Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2015, Article ID 693468, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/693468
Research Article

Novel GUCY2D Gene Mutations in Japanese Male Twins with Leber Congenital Amaurosis

1Department of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu-shi, Higashi-ku, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan
2Department of Photomedical Genomics, Basic Medical Photonics Laboratory, Medical Photonics Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu-shi, Higashi-ku, Shizuoka 431-3192, Japan

Received 3 March 2015; Accepted 28 April 2015

Academic Editor: Terri L. Young

Copyright © 2015 Katsuhiro Hosono et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Schappert-Kimmijser, H. E. Henkes, and J. van den Bosch, “Amaurosis congenita (Leber),” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 1959. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. K. Koenekoop, “An overview of leber congenital amaurosis: a model to understand human retinal development,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 379–398, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Hanein, I. Perrault, S. Gerber et al., “Leber congenital amaurosis: comprehensive survey of the genetic heterogeneity, refinement of the clinical definition, and genotype-phenotype correlations as a strategy for molecular diagnosis,” Human Mutation, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 306–317, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Hanein, I. Perrault, S. Gerber, G. Tanguy, J.-M. Rozet, and J. Kaplan, “Leber congenital amaurosis: survey of the genetic heterogeneity, refinement of the clinical definition and phenotype-genotype correlations as a strategy for molecular diagnosis. Clinical and molecular survey in LCA,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 572, pp. 15–20, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. I. den Hollander, R. Roepman, R. K. Koenekoop, and F. P. M. Cremers, “Leber congenital amaurosis: genes, proteins and disease mechanisms,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 391–419, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Yzer, B. P. Leroy, E. De Baere et al., “Microarray-based mutation detection and phenotypic characterization of patients with leber congenital amaurosis,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1167–1176, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Ogino, A. Oishi, Y. Makiyama et al., “Genotype screening of retinal dystrophies in the Japanese population using a microarray,” Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Li, X. Xiao, S. Li et al., “Detection of variants in 15 genes in 87 unrelated Chinese patients with Leber congenital amaurosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e19458, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M.-W. Seong, S. Y. Kim, Y. S. Yu, J.-M. Hwang, J. Y. Kim, and S. S. Park, “Molecular characterization of Leber congenital amaurosis in Koreans,” Molecular Vision, vol. 14, pp. 1429–1436, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Li, H. Wang, J. Peng et al., “Mutation survey of known LCA genes and loci in the Saudi Arabian population,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1336–1343, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Sundaresan, P. Vijayalakshmi, S. Thompson, A. C. Ko, J. H. Fingert, and E. M. Stone, “Mutations that are a common cause of Leber congenital amaurosis in northern America are rare in Southern India,” Molecular Vision, vol. 15, pp. 1781–1787, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Verma, V. Perumalsamy, S. Shetty, M. Kulm, and P. Sundaresan, “Mutational screening of LCA genes emphasizing RPE65 in South Indian cohort of patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e73172, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. W. B. Bainbridge, A. J. Smith, S. S. Barker et al., “Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 21, pp. 2231–2239, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. V. Cideciyan, T. S. Aleman, S. L. Boye et al., “Human gene therapy for RPE65 isomerase deficiency activates the retinoid cycle of vision but with slow rod kinetics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 39, pp. 15112–15117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. W. W. Hauswirth, T. S. Aleman, S. Kaushal et al., “Treatment of Leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: short-term results of a phase I trial,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 979–990, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. M. Maguire, F. Simonelli, E. A. Pierce et al., “Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber's congenital amaurosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 21, pp. 2240–2248, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Stieger and B. Lorenz, “Gene therapy for vision loss—recent developments,” Discovery Medicine, vol. 10, no. 54, pp. 425–433, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Mihelec, R. A. Pearson, S. J. Robbie et al., “Long-term preservation of cones and improvement in visual function following gene therapy in a mouse model of leber congenital amaurosis caused by guanylate cyclase-1 deficiency,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1179–1190, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. B. Hufnagel, Z. M. Ahmed, Z. M. Corrêa, and R. A. Sisk, “Gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis: advances and future directions,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 250, no. 8, pp. 1117–1128, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Coppieters, B. De Wilde, S. Lefever et al., “Massively parallel sequencing for early molecular diagnosis in Leber congenital amaurosis,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 576–585, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Neveling, R. W. J. Collin, C. Gilissen et al., “Next-generation genetic testing for retinitis pigmentosa,” Human Mutation, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 963–972, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. E. Shanks, S. M. Downes, R. R. Copley et al., “Next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a diagnostic tool for retinal degeneration reveals a much higher detection rate in early-onset disease,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 274–280, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. X. Wang, H. Wang, V. Sun et al., “Comprehensive molecular diagnosis of 179 Leber congenital amaurosis and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa patients by targeted next generation sequencing,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 674–688, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Glöckle, S. Kohl, J. Mohr et al., “Panel-based next generation sequencing as a reliable and efficient technique to detect mutations in unselected patients with retinal dystrophies,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. X. Jin, L. H. Qu, X. H. Meng, H. W. Xu, and Z. Q. Yin, “Detecting genetic variations in hereditary retinal dystrophies with next-generation sequencing technology,” Molecular Vision, vol. 20, pp. 553–560, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Oishi, A. Oishi, N. Gotoh et al., “Comprehensive molecular diagnosis of a large cohort of Japanese retinitis pigmentosa and Usher syndrome patients by next-generation sequencing,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 7369–7375, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. M. F. Marmor, A. B. Fulton, G. E. Holder, Y. Miyake, M. Brigell, and M. Bach, “ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update),” Documenta Ophthalmologica, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Zhao, K. Hosono, K. Suto et al., “The first USH2A mutation analysis of Japanese autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa patients: a totally different mutation profile with the lack of frequent mutations found in Caucasian patients,” Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 521–528, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. K. Hosono, C. Ishigami, M. Takahashi et al., “Two novel mutations in the EYS gene are possible major causes of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa in the japanese population,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e31036, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. W. Hentze and A. E. Kulozik, “A perfect message: RNA surveillance and nonsense-mediated decay,” Cell, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 307–310, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Katagiri, T. Hayashi, M. Kondo et al., “RPE65 mutations in two Japanese families with Leber congenital amaurosis,” Ophthalmic Genetics, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. K. Kuniyoshi, H. Sakuramoto, K. Yoshitake et al., “Longitudinal clinical course of three Japanese patients with Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset retinal dystrophy with RDH12 mutation,” Documenta Ophthalmologica, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 219–228, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Suzuki, T. Fujimaki, A. Yanagawa et al., “A novel exon 17 deletion mutation of RPGRIP1 gene in two siblings with Leber congenital amaurosis,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 528–535, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. I. Perrault, J. M. Rozet, P. Calvas et al., “Retinal-specific guanylate cyclase gene mutations in Leber's congenital amaurosis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 461–464, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J.-M. Rozet, I. Perrault, S. Gerber et al., “Complete abolition of the retinal-specific guanylyl cyclase (retGC-1) catalytic ability consistently leads to leber congenital amaurosis (LCA),” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1190–1192, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. I. Perrault, J.-M. Rozet, I. Ghazi et al., “Different functional outcome of RetGC1 and RPE65 gene mutations in leber congenital amaurosis,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1225–1228, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. R. Dharmaraj, E. R. Silva, A. L. Pina et al., “Mutational analysis and clinical correlation in Leber congenital amaurosis,” Ophthalmic Genetics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 135–150, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. K. Koenekoop, I. Lopez, A. I. den Hollander, R. Allikmets, and F. P. M. Cremers, “Genetic testing for retinal dystrophies and dysfunctions: benefits, dilemmas and solutions,” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 473–485, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus