Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017, Article ID 1203269, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1203269
Research Article

Intraocular Pressure, Axial Length, and Refractive Changes after Phacoemulsification and Trabeculectomy for Open-Angle Glaucoma

1Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu 37 Street, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
2Emergency University Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Splaiul Independentei 169, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
3Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
4Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
5Singapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road Discovery Tower Level 6, Singapore 169856
6Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Novena Campus, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308232
7Ophthalmological Emergency Hospital, Alexandru Lahovari 1 Square, Bucharest, Romania

Correspondence should be addressed to Raluca Claudia Iancu; moc.oohay@2002elisavacular

Received 9 March 2017; Accepted 30 April 2017; Published 4 June 2017

Academic Editor: Antonio Queiros

Copyright © 2017 Alina Popa-Cherecheanu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose. To compare changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), axial eye length (AEL), and refractive outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery and trabeculectomy in dependence of the sequence of surgeries. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively analysed 48 eyes. The changes in refraction, intraocular pressure, and axial eye length were analysed after surgery. In group A (21 subjects), phacoemulsification was performed before trabeculectomy, and in group B (27 subjects), trabeculectomy was performed before phacoemulsification with a minimum time span between interventions of 6 months. Results. The reduction in IOP and the decrease in AEL after trabeculectomy were significant after 6 and 12 months postsurgery ( each). The decrease in AEL was 0.42 ± 0.11% at 6 months after surgery and 0.40 ± 0.13% after 12 months from surgery; this decrease in AEL was comparable between the groups. The refractive outcome was significantly different between the groups (group A: 0.35 ± 0.75 dpt, group B: −0.05 ± 0.36 dpt, ); in group A, trabeculectomy caused a hyperopic shift of 0.34 ± 0.44 dpt () at 12 months postsurgery. Conclusion. IOP reduction after trabeculectomy causes AEL shortening. The effect on refractive outcome depends on the sequence of surgeries. Better refractive outcome is achieved if phacoemulsification is performed after trabeculectomy.

1. Introduction

Glaucoma surgery, including trabeculectomy, is aimed to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP). This decrease in IOP is associated with changes in several ocular factors such as shortening of axial eye length (AEL), change in lamina cribrosa position, and increase in ocular blood flow [19]. The amount of changes in the eye will depend on the biomechanical properties of the eyeball and will affect ocular refraction [1013].

This is relevant when glaucoma surgery and phacoemulsification are done in the same eye. One study compared the eyes that underwent phacoemulsification at least 3 months after trabeculectomy with the eyes that did not undergo glaucoma surgery and reported that the change in IOP is negatively correlated with refractive surprise; a correlation between lower postoperative IOP or greater IOP reduction and the amount of axial length reduction was expected [14]. In addition, a recent study has revealed that refractive outcome is inferior in combined versus subsequent trabeculectomy [15]. On the other hand, a study comparing combined trabectome-cataract surgery with cataract-alone surgery did not find any differences in refractive and visual outcomes and a retrospective analysis showed favourable refractive outcomes in patients undergoing simultaneous cataract extraction with trabeculectomy or glaucoma drainage device surgery [16, 17].

In the present analysis, we retrospectively compared the IOP, AEL, and refractive outcome of glaucoma patients undergoing phacoemulsification before trabeculectomy with patients undergoing trabeculectomy after phacoemulsification. This was done to test the hypothesis that there is a significant difference in refractive surprise in the groups, related to the changes in IOP and AEL.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects and Inclusion Criteria

The present analysis stems from retrospectively analysed data of patients that were examined at the Department of Ophthalmology, Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest. Permission by the Ethics Committee of the Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, was obtained. All subjects gave written informed consent. Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) who had undergone both trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification were included in this analysis. The diagnosis of POAG was based on glaucomatous optic neuropathy (cupping, narrowing of the neuroretinal rim mainly at the inferior and superior poles, retinal nerve fibre layer focal defects) associated with characteristic glaucomatous visual field changes. Open angle was verified with gonioscopy, and exclusion of secondary glaucoma was mandatory. All patients had undergone trabeculectomy based on their IOP values, which were not well controlled with medication. A total of 48 eyes of 48 patients were included in this analysis. Of these patients, 21 had phacoemulsification before trabeculectomy (group A) and 27 patients had trabeculectomy before phacoemulsification (group B). The minimum time span between these interventions was 6 months.

2.2. Surgical Procedures and Measurements

All subjects were operated by experienced consultant ophthalmologists at the Department of Ophthalmology, Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest. Subjects underwent trabeculectomy augmented with 5-FU standardized with a limbus-based flap at the 12 o’clock position. A precut Weck-Cel sponge was soaked in 50 mg/ml 5-FU and placed between the conjunctiva and sclera. The area was then irrigated with saline solution. A rectangular scleral flap measuring 4 × 4 mm was dissected anteriorly, and a superior iridectomy was performed. The scleral flap was closed with nylon sutures. Phacoemulsification was done in mydriasis under topical anaesthesia with oxybuprocaine 1%. The procedure included a temporal clear corneal incision and implantation of a foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens into the capsular bag. In all cases, a monofocal lens was used. Saline solution was used for irrigation, and an ophthalmic viscoelastic device was also used.

Measurements of AEL were performed using ultrasound immersion biometry (OcuScan, Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas). An automatic refractor was used to determine refraction status of the patients (Humphrey Zeiss 5015 Auto Refractor Keratometer, Carl Zeiss Meditec, California). Measurement of IOP was performed using slit lamp-mounted Goldmann applanation tonometry. All measurements were done before trabeculectomy (baseline) as well as at 6 and 12 months after trabeculectomy. The final refractive outcome was compared after both types of surgery had been completed.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± SD. In addition, % change over baseline was calculated for all outcome parameters. AEL and IOP data were analysed using a 2-way repeated measures ANOVA using absolute data. Comparison of the change in AEL and the change in IOP was done using linear correlation analysis. To avoid the use of dependent data in correlation analysis, both time points were calculated independently. Refractive outcome between the groups was compared using non-paired t-test. The refractive outcome before and after trabeculectomy in group A was compared using a paired t-test. A was considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics (StatSoft Inc., Version 6.0, Tulsa, Oklahoma).

3. Results

The demographic and clinical data of the 48 analysed subjects before any surgical intervention are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Demographic and clinical patient data.

After trabeculectomy, IOP was significantly reduced by 35.6 ± 8.2% and 35.1 ± 8.7% (Figure 1, ) at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

Figure 1: Effect of trabeculectomy on intraocular pressure (IOP) and axial eye length (AEL) in patients undergoing phacoemulsification before trabeculectomy (group A, , open up triangles) and in patients undergoing trabeculectomy before phacoemulsification (group B, , solid squares). Data are presented as means ± SD.

This reduction in IOP was not significantly different between the groups (Figure 1, ). In parallel with the decline in IOP, we observed a decrease in AEL. The decrease in AEL was 0.42 ± 0.11% at six months after surgery and 0.40 ± 0.13% after 12 months from surgery (Figure 1, ). This decrease in AEL was again comparable between the groups (Figure 1, ).

Interestingly, no correlation existed between changes in IOP and changes in AEL at either 6 or 12 months (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Correlation between changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and axial eye length (AEL). Data are separately presented for 6 months after surgery (a) and for 12 months after surgery (b). The correlation line and the 95% confidence interval are shown.

A scatterplot of refractive outcome is presented in Figure 3. Whereas spherical equivalent was only −0.05 ± 0.36 dpt in group B, it was 0.35 ± 0.75 dpt in group A. This difference between the groups was statistically significant at a level of .

Figure 3: Refractive outcome in patients undergoing phacoemulsification before trabeculectomy (group A, , open squares) and in patients undergoing trabeculectomy before phacoemulsification (group B, , solid squares). A significant difference was observed in spherical equivalent between the groups ().

In group A, trabeculectomy caused a hyperopic shift as compared to postcataract surgery values that were obtained before the filtering surgery. This hyperopic shift was 0.34 ± 0.44 dpt and was significant versus pretrabeculectomy values in group A (0.00 ± 0.58 dpt). The significance level for this effect was .

4. Discussion

It has been reported in several studies that a reduction in IOP after trabeculectomy or other surgical and pharmacological interventions is associated with a reduction in AEL [1, 2, 18, 19]. This is in good agreement with the data of the present study. On the other hand, an increase in eye length and a myopic shift was observed in the eyes with retinal detachment undergoing combined vitrectomy with cataract surgery related to the increase in IOP showing the close relation between IOP and ocular dimensions [20].

Interestingly, the association between changes in IOP and AEL in the present study was not significant. Several previous studies have quantified the change in AEL when IOP was modified. Short-term elevation in IOP in healthy subjects leads to an increase in AEL by exerting negative pressure to the globe [21]. This is in agreement with work from other authors that showed an increase in IOP by darkroom prone provocative test which is associated with eye elongation in the eyes with angle closure [22]. Kim and coworkers [19] used either pharmacological agents or laser iridotomy to reduce IOP and observed a highly significant correlation between IOP reduction and AEL decrease. Comparison was done immediately after IOP reduction to normal levels had been achieved, but the authors did not provide exact time span between the different study visits. The study is in good agreement with data from experiments in which IOP was lowered with oral acetazolamide leading to eye shortening in both healthy subjects and glaucoma patients [23]. Husain and coworkers [2] studied the relation between IOP and AEL as long as 3 years after surgery and observed that the change in IOP was associated with AEL reduction, but association was weak.

Differences in time may play a role in the association between IOP and AEL on the one hand and the relation between AEL and hyperopic shift on the other hand after IOP reduction. With regard to the former relation, the question is to which degree the change in AEL is representative for the change in intraocular volume [24, 25]. In other words, changes in the shape of the eye ball play a critical role, and it is currently unknown whether different procedures to reduce IOP may differently influence eye shape. Moreover, it needs to be considered that the relation between AEL and IOP after trabeculectomy will also be influenced by changes in choroidal thickness [9, 26]. With regard to the relation between change in AEL and hyperopic shift, anterior chamber depth, corneal diameter, lens thickness, and lens position play a role as well [27, 28]. Obviously, measurement errors in AEL could be responsible for the lack of correlation between changes in IOP and AEL in the present study. In this respect, it needs to be considered that in the most recent studies, biometry was performed based on optical low coherence interferometry, which shows better reproducibility and accuracy than immersion-type ultrasonography employed in our cohort of patients [29, 30]. Participants in the present analysis had, however, frequently very dense cataracts that omitted the use of optical technology. Alternatively, interindividual differences in tissue properties may be responsible for the lack of correlation.

The present study has clinical relevance in terms of the sequence of trabeculectomy and cataract surgery in glaucoma patients. To obtain optimal refractive outcomes, it is definitely advisable to perform trabeculectomy prior to cataract surgery. If this is not possible due to medical reasons, such as very dense cataract, the patient should be informed about the potential consequences on refractive outcomes. This may even be more critical in patients that choose for multifocal lenses although the present analysis did not include such cases.

Disclosure

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. L. F. Cashwell and C. A. Martin, “Axial length decrease accompanying successful glaucoma filtration surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 2307–2311, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. Husain, W. Li, G. Gazzard et al., “Longitudinal changes in anterior chamber depth and axial length in Asian subjects after trabeculectomy surgery,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 852–856, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Kara, O. Baz, C. Altan, B. Satana, T. Kurt, and A. Demirok, “Changes in choroidal thickness, axial length, and ocular perfusion pressure accompanying successful glaucoma filtration surgery,” Eye, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 940–945, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Y. L. Park, H. Y. Shin, K. I. Jung, and C. K. Park, “Changes in the lamina and prelamina after intraocular pressure reduction in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and acute primary angle-closure,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 233–239, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. J. Lee, T. W. Kim, and R. Weinreb, “Variation of lamina cribrosa depth following trabeculectomy,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 5392–5399, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Berisha, K. Schmetterer, C. Vass et al., “Effect of trabeculectomy on ocular blood flow,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 185–188, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. R. Lesk, A. S. Hafez, and D. Descovich, “Relationship between central corneal thickness and changes of optic nerve head topography and blood flow after intraocular pressure reduction in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 124, no. 11, pp. 1568–1572, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. Januleviciene, L. Siaudvytyte, A. Daveckaite, A. Ragauskas, B. Siesky, and A. Harris, “Reply to: 'TLP: a premature concept,” Eye, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 167-168, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Kadziauskiene, K. Kuoliene, R. Asoklis, E. Lesinskas, and L. Schmetterer, “Changes in choroidal thickness after intraocular pressure reduction following trabeculectomy,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 586–591, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Hommer, G. Fuchsjäger-Mayrl, H. Resch, C. Vass, G. Garhofer, and L. Schmetterer, “Estimation of ocular rigidity based on measurement of pulse amplitude using pneumotonometry and fundus pulse using laser interferometry in glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 4046–4050, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Berisha, O. Findl, M. Lasta, B. Kiss, and L. Schmetterer, “A study comparing ocular pressure pulse and ocular fundus pulse in dependence of axial eye length and ocular volume,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 766–772, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. C. Campbell, B. Coudrillier, and C. R. Ethier, “Biomechanics of the posterior eye: a critical role in health and disease,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 021005–021019, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. A. Girard, W. J. Dupps, M. Baskaran et al., “Translating ocular biomechanics into clinical practice: current state and future prospects,” Current Eye Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Zhang, P. L. Tsai, Y. P. Catoira-Boyle et al., “The effect of prior trabeculectomy on refractive outcomes of cataract surgery,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 858–863, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Ong, M. Nongpiur, L. Peter, and S. A. Perera, “Combined approach to phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy results in less ideal refractive outcomes compared with the sequential approach,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 873–878, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Luebke, D. Boehringer, M. Neuburger et al., “Refractive and visual outcomes after combined cataract and trabectome surgery,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 253, no. 3, pp. 419–423, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. H. Tzu, C. T. Shah, A. Galor, A. K. Junk, A. Sastry, and S. R. Wellik, “Refractive outcomes of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 161–164, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. A. Francis, M. Wang, H. Lei et al., “Changes in axial length following trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device surgery,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. S. Kim, K. N. Kim, T. S. Kang, Y. J. Jo, and J. Y. Kim, “Changes in axial length and refractive error after noninvasive normalization of intraocular pressure from elevated levels,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 163, no. e2, pp. 132–139, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. H. Cho, I. W. Park, and S. I. Kwon, “Changes in postoperative refractive outcomes following combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 158, no. 2, pp. 251–256, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Leydolt, O. Findl, and W. Drexler, “Effects of change in intraocular pressure on axial eye length and lens position,” Eye, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 657–661, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Hata and F. Hirose, “Changes in choroidal thickness and optical axial length accompanying intraocular pressure increase,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 564–568, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Ebneter, B. Wagels, and M. S. Zinkernagel, “Non-invasive biometric assessment of ocular rigidity in glaucoma patients and controls,” Eye, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 606–611, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Schmetterer, S. Dallinger, O. Findl, H. G. Eichler, and M. Wolzt, “A comparison between laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation and pneumotonometric measurement of pulsatile ocular blood flow. Baseline Considerations,” Eye, vol. 14, Part 1, pp. 39–45, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. F. Berisha, G. T. Feke, T. Hirose, J. W. McMeel, and L. R. Pasquale, “Retinal blood flow and nerve fiber layer measurements in early-stage open-angle glaucoma,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 466–472, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Chen, W. Wang, X. Gao et al., “Changes in choroidal thickness after trabeculectomy in primary angle closure glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 2608–2613, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Olsen, “Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 419–424, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. Coh, S. Moghimi, R. I. Chen et al., “Lens position parameters as predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after cataract surgery in glaucomatous versus nonglaucomatous eyes,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 2593–2599, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. O. Findl, W. Drexler, R. Menapace, H. Heinzl, C. K. Hitzenberger, and A. F. Fercher, “Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 861–867, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Olsen, “Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 472–485, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar