Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 613280, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/613280
Research Article

Comparison of ExPress Mini-Device Implantation Alone or Combined with Phacoemulsification for the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Białystok, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24A Street, 15-276 Białystok, Poland

Received 1 July 2015; Revised 22 September 2015; Accepted 27 September 2015

Academic Editor: Achim Langenbucher

Copyright © 2015 Łukasz Stawowski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Salim, “The role of the Ex-PRESS glaucoma filtration device in glaucoma surgery,” Seminars in Ophthalmology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 180–184, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Gandolfi, C. F. Traverso, A. Bron, E. Sellem, A. Kaplan-Messas, and M. Belkin, “Short-term results of a miniature draining implant for glaucoma in combined surgery with phacoemulsification,” Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Supplement, vol. 236, article 66, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. E. Traverso, F. De Feo, A. Messas-Kaplan et al., “Long term effect on IOP of a stainless steel glaucoma drainage implant (Ex-PRESS) in combined surgery with phacoemulsification,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 425–429, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Rivier, S. Roy, and A. Mermoud, “Ex-PRESS R-50 miniature glaucoma implant insertion under the conjunctiva combined with cataract extraction,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1946–1952, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. M. Stewart, J. G. Diamond, E. D. Ashmore, and R. S. Ayyala, “Complications following ex-press glaucoma shunt implantation,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 340.e1–340.e3, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Dahan and T. R. Carmichael, “Implantation of a miniature glaucoma device under a scleral flap,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 98–102, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. De Feo, S. Jacobson, A. Nyska, P. Pagani, and C. E. Traverso, “Histological biocompatibility of a stainless steel miniature glaucoma drainage device in humans: a case report,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 512–516, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Araie, Y. Nakano, and T. Akahoshi, “Effects of subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil injections on the corneal endothelium and ciliary epithelium,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 228, no. 6, pp. 573–581, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. N. Weinreb, “Adjusting the dose of 5-fluorouracil after filtration surgery to minimize side effects,” Ophthalmology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 564–570, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Yachimori, T. Matsuura, K. Hayashi, and H. Hayashi, “Increased intraocular pressure and corneal endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification surgery,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 453–459, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Yasutani, K. Hayashi, H. Hayashi, and F. Hayashi, “Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification surgery in glaucoma patients,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1219–1224, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Hayashi, H. Hayashi, F. Nakao, and F. Hayashi, “Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1779–1786, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Włodarczyk, A. Wesołek-Czernik, and A. Synder, “Ciśnienie śródgałkowe po fakoemulsyfikacji we wczesnym okresie pooperacyjnym,” Suplement do Kliniki Ocznej, vol. 103, pp. 1–2, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. A. Meyer, M. L. Savitt, and E. Kopitas, “The effect of phacoemulsification on aqueous outflow facility,” Ophthalmology, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 1221–1227, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. J. Shingleton, R. A. Wadhwani, M. W. O'Donoghue, S. Baylus, and H. Hoey, “Evaluation of intraocular pressure in the immediate period after phacoemulsification,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 524–527, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Rękas, K. Barchan-Kucia, J. Konopińska, Z. Mariak, and T. Żarnowski, “Analysis and modeling of anatomical changes of the anterior segment of the eye after cataract surgery with consideration of different phenotypes of eye structure,” Current Eye Research, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1018–1027, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. R. Suzuki, K. Tanaka, T. Sagara, and N. Fujiwara, “Reduction of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and aspiration with intraocular lens implantation,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 208, no. 5, pp. 254–258, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. J. Shingleton, L. S. Gamell, M. W. O'Donoghue, S. L. Baylus, and R. King, “Long-term changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification: normal patients versus glaucoma suspect and glaucoma patients,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 885–890, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Suzuki, S. Kuroki, and N. Fujiwara, “Ten-year follow-up of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and aspiration with intraocular lens implantation performed by the same surgeon,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 211, no. 2, pp. 79–83, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Tarongoy, C. L. Ho, and D. S. Walton, “Angle-closure glaucoma: the role of the lens in the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 211–225, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. O. Çekiç and C. Batman, “The relationship between capsulorhexis size and anterior chamber depth relation,” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 185–190, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Salim, “Current variations of glaucoma filtration surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 89–95, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. M. Kanner, P. A. Netland, S. R. Sarkisian, and H. Du, “Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap alone or combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 488–491, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. J. Augustinus and T. Zeyen, “The effect of phacoemulsification and combined phaco/glaucoma procedures on the intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. A review of the literature,” Bulletin de la Société belge d'Ophtalmologie, no. 320, pp. 51–66, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Chang, M. Thiagarajan, M. Moseley et al., “Intraocular pressure outcome in primary 5FU phacotrabeculectomies compared with 5FU trabeculectomies,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 475–481, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Kleinmann, H. Katz, A. Pollack, E. Schechtman, R. Rachmiel, and M. Zalish, “Comparison of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C with or without phacoemulsification and lens implantation,” Ophthalmic Surgery and Lasers, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 102–108, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. A. Netland, S. R. Sarkisian Jr., M. R. Moster et al., “Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of ex-press glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy (XVT Study),” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 433–440.e3, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Klink, B. Schmitz, W. E. Lieb et al., “Filtering bleb function after clear cornea phacoemulsification: a prospective study,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 597–601, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Jampel, “Trabeculectomy: more effective at causing cataract surgery than lowering intraocular pressure?” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 173–174, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. B. Shields, “Combined cataract extraction and guarded sclerectomy. Reevaluation in the extracapsular era,” Ophthalmology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 366–370, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. H. Brown, L. Zhong, and M. G. Lynch, “Lens-based glaucoma surgery: using cataract surgery to reduce intraocular pressure,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1255–1262, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus