Clinical Study

Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results

Figure 6

Depths of average demarcation lines recorded one month after continuous light (blue bar) and pulsed light (orange bar) accelerated crosslinking evaluated by corneal OCT (left), Scheimpflug camera (middle), and in vivo confocal microscopy (right) showing a deeper penetration of pulsed light treatment (orange bars) by a mean value of 215 μm (±20 μm) versus a lower penetration of continuous light treatment (blue bars) by a mean value of 160 μm (±20 μm).
604731.fig.006