Ocular AngiogenesisView this Special Issue
Research Article | Open Access
Katsuo Tomoyose, Yuka Okada, Takayoshi Sumioka, Masayasu Miyajima, Kathleen C. Flanders, Kumi Shirai, Tomoya Morii, Peter S. Reinach, Osamu Yamanaka, Shizuya Saika, "Suppression of In Vivo Neovascularization by the Loss of TRPV1 in Mouse Cornea", Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2015, Article ID 706404, 9 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/706404
Suppression of In Vivo Neovascularization by the Loss of TRPV1 in Mouse Cornea
To investigate the effects of loss of transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1) on the development of neovascularization in corneal stroma in mice. Blocking TRPV1 receptor did not affect VEGF-dependent neovascularization in cell culture. Lacking TRPV1 inhibited neovascularization in corneal stroma following cauterization. Immunohistochemistry showed that immunoreactivity for active form of TGFβ1 and VEGF was detected in subepithelial stroma at the site of cauterization in both genotypes of mice, but the immunoreactivity seemed less marked in mice lacking TRPV1. mRNA expression of VEGF and TGFβ1 in a mouse cornea was suppressed by the loss of TRPV1. TRPV1 gene ablation did not affect invasion of neutrophils and macrophage in a cauterized mouse cornea. Blocking TRPV1 signal does not affect angiogenic effects by HUVECs in vitro. TRPV1 signal is, however, involved in expression of angiogenic growth factors in a cauterized mouse cornea and is required for neovascularization in the corneal stroma in vivo.
The cornea is a unique ocular tissue of avascularity and transparency for proper vision. It is susceptible to neovascularization-inducing intervention, that is, microbial infection or ocular surface damage. Such unfavorable neovascularization potentially impairs vision. The process of the new vessel formation in an injured cornea is orchestrated by a complex system of various growth factor signaling [1–5]. Resident corneal cells and inflammatory cells invaded to an injured tissue express growth factors and cytokines involved in injury-induced neovascularization. Such factors include vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) [6–10].
Members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel superfamily are polymodal receptors that are activated by a host of stimuli to mediate sensory transduction. The family is divided into 7 different subfamilies and composed of 28 different genes [11–14]. TRP vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1), the capsaicin receptor, is a nociceptor and one of the prototypes of TRPV subfamily. It elicits responses to a variety of noxious stimuli including chemical irritants besides capsaicin, inflammatory mediators, tissue injury, an alteration in pH, and moderate heat (≥43°C). TRPV1 activation leads to nociception and evokes pain or pain-related behaviors and reportedly induces release of tachykinin neuropeptides from sensory nerves, inducing neurogenic inflammation in the surrounding area [15–17]. Various nonneuronal cell linages, that is, epidermal keratinocyte or corneal epithelium and keratocytes, also express TRPV1, which presumably exerts a variety of biological responses to external stimuli [18–24]. We previously reported that lacking TRPV1 counteracted inflammatory and fibrogenic reactions in corneal stroma following an alkali burn . The phenotype of less-inflammation/fibrosis was found to depend on the loss of keratocytes in the affected stroma, but not on inflammatory cells as revealed by reciprocal bone marrow transplantation experiments. Stromal neovascularization is also a component of the biological reaction observed in an injured cornea. In our previous study on an alkali-burned cornea, however, we failed to extract the effects of the loss of TRPV1 on injury-induced neovascularization in an alkali-burned cornea due to complex tissue reaction in the stroma. It was reported that capsiate and piperine, both TRPV1 agonists, suppress angiogenic behaviors of vascular endothelial cells cultured in the absence of inflammatory components in vitro [25, 26]. In vivo role of TRPV1 signal in modulation of neovascularization is to be assessed in in vivo condition. In the present study we examined the roles of TRPV1 signal in the activity of neovascularization development by using TRPV1-null (KO) mice and in vitro human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) culture model of neovascularization.
2. Materials and Methods
In vivo experiments were approved by the DNA Recombination Experiment Committee and the Animal Care and Use Committee of Wakayama Medical University and performed in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.
2.1. Coculture Experiment of Tube-Like Structure Formation by HUVECs
We first employed in vitro assay of angiogenic activity of HUVECs. The degree of tube-like structure formation by HUVECs on a fibroblast feeder layer was employed to assess the effects of each agent on neovascularization activity of the cells. The detailed procedure was reported in our previous publications [8, 27]. HUVECs were seeded on the fibroblast feeder layer as the manufacture suggested (NV kit, Kurabo, Tokyo, Japan). Then the culture was maintained in the routine culture condition in the presence of vascular endothelial cell growth factor- (VEGF-) A (10.0 ng/ml, Kurabo, Tokyo, Japan) as an angiogenesis inducer in the presence or absence of a TRPV1 antagonist, SB366791 (10 μM, Sigma-Aldrich). HUVECs did not develop tube-like structure in the absence of VEGF (data not shown). Eight wells were prepared for each culture condition. After 11 days of culture the cells were processed for immunohistochemistry for CD31 (a marker for vascular endothelium) according to the manufacture’s protocol. Color development was performed by 3,3′-diaminobentidine (DAB) reaction [8, 27]. Average length and the average number of bifurcations (the number of branching points) were counted in three central fields in each well in a blinded fashion by an investigator. The mean value of the data from these three fields represented the data of each well. Statistical analysis of the data from eight wells was conducted by employing Tukey-Kramer test and < 0.05 was taken as significant.
2.2. Induction of Stromal Neovascularization by Cauterization of the Central Cornea in Mice
We then performed an in vivo neovascularization assessment experiment by using a wild-type (WT) of C57Bl/6 ( = 52) or KO mouse of C57Bl/6 background ( = 65) as previously reported . KO mice were healthy without any obvious general abnormalities and were fertile. There was no difference in the histological findings in an uninjured cornea between a WT and KO mice as previously reported . Corneal stromal neovascularization from the limbal vessels was induced by cauterization of the central cornea of an eye of both WT and KO mice by disposable cauterization tool as previously reported .
We first observed the morphology of neovascularization at day 3 after cauterization in whole-mounted specimens by using CD34 immunostaining. Four WT and 4 KO mice were used. Mice were sacrificed at day 3 after cauterization in the central cornea by CO2 asphyxia. The eye was enucleated, processed for whole-mounted immunostaining. The eyes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hrs. After washing in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the specimens were treated in 0.5% Triton X for 1 hr to facilitate the antibody penetration into the tissue. After rinsing in PBS, the samples were allowed to react with a monoclonal anti-CD31 antibody (1 : 100 in PBS, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 24 hrs at 4°C. After washing the antibody the tissues were then treated with a FITC-labeled secondary antibody (Southern Biotechnology, Birmingham, Alabama, USA) for 12 hrs at 4°C, mounted in Fluoromount-G after another wash in PBS, and observed under Carl Zeiss Apotome. 2 AxioVision 4.8 fluorescence microscopy.
We then examined the length of neovascularization from limbus toward the center of the cornea following cauterization in histological section. For this purpose, 15, 16, or 8 WT mice and 21, 21, or 10 KO mice were used for assessment at day 3, 7, or 14, respectively. Mice were sacrificed at days 3, 7, and 14 after cauterization in the central cornea by CO2 asphyxia. The eye was enucleated, processed for cryosections, and used for immunohistochemistry for CD31 (monoclonal, 1 : 100 in PBS, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) as previously reported . The length of corneal stromal neovascularization was measured as follows: length between limbus and the tip of neovascularization was measured in both sides of the limbus in three cryosections produced from one eye. The average value of the six data represented the neovascularization in one cornea. Statistical analysis was conducted with the use of Mann-Whitney test, and p < 0.05 was taken as significant.
Cornea of three eyes of each genotype of mice was also cauterized and then processed for paraffin section immunohistochemistry for active form of TGFβ1, VEGF, substance P, and F4/80 macrophage antigen as previously reported. As described below we semiquantified mRNA expression of TGFβ1 in treated corneas and TGFβ1 exerts its action after processing to the active form. We therefore used an antibody that reacts the active, but not inactive, form of TGFβ1 in the current study [24, 29].
2.4. Gene Expression Analysis
We examined the expression of mRNAs of neovascularization-related growth factors and the degree of inflammation in in vivo mouse cornea. We considered mRNA level quantification was essential because our preliminary immunohistochemistry for VEGF and TGFβ1 showed very faint staining with minimal difference of the staining in central corneal stroma between a WT and a KO mouse. Centrally cauterized cornea ( = 6 in each of WT or KO group) was excised at day 3. Total RNA was extracted from these tissues and processed for TaqMan real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for VEGF, TGFβ1, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and F4/80 macrophage antigen and as previously reported . Delta/delta CT method by Applied Biosystem Inc. was employed with the internal control of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) expression. Primers (Applied Biosystem Inc.) used were described in the following list. Data were statistically analyzed by employing Mann-Whitney test.
Primers Used (Applied Biosystem Inc.). Consider vascular endothelial growth factor: Mm01281447_ml; transforming growth factor β1: Mm03024053_ml; substance P: Mm01166996_ml; interleukin-6: Mm01210732_gl; myeloperoxidase: Mm01298422_gl; F4/80: Mm00802524_ml.
3.1. In Vitro Experiment of Tube-Like Structure Formation by HUVECs
Dense CD31 immunoreactivity was detected in tissue where HUVECs formed a vessel-like tube structure. Without exogenous VEGF, HUVECs grown on the fibroblast feeder layer did not form a vessel-like tube tissue. The HUVEC culture was processed for CD31 immunocytochemistry at day 11 (Figure 1(a)). The angiogenic behaviors of HUVECs were evaluated by measurement of the mean total length of the structure (Figure 1(b)) and of the men number of bifurcations (Figure 1(c)) in randomly selected fields of the culture as described above. In the culture with VEGF-A (10 μg/ml) CD31-labeled tube-like structure was observed. Supplementation of a TRPV1 antagonist, SB366791 (10 μM), did not affect VEGF-A action on tube-like structure formation by HUVECs (Figure 1).
3.2. Neovascularization in Corneal Stroma
We first observed the morphology of neovascularization in whole-mounted specimens by employing CD31 immunostaining. Figure 2 shows the morphology of limbal vasculature of WT and KO corneas at day 3. In both WT (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)) and KO (Figure 2(c)) corneas loop-like distributions of blood vessels were observed. In WT corneas neovascularization was observed in the stroma apart from the limbus, although the staining procedure did not figure the continuous elongation of the vessels (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)).
We then measured the length of neovascularization in the stroma in histology section. CD31 immunostaining was performed in cryosections of the mouse cornea (Figure 3(a)). In WT mouse corneas, development of the CD31-labeled neovascularization from the limbus in the corneal stroma was detected in the peripheral cornea as early as at day 3 (Figure 3(a)). The length of the neovascularization between the limbus (arrowheads) and the tip (arrows) of new vessels in the corneal stroma was measured at each timepoint.
The length of neovascularization was shorter in KO mice as compared with WT mice at day 3 and day 7, but not at day 14 (Figure 3(b)).
3.3. Expression of Inflammatory and Angiogenic Components in Centrally Cauterized Cornea
Immunohistochemistry showed that active forms of TGFβ1, VEGF, and substance P were not detected in untreated cornea of both genotypes of mice (not shown). Active form of TGFβ1 was detected in stroma just beneath the epithelium in the area of cauterization at days 3 and 7 in WT mice (Figures 4(a) and 4(c)). Its immunoreactivity was quite less marked in cornea of KO mice (Figures 4(b) and 4(d)). VEGF was also not detected in uninjured corneas of both genotypes of mice. At day 1 after cauterization very faint VEGF immunoreactivity was observed in basal cells of corneal epithelia in cauterization area of both WT and KO mice (Figures 4(e) and 4(f)). At day 3 the basal epithelial cells with VEGF immunoreactivity were more frequently observed in a WT cornea as compared with a KO mouse (Figures 4(g) and 4(h)). Immunoreactivity for substance P was detected in basal layer of corneal epithelium with no obvious difference in intensity between WT and KO mice at days 1 and 3 (Figures 4(i), 4(j), 4(k), and 4(l)).
We then examined mRNA expression of VEGF and TGFβ1, the major two growth factors reportedly involved in corneal neovascularization in day 3 specimens by using real-time RT-PCR. Expression of mRNAs of both VEGF (Figure 5(a)) and TGFβ1 was significantly less in a KO cornea as compared with a WT cornea at day 3 (Figure 5(b)). TRPV1 signal is reportedly involved in expression of substance P and interleukin-6 (IL-6), both involved in local tissue inflammation. However, in the present study the loss of TRPV1 did not affect mRNA expression level of substance P (Figure 5(c)) and IL-6 (Figure 5(d)) in the centrally cauterized cornea at this timepoint.
3.4. Expression of Inflammatory Cell Markers in Centrally Cauterized Cornea
We previously reported that cauterization in the central cornea induced inflammation in the affected area of tissues. We therefore first examined distribution of F4/80-labeled macrophages by using immunohistochemistry and saw difference of distribution of F4/80-labeled macrophages (Figure 6(a)). We then semiquantified the invasion of neutrophils and macrophages in tissues by conducting real-time RT-PCRs for mRNAs of MPO, a neutrophil marker, and F4/80. The loss of TRPV1 exhibited no remarkable effect on mRNA expression of these cell markers (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)).
The present experiments first showed that lacking TRPV1 cation channel receptor suppressed stromal neovascularization in an in vivo mouse cornea following receiving a cauterization injury at the central cornea. Neovascularization was found to sprout from the loop-shaped vessels of the limbus toward the center of the corneal stroma in whole-mounted samples of WT tissues, while such neovascularization was much less in a KO cornea at day 3. The distance between limbus and the tip of the neovascularization in the stroma was significantly shorter in a KO cornea and compared with a WT mouse. Cell culture experiment showed that blockage of TRPV1 receptor did not affect VEGF angiogenic action on HUVECs. HUVECs do not reportedly express TRPV1 , and thus the present in vivo finding of less angiogenesis observed in a KO cornea was not attributed to the direct effects of the loss of TRPV1 on vascular endothelial cells. Although various growth factors that potentially affect neovascularization activity are expressed in an injured cornea during tissue repair [29–32], expression of such components is reportedly modulated by ion channel receptor signaling, that is, signaling derived from TRP family members.
To analyze the mechanism of antiangiogenic effect of lacking TRPV1 in in vivo corneal stroma we conducted further experiments. Because TRPV1 signal is involved in inflammation in response to external stimuli, which potentially affect formation of neovascularization, we ran real-time RT-PCR for inflammatory/angiogenic growth factors and inflammation/wound healing-related components. The results showed that mRNA expression of VEGF and TGFβ1 in cauterized cornea was suppressed by lacking TRPV1, but expression of mRNA of IL-6 was not affected by the loss of TRPV1. Immunohistochemistry also showed that deposition of active form of TGFβ1 in the stroma beneath the regenerated epithelium and VEGF expression in the basal epithelial cells in the central cornea both seemed less in amount in a KO tissue as compared with a WT mouse. We reported that TGFβ1 is expressed in corneal epithelium and is deposited in stroma beneath the regenerated epithelium as an active form . Thus, reduced accumulation of active form of TGFβ1 in the KO cornea might be attributable to the suppression of TGFβ1 expression in epithelium after cauterization by the loss of TRPV1. Similarly, postcauterization VEGF expression in corneal epithelium was suppressed by lacking TRPV1. IL-6 was not detected by immunohistochemistry presumably because the protein might be secreted out from the cells.
We also examined the level of inflammation in cornea. Immunohistochemistry did not show difference of F4/80-labeled macrophage infiltration. We then ran semiquantification by real-time RT-PCR. The present assessment of inflammatory cell markers, that is, MPO and F4/40, indicated that following cauterization in the central cornea the loss of TRPV1 did not affect infiltration of neutrophil leukocytes and macrophages. Data from these real-time RT-PCR results suggest that less expression of angiogenic growth factors, that is, VEGF and TGFβ1, is unattributed to the alteration of the level of inflammatory cell infiltration following cauterization in a KO tissue and presumably is dependent on the effects of lacking TRPV1 on the gene expression in resident corneal cells, that is, corneal epithelial cells. Involvement of keratocytes in the suppression of neovascularization in the KO mouse is to be further investigated. TRPV1 in sensory nerve fibers reportedly mediates expression of neuroinflammatory mediators, for example, substance P [34, 35]. In the present study protein and mRNA expressions of substance P were similar in WT and KO corneas after cauterization.
In conclusion, blocking TRPV1 signal might be beneficial in suppression of neovascularization in cornea.
The abstract of the current study was presented by Dr. Tomoyose in the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO 2013, Seattle).
Conflict of Interests
The authors have declared that there is no conflict of interests regarding the paper.
This study was supported by grant from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (C40433362 to Takayoshi Sumioka, C21592241 to Yuka Okada, and C19592036 to Shizuya Saika).
- F. Bock, K. Maruyama, B. Regenfuss et al., “Novel anti(lymph)angiogenic treatment strategies for corneal and ocular surface diseases,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 89–124, 2013.
- J. L. Clements and R. Dana, “Inflammatory corneal neovascularization: etiopathogenesis,” Seminars in Ophthalmology, vol. 26, no. 4-5, pp. 235–245, 2011.
- D. Meller, R. T. F. Pires, R. J. S. Mack et al., “Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute chemical or thermal burns,” Ophthalmology, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 980–989, 2000.
- S. Saika, O. Yamanaka, T. Sumioka et al., “Fibrotic disorders in the eye: targets of gene therapy,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 177–196, 2008.
- D. T. Azar, “Corneal angiogenic privilege: angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in corneal avascularity, vasculogenesis, and wound healing (an American Ophthalmological Society Thesis),” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 104, pp. 264–302, 2006.
- M. Papathanassiou, P. G. Theodossiadis, V. S. Liarakos, A. Rouvas, E. J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, and I. A. Vergados, “Inhibition of corneal neovascularization by subconjunctival bevacizumab in an animal model,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 424.e1–431.e1, 2008.
- S. Saika, “TGFβ pathobiology in the eye,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 106–115, 2006.
- S. Fujita, S. Saika, W. W.-Y. Kao et al., “Endogenous TNFα suppression of neovascularization in corneal stroma in mice,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 3051–3055, 2007.
- W. Stevenson, S.-F. Cheng, M. H. Dastjerdi, G. Ferrari, and R. Dana, “Corneal neovascularization and the utility of topical VEGF inhibition: ranibizumab (Lucentis) Vs bevacizumab (Avastin),” Ocular Surface, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 67–83, 2012.
- M. E. Francis, S. Uriel, and E. M. Brey, “Endothelial cell-matrix interactions in neovascularization,” Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2008.
- S. F. Pedersen, G. Owsianik, and B. Nilius, “TRP channels: an overview,” Cell Calcium, vol. 38, no. 3-4, pp. 233–252, 2005.
- I. S. Ramsey, M. Delling, and D. E. Clapham, “An introduction to TRP channels,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 68, pp. 619–647, 2006.
- G. Owsianik, K. Talavera, T. Voets, and B. Nilius, “Permeation and selectivity of TRP channels,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 68, pp. 685–717, 2006.
- C. Montell, L. Birnbaumer, and V. Flockerzi, “The TRP channels, a remarkably functional family,” Cell, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 595–598, 2002.
- M. J. Caterina, M. A. Schumacher, M. Tominaga, T. A. Rosen, J. D. Levine, and D. Julius, “The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway,” Nature, vol. 389, no. 6653, pp. 816–824, 1997.
- M. J. Caterina, A. Leffler, A. B. Malmberg et al., “Impaired nociception and pain sensation in mice lacking the capsaicin receptor,” Science, vol. 288, no. 5464, pp. 306–313, 2000.
- J. B. Davis, J. Gray, M. J. Gunthorpe et al., “Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia,” Nature, vol. 405, no. 6783, pp. 183–187, 2000.
- F. Zhang, H. Yang, Z. Wang et al., “Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 activation induces inflammatory cytokine release in corneal epithelium through MAPK signaling,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 213, no. 3, pp. 730–739, 2007.
- H. Yang, Z. Wang, J. E. Capó-Aponte, F. Zhang, Z. Pan, and P. S. Reinach, “Epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation by the cannabinoid receptor (CB1) and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) induces differential responses in corneal epithelial cells,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 462–471, 2010.
- Z. Pan, Z. Wang, H. Yang, F. Zhang, and P. S. Reinach, “TRPV1 activation is required for hypertonicity-stimulated inflammatory cytokine release in human corneal epithelial cells,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 485–493, 2011.
- Z. Wang, Y. Yang, H. Yang et al., “NF-κB feedback control of JNK1 activation modulates TRPV1-induced increases in IL-6 and IL-8 release by human corneal epithelial cells,” Molecular Vision, vol. 17, pp. 3137–3146, 2011.
- Y. Yang, H. Yang, Z. Wang et al., “Cannabinoid receptor 1 suppresses transient receptor potential vanilloid 1-induced inflammatory responses to corneal injury,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 501–511, 2013.
- Y. M. Lee, S. M. Kang, and J. H. Chung, “The role of TRPV1 channel in aged human skin,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 81–85, 2012.
- Y. Okada, P. S. Reinach, K. Shirai et al., “TRPV1 involvement in inflammatory tissue fibrosis in mice,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2654–2664, 2011.
- B.-J. Pyun, S. Choi, Y. Lee et al., “Capsiate, a nonpungent capsaicin-like compound, inhibits angiogenesis and vascular permeability via a direct inhibition of Src kinase activity,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 227–235, 2008.
- C. D. Doucette, A. L. Hilchie, R. Liwski, and D. W. Hoskin, “Piperine, a dietary phytochemical, inhibits angiogenesis,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 231–239, 2013.
- K. Fujita, T. Miyamoto, and S. Saika, “Sonic hedgehog: its expression in a healing cornea and its role in neovascularization,” Molecular Vision, vol. 15, pp. 1036–1044, 2009.
- T. Sumioka, N. Fujita, A. Kitano, Y. Okada, and S. Saika, “Impaired angiogenic response in the cornea of mice lacking tenascin C,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2462–2467, 2011.
- S. Saika, T. Miyamoto, O. Yamanaka et al., “Therapeutic effect of topical administration of SN50, an inhibitor of nuclear factor-κB, in treatment of corneal alkali burns in mice,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1393–1403, 2005.
- S. Saika, K. Ikeda, O. Yamanaka et al., “Therapeutic effects of adenoviral gene transfer of bone morphogenic protein-7 on a corneal alkali injury model in mice,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 474–486, 2005.
- S. Saika, K. Ikeda, O. Yamanaka et al., “Expression of Smad7 in mouse eyes accelerates healing of corneal tissue after exposure to alkali,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1405–1418, 2005.
- S. Saika, K. Ikeda, O. Yamanaka et al., “Loss of tumor necrosis factor α potentiates transforming growth factor β-mediated pathogenic tissue response during wound healing,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 168, no. 6, pp. 1848–1860, 2006.
- S. Saika, “TGF-β signal transduction in corneal wound healing as a therapeutic target,” Cornea, vol. 23, no. 8, supplement, pp. S25–S30, 2004.
- M. A. Engel, M. Khalil, S. M. Mueller-Tribbensee et al., “The proximodistal aggravation of colitis depends on substance P released from TRPV1-expressing sensory neurons,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 256–265, 2012.
- R. J. Steagall, A. L. Sipe, C. A. Williams, W. L. Joyner, and K. Singh, “Substance P release in response to cardiac ischemia from rat thoracic spinal dorsal horn is mediated by TRPV1,” Neuroscience, vol. 214, pp. 106–119, 2012.
Copyright © 2015 Katsuo Tomoyose et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.