Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5185207, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5185207
Research Article

Evaluation of Anterior Segment’s Structures in Tilted Disc Syndrome

1Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey
2Inonu University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Malatya, Turkey

Received 13 June 2016; Revised 26 July 2016; Accepted 3 August 2016

Academic Editor: Edward Manche

Copyright © 2016 Ercan Ozsoy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Williams, A. Williams, and D. Austen, “The tilted disc syndrome,” Practical Neurology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54–55, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. J. Apple, M. F. Rabb, and P. M. Walsh, “Congenital anomalies of the optic disc,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–41, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Gündüz, C. Evereklioglu, H. Er, and I. F. Hepşen, “Lenticular astigmatism in tilted disc syndrome,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1836–1840, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Ciftci, “Unilateral tilted disc and ipsilateral keratoconus in the same eye,” BMJ Case Reports, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Vongphanit, P. Mitchell, and J. J. Wang, “Population prevalence of tilted optic disks and the relationship of this sign to refractive error,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 679–685, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M.-L. Vuori and M. Mäntyjärvi, “Tilted disc syndrome and colour vision,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 648–652, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y. Barkana, Y. Gerber, U. Elbaz et al., “Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1729–1735, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. M. Rabsilber, R. Khoramnia, and G. U. Auffarth, “Anterior chamber measurements using Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 456–459, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Cumurcu, S. Sener, E. Ozsoy, and S. Doganay, “Changes in anterior chamber parameters with the pentacam rotating scheimpflug and axial length measurements by ultrasound in patients who use isotretinoin,” Current Eye Research, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 395–398, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Arici, S. Demircan, A. Topalkara, and C. Güler, “Four sisters with tilted disc,” Journal of Retina-Vitreous, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54–57, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. J. Apple, “New aspects of colobomas and optic nerve anomalies,” International Ophthalmology Clinics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 109–121, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Ornek and M. Ozdemir, “Central corneal thickness in tilted disc syndrome,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. E350–E352, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. B. Jonas, F. Kling, and A. E. Grundler, “Optic disc shape, corneal astigmatism, and amblyopia,” Ophthalmology, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 1934–1937, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. B. Jonas and K. A. Königsreuther, “Macrodiscs in eyes with flat and large corneas,” German journal of ophthalmology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 179–181, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. A. Dohadwala and K. F. Damji, “Familial occurrence of artefactual ocular hypertension from thick corneas and of primary open angle glaucoma in a French Canadian kindred,” Ophthalmic Genetics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Pakravan, A. Parsa, M. Sanagou, and C. F. Parsa, “Central corneal thickness and correlation to optic disc size: a potential link for susceptibility to glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 26–28, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Chihara and K. Chihara, “Covariation of optic disc measurements and ocular parameters in the healthy eye,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 232, no. 5, pp. 265–271, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Dehghani, M. H. Nowroozzadeh, S. Shankar, and M. R. Razeghinejad, “Ocular refractive and biometric characteristics in patients with tilted disc syndrome,” Optometry, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 688–694, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. J. Hashemian, M. Soleimani, A. Foroutan et al., “Ocular higher-order aberrations and mesopic pupil size in individuals screened for refractive surgery,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 222–225, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. I.-J. Wang and F.-R. Hu, “The new generation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 83–86, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus