Corneal-Based Surgical Presbyopic Therapies and Their Application in Pseudophakic Patients

Table 2

Published studies of corneal inlays in pseudophakic patients.

Publication	Number of patients, IOL type	Technique	Length of follow-up	Change in monocular (and binocular) visual		Illumination conditions
				acuities for uncorrected distance and near vision
				Change in UNVA (tested at 30 cm)	Change in UDVA (tested at 20 feet unless otherwise indicated)
Huseynova et al., 2013 [11]	3, phakic IOLs	Kamra; (2 patients had prior LASIK)	3 months	2–5 lines (J4 to J2, J6 to J4, and J10 to J5)	No change in mean	Not mentioned
Huseynova et al., 2014 [12]	13, monofocal IOLs	Kamra; (4 patients underwent simultaneous or prior LASIK)	3 months	5 lines mean improvement (J10 to J4)	No change in mean	“Standard bright light conditions”
Stojanovic et al., 2014 [13]	1, monofocal IOL	Presbia Microlens	2 years	J3 to J1 (binocular J3 to J1)	20/25 to 20/32 (binocular 20/20, no change)	Not mentioned
Ziaei and Mearza, 2013 [14]	1, monofocal IOL	Kamra (simultaneous LASIK)	6 months	J17 to J3	6/10 to 6/5	Not mentioned

N.B. Intermediate visual acuity was not reported in any of these studies. Except where indicated, binocular visual acuities were not reported in these studies.