ± 9.6855.00 ± 8.39
HDL (mg/dL)23.30 ± 3.0522.86 ± 6.3024.70 ± 3.1624.06 ± 3.87
Triglycerides (mg/dL)22.05 ± 5.9930.36 ± 6.90a19.60 ± 3.0923.06 ± 9.50c

Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation. CS = sedentary control (n = 10); CT = control submitted to the strength training protocol (n = 10); ObS = sedentary obese (n = 7); ObT = obesity submitted to strength training protocol (n = 9);  =  data presented in median ± interquartile range. Number of animals submitted to leptin analysis: CS (n = 9); CT (n = 9); ObS (n = 7); ObT (n = 8). : aObS vs. CT; bCT vs. CS; cObT vs. ObS; dObT vs. CT.