Journal of Ophthalmology / 2016 / Article / Tab 1 / Clinical Study
Comparison between Limbal and Pars Plana Approaches Using Microincision Vitrectomy for Removal of Congenital Cataracts with Primary Intraocular Lens Implantation Table 1 Patient demographics.
Characteristics Limbal ( ) Pars plana ( ) valueAge at surgery, mean (range, months) 49 (18–72) 44 (18–72) 0.414 Category of age at surgery, (eyes) (%) 1.5 to 3 years 14 (35.0) 15 (36.6)
0.588/0.501 3 to 5 years 19 (47.5) 15 (36.6) 5 to 6 years 7 (17.5) 11 (26.9) Male/female 15/11 15/15 0.601 Unilateral, (%) 11 (27.5) 16 (39.0) 0.347 Type of cataract, (%) Total 13 (32.5) 16 (39.0)
0.082 Fetal nuclear 10 (25.0) 11 (26.8) Lamellar 6 (15.0) 0 (0) Posterior polar 11 (27.5) 14 (34.1) Strabismus, (%) 8 (20.0) 12 (29.3) 0.441 Nystagmus, (%) 6 (15.0) 7 (17.1) 1.000 Axial length, (mm, range) 21.81 (19.48–24.77) 22.23 (19.03–24.66) 0.186 ECD, (mm2 , range) 3128 (2693–3623) 3080 (2321–3577) 0.360 IOP (mmHg, range) 13.6 (9.1–19.0) 14.4 (10.1–20.3) 0.181 IOL position, (%) Capsular bag 36 (90.0) 32 (78.0) 0.226 Sulcus 4 (10.0) 9 (22.0) IOL power, (D, range) +22.2 (+13.0–+31.0) +21.2 (+13.0–+30.0) 0.316 Follow-up time (months, range) 31 (24–48) 57 (36–77) <0.001
= statistically significant. Pearson’s chi2 test. IOP = intraocular pressure; IOL = intraocular lens; D = diopter; ECD = endothelial cell density; = number.