Visual Rehabilitation in Combined Surgical Procedures: Bridging Two Eye Poles for Better VisionView this Special Issue
Wide-Field Landers Temporary Keratoprosthesis in Severe Ocular Trauma: Functional and Anatomical Results after One Year
Purpose. To evaluate longitudinal functional and anatomical results after combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) using a wide-field Landers intraoperative temporary keratoprosthesis (TKP) in patients with vitreoretinal pathology and corneal opacity due to severe ocular trauma. Material and Methods. Medical records of 12 patients who had undergone PPV/PKP/KP due to severe eye trauma were analyzed. Functional (best-corrected visual acuity) and anatomic outcomes (clarity of the corneal graft, retinal attachment, and intraocular pressure) were assessed during the follow-up (mean 16 months). Results. Final visual acuities varied from NLP to CF to 2 m. Visual acuity improved in 7 cases, was unchanged in 4 eyes, and worsened in 1 eye. The corneal graft was transparent during the follow-up in 3 cases and graft failure was observed in 9 eyes. Silicone oil was used as a tamponade in all cases and retina was reattached in 92% of cases. Conclusions. Combined PPV and PKP with the use of wide-field Landers TKP allowed for surgical intervention in patients with vitreoretinal pathology coexisting with corneal wound. Although retina was attached in most of the cases, corneal graft survived only in one-fourth of patients and final visual acuities were poor.
Severe ocular trauma is usually associated with combined anterior and posterior segment damage and is a surgical challenge. Many eyes (about 50%) with perforating injuries have entrance wound in the cornea . Small and thin corneal scars make it possible to perform pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). However, the view of the retina and vitreous may be difficult due to massive corneal epithelium edema, scar formation, blood staining, or neovascularization of the cornea. Thus, it may be not easy to attach the retina, shave the vitreous body, or remove intraocular foreign body (IOFB) during PPV. Endoscopy-assisted PPV is one option in these cases ; however it requires specialized equipment and training (steep learning curve).
Development of temporary keratoprosthesis (TKP) allows performing elaborated surgery adequately in severely traumatized eyes requiring PPV with an opaque cornea.
Use of TKP during PPV was first described by Landers et al. in 1981 . The first TKP was biconcave optical cylinder 5 mm in length made of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and had 7.2 mm in diameter (Figure 1). In 1987 Eckardt  proposed a modification of TKP made of silicone and having a diameter of 10 mm of the outer cylinder and a diameter of 7 mm of the inner cylinder with 2.8 mm in length. However, Eckardt TKP became cloudy after reusing as there were no holes for sutures and the silicone became damaged after multiple suture trucks . Moreover, the view into the peripheral retina was limited. The modification is Landers third-generation wide-field TKP which is hard plastic PMMA device with a 1 mm cylinder protruding to the anterior chamber (choice of diameters: 6.2 mm, 7.2 mm, or 8.2 mm) with a mushroom-shape corneal surface of a diameter 15.5 mm and 6 suture holes in the periphery . Landers wide-field TKP is durable and reusable and can be sutured firmly to the globe; moreover it has a convex anterior surface to facilitate viewing to the posterior pole and periphery of the retina . The latest improvement is trunkless Landers wide-field TKP with no central trunk extending down into the opening in the cornea . Additionally, there are models including 20 G stainless steel infusion line . Thus, the major differences between three generations of TKPs are material (PMMA or silicone) and dimensions of the cylinder and the corneal surface to have a better view to the retina.
The aim of this study was to show functional and anatomical results after one year in patients after severe ocular trauma treated with combined surgery: PPV with wide-field Landers TKP and PKP.
This interventional case series included patients, who had combined PPV and TKP and PKP surgery performed between March 2009 and December 2011 in the Department of General Ophthalmology of Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients gave their written informed consent. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) severe open eye injury with corneal or corneoscleral laceration, (2) retinal detachment, (3) combined PPV/TKP/PKP surgery, and (4) follow-up of at least 10 months. In all cases corneal wound (Figure 2) was sutured during the first operation (Figure 3) as an emergency procedure; TKP/PKP/TPPV was performed as a second surgery, few days later (mean period of 24 days).
The patient data were recorded including age, gender, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and history of ocular injuries. Ocular trauma data included the mechanism and type of injury classified according to the Ocular Trauma Classification [7, 8]. All included eyes underwent open-globe injury (injury with full thickness wound to the cornea or/and sclera), penetrating, IOFB, or eye rupture. The site of the injury was classified as zones I, II, and III depending on the location of the wound within the cornea or sclera. Zone I injuries are confined strictly to the cornea, zone II injuries involve the anterior sclera of 5 mm from the limbus, and zone III injuries involved full thickness scleral defects more posterior than 5 mm from the limbus [7, 8].
As initial and final visual acuities were poor and not measured using Snellen charts, hand motion (HM), finger counting (FC), light perception (LP), and no light perception (NLP) forms were used to describe visual acuities of included patients. The preoperative examination included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and B-scan ultrasonography (Figure 4). The follow-up examination included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, corneal graft transparency, and retinal attachment.
The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range 10–29 months). The schedule of control examinations after surgery was planned as follows: next day, one week, one month, three months, six months, one year, one and half of a year and two years after operation.
Functional (best-corrected visual acuity: improved, stable, and worsened) and anatomic outcomes (clarity of the corneal graft, retinal attachment, and intraocular pressure) were assessed during the follow-up.
3. Surgical Technique
All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia by two surgeons, anterior segment surgeon and vitreoretinal surgeon. Mean operation time was 3 hours (range 2–4 hours).
Anterior chamber maintainer was first put into anterior chamber. Next, corneal trephination was performed (Figure 5) using handheld trephine and microcorneal scissors (diameter of the corneal button 7.5 mm). The traumatic cataract was then removed with phacoemulsification and next a scleral fixation of artificial intraocular lens was performed. The Landers wide-field TKP (Ocular Instruments, Bellevue, WA) with 1 mm trunk was then placed into the corneal bed and sutured to the limbus using Vicryl 8.0 sutures (Figure 6). Infusion cannula was put to the vitreous cavity and visualized. Additional sclerotomies for the cutter and light pipe were done around the TKP to perform 23-gauge (G) PPV (Constellation, Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas) including posterior vitreous detachment and shaving of the vitreous base. After dying with indocyanine green, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was done (Figure 7). Perfluorocarbon liquids were used to attach the retina. At the end of the operation TKP was removed and the donor cornea button (diameter 7.75 mm) was sutured in place using Nylon 10.0 full thickness sutures after removal of the TKP. Next, fluid-air and air-silicone oil (5 000 cSt) exchange was done. The sclerotomies were closed with Vicryl 7.0 sutures.
The inclusion criteria were met by 12 patients (Table 1). The mean age of included patients was 42 years (range 21–71 years); there were 10 males and 2 females. As a mechanism of trauma (Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology (BETT) scale) there were 7 lacerations, IOFB was present in four cases, and there was one eye rupture. Wound location was classified according to Ocular Trauma Classification Group as zone I in 5 eyes, as zone II in 5 eyes, and as zone III in 2 eyes. Visual acuities at presentation were as follows: 4 NLP eyes, 2 light perception eyes, HM in 5 eyes, and CF in 1 eye. There was an improvement of the visual acuity in 7 eyes (59%), no change in 4 (33%) eyes, and worsening in 1 case (8%). There were three NLP eyes that did not improve in the visual acuity. One revealed hypotony, one phthisis bulbi. Final visual acuities were as follows: 4 NLP eyes, 1 HM eye, and 7 CF eyes, the best CF to 2 m (case 3).
The corneal graft was transparent during the follow-up in 3 cases (25%) (Figure 8). Graft failure was observed in 9 eyes (75%) (Figure 9). Ahmed valve was implanted in two eyes due to uncontrolled glaucoma, cases 2 and 10. Overall, phthisis bulbi evolved in 2 cases (16%), cases 4 and 6; hypotony evolved in another 2 cases (16%), cases 3 and 11. Silicone oil was used as a tamponade in all cases; retina was reattached in 92% of cases. No eye was enucleated; no eye revealed signs of sympathetic ophthalmia. All eyes were silicon-oil sustained.
Wide-field Landers TKP is a useful intraoperative tool to visualize the posterior segment even in case of large posttraumatic corneal wounds. By performing combined PPV/TKP/PKP procedure many maneuvers are possible during PPV: ILM peeling, vitreous shaving, and fluid-air and air-silicone-oil exchange, using perfluorocarbon liquids. Landers wide-field TKP is not leaking during indenting and is reusable.
Nevertheless, both functional and anatomical outcomes of our case series of 12 patients were not favorable probably because of severity of the initial trauma. However, the natural course of the disease would be much more worse resulting in phthisis bulbi in most of the cases.
The reason for these unsatisfactory results in our case series was mostly corneal graft failure (75%) or hypotony due to ciliary body dysfunction (16%) or glaucoma (16%).
All eyes in our study were silicone-oil sustained and it is known that silicone oil may stress the donor endothelium and may result in decompensation of the graft [9, 10]. Moreover, in eyes with long-term silicone oil tamponade, silicon oil may be present in the anterior chamber causing keratopathy by direct contact with corneal endothelium .
In other case series the percentage of eyes with clear corneas after longitudinal follow-up following combined PPV/TKP/PKP ranged from 15%  to 75% . It has been already shown that the risk of corneal graft failure is increased if PKP is performed during the first 2 months after ocular trauma . In our series the mean time from injury to PPV/TKP/PKP was 24 days. On the other side it is recommended to perform PPV after severe ocular trauma and retinal detachment in the first two weeks [13, 14]. Dong and colleagues  suggest performing this combined surgery within 1 month from injury. They reported results of 78 eyes operated with Landers keratoprosthesis after 24 months of observation. Unsatisfactory postoperative visual acuity in their study was due to graft failure, recurrent PVR, or secondary glaucoma.
In the literature, the final retinal reattachment varied from 43%  to 91% . In our case series reattachment rate was quite high and amounted to 92%.
In the prediction of the good visual outcome after open-globe injury several factors have been identified: initial visual acuity , afferent pupillary defect, type of trauma, wound location, and retinal detachment . Thus, it should be considered in patients with both anterior and posterior segment damage after severe eye trauma classified for combined surgical procedure.
Some authors  prefer to perform TKP-assisted PPV first and suture back the corneal button. They perform TKP later, after one year, as a second procedure in selected cases, when intraocular pressure is more than 8 mmHg. However, in a study of Chen et al. 13% of eyes were enucleated due to atrophia bulbi, 62% were silicone-oil sustained, 20% of eyes were anatomically restored and 4% evolved recurrent retinal detachment .
Chun et al. published a study comparing application of temporary keratoprosthesis and endoscopy . Authors concluded that the major differences observed between the two techniques are that endoscopy allows earlier intervention and shorter surgical times than does TKP.
In conclusion, combined PPV/TKP/PKP provides the opportunity to salvage the eyes after severe ocular trauma. However, patients should be informed about the longitudinal results of this combined surgery and that visual recovery is rather poor. Careful selection of patients should be done in order to reduce the risk of complications.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
M. H. Colyer, E. D. Weber, E. D. Weichel et al., “Delayed intraocular foreign body removal without endophthalmitis during operations Iraqi freedom and enduring freedom,” Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1439–1447, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Al Sabti and S. Raizada, “Endoscope-assisted pars plana vitrectomy in severe ocular trauma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 96, no. 11, pp. 1399–1403, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Landers III, G. N. Foulks, D. M. Landers, D. Hickingbotham, and R. C. Hamilton, “Temporary keratoprosthesis for use during pars plana vitrectomy,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 615–619, 1981.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Eckardt, “A new temporary keratoprosthesis for pars plana vitrectomy,” Retina, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 1987.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Narendran, A. R. Kothari, S. Charles, V. R. Saravanan, and I. Kreissig, Principles and Practice of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, India, 2014.
C. A. Toth and M. B. Landers III, “A new wide-field temporary keratoprosthesis,” Retina, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 353–355, 1993.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Kuhn, R. Morris, C. D. Witherspoon, K. Heimann, J. B. Jeffers, and G. Treister, “A standardized classification of ocular trauma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 240–243, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Pieramici, P. Sternberg Jr., T. M. Aaberg Sr. et al., “A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe),” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 820–831, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
D. Spiegel, J. Nasemann, J. Nawrocki, and V.-P. Gabel, “Severe ocular trauma managed with primary pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil,” Retina, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 275–285, 1997.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Roters, P. Hamzei, P. Szurman et al., “Combined penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery with silicone oil: a 1-year follow-up,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Roters, P. Szurman, S. Hermes, G. Thumann, K. U. Bartz-Schmidt, and B. Kirchhof, “Outcome of combined penetrating keratoplasty with vitreoretinal surgery for management of severe ocular injuries,” Retina, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 48–56, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Dong, W. Wang, L. Xie, and A. M.-C. Chiu, “Long-term outcome of combined penetrating keratoplasty and vitreoretinal surgery using temporary keratoprosthesis,” Eye, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Brinton, T. M. Aaberg, F. H. Reeser, T. M. Topping, and G. W. Abrams, “Surgical results in ocular trauma involving the posterior segment,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 1982.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Meredith and P. A. Gordon, “Pars plana vitrectomy for severe penetrating injury with posterior segment involvement,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 549–554, 1987.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Gelender, A. Vaiser, W. B. Snyder, D. G. Fuller, and W. L. Hutton, “Temporary keratoprosthesis for combined penetrating keratoplasty, pars plana vitrectomy, and repair of retinal detachment,” Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 897–901, 1988.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. P. Gallemore and J. E. Bokosky, “Penetrating keratoplasty with vitreoretinal surgery using the Eckardt temporary keratoprosthesis: modified technique allowing use of larger corneal grafts,” Cornea, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
H.-J. Chen, C.-G. Wang, H.-L. Dou et al., “Anatomical outcome of vitreoretinal surgery using temporary keratoprosthesis and replacement of the trephined corneal button for severe open globe injuries: one-year result,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2014, Article ID 794039, 5 pages, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Chun, M. H. Colyer, and K. J. Wroblewski, “Visual and anatomic outcomes of vitrectomy with temporary keratoprosthesis or endoscopy in ocular trauma with opaque cornea,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 302–310, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar