Research Article

Characterization of Visual Symptomatology Associated with Refractive, Accommodative, and Binocular Anomalies

Table 7

Adjusted estimation of the association between visual symptomatology and all diagnosed dysfunctions including the different grades of dysfunctions according to the number of clinical signs used (RD: refractive dysfunction; AD: accommodative dysfunction; BD: binocular dysfunction; CI: confidence interval).

OR
RawCI 95%AdjustedCI 95%

RD2.471.12–5.470.026NANANA

AD suspect, high suspect, and definite4.601.49–14.180.0082.340.55–9.970.249
AD high suspect and definite3.911.15–13.230.0292.200.44–11.050.340
AD definite11.711.21–113.810.0340.999

BD suspect, high suspect, and definite3.841.58–9.350.0033.351.03–10.910.045
BD high suspect and definite4.281.69–10.850.0024.101.12–15.020.033
BD definite6.832.20–21.210.0018.791.59–48.650.013

AD + BD14.641.57–136.330.0188.790.84–91.490.069

OR adjusted by an uncorrected refractive error.
Significant association.