Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2015, Article ID 380624, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/380624
Research Article

Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties by CorVis ST in Patients with Dry Eye and in Healthy Subjects

Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

Received 28 June 2015; Revised 5 September 2015; Accepted 10 September 2015

Academic Editor: Antonio Queiros

Copyright © 2015 Qin Long et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. M. Messmer, “The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of dry eye disease,” Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 71–82, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  2. N.-N. Liu, L. Liu, J. Li, and Y.-Z. Sun, “Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye symptom in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2014, Article ID 748654, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. “The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the definition and classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007),” The Ocular Surface, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 75–92, 2007.
  4. T. Huseynova, G. O. Waring IV, C. Roberts, R. R. Krueger, and M. Tomita, “Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 885–893, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Elsheikh, D. Alhasso, and P. Rama, “Assessment of the epithelium's contribution to corneal biomechanics,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 445–451, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Hessen and E. K. Akpek, “Dry eye: an inflammatory ocular disease,” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 240–250, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Wei and P. A. Asbell, “The core mechanism of dry eye disease is inflammation,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 248–256, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. L. Massingale, X. Li, M. Vallabhajosyula, D. Chen, Y. Wei, and P. A. Asbell, “Analysis of inflammatory cytokines in the tears of dry eye patients,” Cornea, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1023–1027, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Zhang, X. Yan, and H. Li, “Analysis of the correlations of mucins, inflammatory markers, and clinical tests in dry eye,” Cornea, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 928–932, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Niu, S. Zhang, J. Wu, L. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Upregulation of NLRP3 inflammasome in the tears and ocular surface of dry eye patients,” PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 5, Article ID e0126277, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Mansouri, M. T. Leite, R. N. Weinreb, A. Tafreshi, L. M. Zangwill, and F. A. Medeiros, “Association between corneal biomechanical properties and glaucoma severity,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 419–427.e1, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. S. Wolffsohn, S. Safeen, S. Shah, and M. Laiquzzaman, “Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus,” Cornea, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 849–854, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Chua, M. Vania, C. M. G. Cheung et al., “Expression profile of inflammatory cytokines in aqueous from glaucomatous eyes,” Molecular Vision, vol. 18, pp. 431–438, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. S. Jun, L. Cope, C. Speck et al., “Subnormal cytokine profile in the tear fluid of keratoconus patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e16437, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. Terai, F. Raiskup, M. Haustein, L. E. Pillunat, and E. Spoerl, “Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer,” Current Eye Research, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 553–562, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. A. Luce, “Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 156–162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. G. Firat and S. Doganay, “Corneal hysteresis in patients with dry eye,” Eye, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1570–1574, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Hon and A. K. C. Lam, “Corneal deformation measurement using scheimpflug noncontact tonometry,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. e1–e8, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Tian, D. Wang, Y. Wu et al., “Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. L. Tian, Y.-F. Huang, L.-Q. Wang et al., “Corneal biomechanical assessment using corneal visualization scheimpflug technology in keratoconic and normal eyes,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2014, Article ID 147516, 8 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Pérez-Rico, C. Gutiérrez-Ortíz, A. González-Mesa, A. M. Zandueta, A. Moreno-Salgueiro, and F. Germain, “Effect of diabetes mellitus on Corvis ST measurement process,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. e193–e198, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Z. Hassan, L. Modis Jr., E. Szalai, A. Berta, and G. Nemeth, “Examination of ocular biomechanics with a new Scheimpflug technology after corneal refractive surgery,” Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 337–341, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. F. Valbon, R. Ambrósio, B. M. Fontes, and M. R. Alves, “Effects of age on corneal deformation by non-contact tonometry integrated with an ultra-high-speed (UHS) scheimpflug camera,” Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 229–232, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. P. Piñero and N. Alcón, “In vivo characterization of corneal biomechanics,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 870–887, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Garcia-Porta, P. Fernandes, A. Queiros, J. Salgado-Borges, M. Parafita-Mato, and J. M. González-Méijome, “Corneal biomechanical properties in different ocular conditions and new measurement techniques,” ISRN Ophthalmology, vol. 2014, Article ID 724546, 19 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. I. B. Pedersen, S. Bak-Nielsen, A. H. Vestergaard, A. Ivarsen, and J. Hjortdal, “Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 252, no. 8, pp. 1329–1335, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Zhu, J. Shen, C. Zhang et al., “Inflammatory cytokine expression on the ocular surface in the Botulium toxin B induced murine dry eye model,” Molecular Vision, vol. 15, pp. 250–258, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. R. Vandermeid, S. P. Su, K. W. Ward, and J.-Z. Zhang, “Correlation of tear inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases with four dry eye diagnostic tests,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1512–1518, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Acera, G. Rocha, E. Vecino, I. Lema, and J. A. Durán, “Inflammatory markers in the tears of patients with ocular surface disease,” Ophthalmic Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 315–321, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. R. Van Doren, “Matrix metalloproteinase interactions with collagen and elastin,” Matrix Biology, vol. 44–46, pp. 224–231, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Sakimoto and M. Sawa, “Metalloproteinases in corneal diseases: degradation and processing,” Cornea, vol. 31, no. 11, supplement 1, pp. S50–S56, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. M. Meyer, M. Kronschläger, and A. R. Wegener, “Schleimpflug photography detects alterations in corneal density and thickness in patients with dry eye disease,” Der Ophthalmologe, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 914–919, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. J. Kanellopoulos and G. Asimellis, “In vivo 3-dimensional corneal epithelial thickness mapping as an indicator of dry eye: preliminary clinical assessment,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 63–68.e2, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. X. Cui, J. Hong, F. Wang et al., “Assessment of corneal epithelial thickness in dry eye patients,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 1446–1454, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Kotecha, “What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician?” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. S109–S114, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. N. S. Malik, S. J. Moss, N. Ahmed, A. J. Furth, R. S. Wall, and K. M. Meek, “Ageing of the human corneal stroma: structural and biochemical changes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1138, no. 3, pp. 222–228, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Elsheikh, B. Geraghty, P. Rama, M. Campanelli, and K. M. Meek, “Characterization of age-related variation in corneal biomechanical properties,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 7, no. 51, pp. 1475–1485, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. Kamiya, K. Shimizu, and F. Ohmoto, “Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 888–893, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. Ortiz, D. Piñero, M. H. Shabayek, F. Arnalich-Montiel, and J. L. Alió, “Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1371–1375, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. A. del Buey, L. Lavilla, F. J. Ascaso, E. Lanchares, V. Huerva, and J. A. Cristóbal, “Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in myopic Spanish healthy population,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2014, Article ID 905129, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Kotecha, D. P. Crabb, A. Spratt, and D. F. Garway-Heath, “The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 4229–4236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus