Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2015, Article ID 767012, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/767012
Research Article

Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes

1School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China
2Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
3G. B. Bietti Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy

Received 7 October 2015; Accepted 16 November 2015

Academic Editor: David P. Piñero

Copyright © 2015 Ayong Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Wang, J. Chen, and B. Yang, “Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 406–410, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. J. Doughty and M. L. Zaman, “Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 367–408, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. G. U. Auffarth, L. Wang, and H. E. Völcker, “Keratoconus evaluation using the Orbscan Topography System,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Ö. Ö. Uçakhan, M. Özkan, and A. Kanpolat, “Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 970–977, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. A. Swarbrick, G. Wong, and D. J. O'Leary, “Corneal response to orthokeratology,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 791–799, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Barkana, Y. Gerber, U. Elbaz et al., “Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1729–1735, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Huang, X. Ding, G. Savini et al., “A comparison between scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 10, pp. 1951–1958, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Huang, K. Pesudovs, A. Yu et al., “A comprehensive comparison of central corneal thickness measurement,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 940–949, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Khoramnia, T. M. Rabsilber, and G. U. Auffarth, “Central and peripheral pachymetry measurements according to age using the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 830–836, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Q. Ali, D. V. Patel, and C. N. J. McGhee, “Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 3651–3659, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Hon and A. K. C. Lam, “Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. e1–e8, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Nemeth, Z. Hassan, A. Csutak, E. Szalai, A. Berta, and L. Modis Jr., “Repeatability of ocular biomechanical data measurements with a scheimpflug-based noncontact device on normal corneas,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 558–563, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. X. Chen, A. Stojanovic, Y. Hua et al., “Reliability of corneal dynamic scheimpflug analyser measurements in virgin and post-PRK eyes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e109577, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Katz, S. Zeger, and K.-Y. Liang, “Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2461–2465, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Measurement error,” British Medical Journal, vol. 313, no. 7059, article 744, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8476, pp. 307–310, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. L. Salvetat, M. Zeppieri, C. Tosoni, M. Felletti, L. Grasso, and P. Brusini, “Corneal deformation parameters provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 568–574, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. N. Al-Mohtaseb, L. Wang, and M. P. Weikert, “Repeatability and comparability of corneal thickness measurements obtained from Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer and from ultrasonic pachymetry,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 251, no. 7, pp. 1855–1860, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. J. Maldonado, A. López-Miguel, J. C. Nieto, J. Cano-Parra, B. Calvo, and J. L. Alió, “Reliability of noncontact pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 4135–4141, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. Bao, Q. Wang, S. Cheng et al., “Comparison and evaluation of central corneal thickness using 2 new noncontact specular microscopes and conventional pachymetry devices,” Cornea, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 576–581, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Menassa, C. Kaufmann, M. Goggin, O. M. Job, L. M. Bachmann, and M. A. Thiel, “Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1742–1747, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Chen and A. K. C. Lam, “Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam system on posterior corneal assessment in the normal human eye,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 448–454, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Chen and A. K. C. Lam, “Reliability and repeatability of the Pentacam on corneal curvatures,” Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 110–118, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. R. Lattimore Jr., S. Kaupp, S. Schallhorn, and Rt. Lewis, “Orbscan pachymetry: implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 977–981, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. M. Nam, H. K. Lee, E. K. Kim, and K. Y. Seo, “Comparison of corneal thickness after the instillation of topical anesthetics: proparacaine versus oxybuprocaine,” Cornea, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 51–54, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Amano, N. Honda, Y. Amano et al., “Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography,” Ophthalmology, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 937–941, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Lanza, E. Paolillo, U. A. Gironi Carnevale et al., “Central corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes with three different optical devices,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 409–413, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. W. A. Khaja, S. Grover, A. T. Kelmenson, L. R. Ferguson, K. Sambhav, and K. V. Chalam, “Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 9, pp. 1065–1070, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  29. A. Smedowski, B. Weglarz, D. Tarnawska, K. Kaarniranta, and E. Wylegala, “Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 666–673, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Huang, X. Ding, G. Savini et al., “Central and midperipheral corneal thickness measured with Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e98316, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. A. Anayol, E. Güler, R. Yağci et al., “Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices,” Cornea, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 582–586, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. Maresca, F. Zeri, P. Palumbo, and A. Calossi, “Agreement and reliability in measuring central corneal thickness with a rotating Scheimpflug-Placido system and ultrasound pachymetry,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 442–446, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Feizi, M. R. Jafarinasab, F. Karimian, H. Hasanpour, and A. Masudi, “Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement in normal and keratoconic eyes using three corneal pachymeters,” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, vol. 9, pp. 296–304, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  34. P. De La Parra-Colín, M. Garza-León, and T. Barrientos-Gutierrez, “Repeatability and comparability of anterior segment biometry obtained by the Sirius and the Pentacam analyzers,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Jorgel, J. Rosado, J. Diaz-Rey, and J. Gonzalez-Meijome, “Central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurement by Sirius Scheimpflug tomography and ultrasound,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 7, pp. 417–422, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. H. A. Bayhan, S. A. Bayhan, and I. Can, “Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 302–308, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Huang, G. Savini, L. Hu et al., “Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 219–224, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. N. Nassiri, K. Sheibani, S. Safi et al., “Central corneal thickness in highly myopic eyes: Inter-device agreement of ultrasonic pachymetry, Pentacam and Orbscan II before and after photorefractive keratectomy,” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. H. M. Al Farhan, W. M. Al Otaibi, H. M. Al Razqan, and A. A. Al Harqan, “Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 13, no. 1, article 73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L.-Y. Tai, K.-W. Khaw, C.-M. Ng, and V. Subrayan, “Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry,” Cornea, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 766–771, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Chen, J. Huang, D. Wen, W. Chen, D. Huang, and Q. Wang, “Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 449–455, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Aramberri, L. Araiz, A. Garcia et al., “Dual versus single Scheimpflug camera for anterior segment analysis: Precision and agreement,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1934–1949, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. González-Pérez, J. M. González-Méijome, M. T. Rodríguez Ares, and M. Á. Parafita, “Central corneal thickness measured with three optical devices and ultrasound pachometry,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 66–70, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus