Journal of Ophthalmology

Journal of Ophthalmology / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 2060765 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2060765

Bart Jonckx, Michael Porcu, Aurelie Candi, Isabelle Etienne, Philippe Barbeaux, Jean H. M. Feyen, "Assessment of Ocriplasmin Effects on the Vitreoretinal Compartment in Porcine and Human Model Systems", Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2017, Article ID 2060765, 12 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2060765

Assessment of Ocriplasmin Effects on the Vitreoretinal Compartment in Porcine and Human Model Systems

Academic Editor: Taras Ardan
Received27 Apr 2017
Accepted17 Sep 2017
Published29 Oct 2017

Abstract

Ocriplasmin (Jetrea®) is a recombinant protease used to treat vitreomacular traction. To gain insight into vitreoretinal observations reported after ocriplasmin treatment, we have developed an in vivo porcine ocriplasmin-induced posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) model in which we investigated vitreoretinal tissues by optical coherence tomography, histology, and cytokine profiling. Eight weeks postinjection, ocriplasmin yielded PVD in 82% of eyes. Subretinal fluid (85%) and vitreous hyperreflective spots (45%) were resolved by week 3. Histological analysis of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as laminin, fibronectin, and collagen IV indicated no retinal ocriplasmin-induced ECM distribution changes. Retinal morphology was unaffected in all eyes. Cytokine profiles of ocriplasmin-treated eyes were not different from vehicle. In cell-based electrical resistance assays, blood-retinal barrier permeability was altered by ocriplasmin concentrations of 6 μg/mL and higher, with all effects being nontoxic, cell-type specific, and reversible. Ocriplasmin was actively taken up by RPE and Müller cells, and our data suggest both lysosomal and transcellular clearance routes for ocriplasmin. In conclusion, transient hyperreflective spots and fluid in a porcine ocriplasmin-induced PVD model did not correlate with retinal ECM rearrangement nor inflammation. Reversible in vitro effects on blood-retinal barrier permeability provide grounds for a hypothesis on the mechanisms behind transient subretinal fluid observed in ocriplasmin-treated patients.

1. Introduction

Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), the release of the vitreous cortex from the internal limiting membrane, is a normal physiologic process related to the aging eye. Incomplete PVD can lead to vitreomacular traction (VMT), which may in turn cause retinal damage and loss of visual acuity [1]. One option to treat VMT is vitrectomy surgery, in which the vitreous is removed from the eye and the traction is surgically resolved. Although effective, vitrectomy surgery is invasive and has a known risk profile with potential retinal damage and cataract formation [2, 3]. A novel nonsurgical intervention for VMT is intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin (trade name Jetrea) [4]. Ocriplasmin is a truncated form of plasmin that is administered via intravitreal injection to induce PVD. It is proposed that the PVD results from enzymatic cleavage of extracellular matrix proteins contributing to the traction, such as fibronectin and laminins at the inner limiting membrane [57]. Ocriplasmin, which was approved by the FDA in 2012 and EMA by 2013, has been shown to be efficacious for treatment of VMT with or without full-thickness macular hole (<400 μm) in several clinical studies [4, 6, 8, 9]. Appropriate patient selection, for example, absence of epiretinal membranes, results in a substantially increased efficacy [8, 1012]. The recent OASIS study evaluating the efficacy of ocriplasmin in VMT showed that 41.7% of patients achieved resolution at day 28 versus 6.2% in sham [13].

Although ocriplasmin shows promise as a less invasive alternative treatment for patients with VMT, vitreoretinal changes, such as subretinal fluid, vitreous hyperreflective spots, ellipsoid zone attenuation, and ERG profile changes, have been observed in a subset of patients [13]. Most of the retinal adverse events in human eyes have been reported to be transient or reversible over time, typically within 2 months after injection [4, 12, 1418]. Even cases of severe visual acuity impairment and visual field loss have been reported to resolve quite completely over extended periods of 4 months to 36 months [19, 20]. Recently, the 24-month, prospective, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled OASIS trial demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin, demonstrating improved resolution of symptomatic VMA compared with previous phase 3 trials with no new safety signals identified [13, 21]. Furthermore, ocriplasmin has been shown to produce clinically meaningful visual function benefits and ERG reductions were shown to correlate with superior visual improvement by the end of the study [2224].

To understand the vitreoretinal changes observed in a subset of ocriplasmin-treated eyes, further molecular and functional insight into the impact of ocriplasmin on the vitreoretinal compartment are required. Here, we report insights obtained by studying vitreoretinal tissues from an ocriplasmin-treated porcine PVD model as well as retinal cell models.

2. Methods

2.1. Pig Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) Model

All animals were housed and cared for in compliance with the FELASA guidelines and recommendations. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research at Medanex Clinic (EC MxCl-2014-028) and conformed to the ARVO statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research. Male farm pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) were anesthetized and positioned on a surgical table, and 10 mL retrobulbar anesthetic (xylazine 1%) was injected. 100 μL ocriplasmin (96 μg) or vehicle (5 mM sodium citrate in 0.9% sodium chloride, pH 3.1) was injected midvitreally. 96 μg ocriplasmin in 3.3 mL porcine vitreous corresponds to the clinical dose of 125 μg ocriplasmin administered intravitreally to 4.5 mL human vitreous. Follow-up was performed by weekly spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) using a Heidelberg Spectralis device. Two studies were performed. In the first study, 13 animals were followed up 8 weeks by OCT. Two animals were excluded from analysis due to events not related to drug administration. In the second study, 21 animals were followed by OCT and sacrificed at regular time points after injection for histology and cytokine profiling (4 animals sacrificed in week 1, 5 animals in week 2, 4 animals in week 4, and 8 animals in week 6).

2.2. Histology and Vitreous Cytokine Profiling

Eyes were fixed for 48 hours in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde solution, rinsed in PBS, and stored overnight in 3% (w/v) sucrose in PBS. Deparaffinized sections of 7 μm thickness were stained with either hematoxylin and eosin or antibodies specific for pan-laminin (NB600-680, Novus), fibronectin (ab6584, Abcam), collagen IV (1340-08, Sanbio), or Iba-1 (019-19741, Wako). Vitreous detection of CCL-2 was performed using a custom Mesoscale Discovery ELISA assay. Detection of the remaining cytokines was performed using MILLIPLEX® MAP technology (Millipore). Four untreated eyes as well as two lipopolysaccharides treated eyes (100 ng/eye) were included as controls [25]. Statistical differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.

2.3. Transepithelial/Transendothelial Electrical Resistance (TEER) Measurements

Primary human retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRMEC, Cell Systems) were cultured in EndoGRO-MV-VEGF Media (Millipore). Human retinal pigment epithelium cells (ARPE-19, ATCC) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS according to supplier instructions. In brief, cells were seeded in 24-well transparent 0.4 μm pore PET culture inserts (Greiner). Inserts were placed in the cellZscope 24-well module (NanoAnalytics) and TEER and capacitance values were recorded in one hour intervals. Once at TEER plateau, treatment in serum-free media was added to the upper transwell compartment. Following treatment, washout was performed to investigate recovery. Data were analyzed in cellZscope software and GraphPad Prism.

2.4. Alexa 488-Labeled Ocriplasmin Experiments

Ocriplasmin was fluorescently labeled using an Alexa 488 protein labeling kit (Thermo Fisher). Inactive ocriplasmin was generated either by autolysis for 24 h or by addition of the inhibitor Val-Phe-Lys. ARPE-19 cells or freshly isolated porcine Müller cells, cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS, were treated with a solution of 10 μg/mL ocriplasmin in HBSS. As vehicle, 5 mM sodium citrate in 0.9% NaCl (pH 3.1) was used. For immunofluorescence, cells were grown on 8-well-cultured slides. After treatment, cells were washed, fixed in 4% PFA, and stained with indicated antibodies: Rab7 clone D95F2, Rab11 clone D4F5 (Cell Signaling Technologies), and goat anti-rabbit Alexa 555 (Life technologies) within 48 h. Cells were imaged via epifluorescence (Zeiss Axio Imager 2) as well as confocal microscopy (Nikon C2+). For flow cytometry, cells were washed with PBS after treatment and detached with Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich). Data were acquired and analyzed on a FACSCanto (BD Biosciences) using the FACSDiva software II. Additional information can be found in supplemental methods available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2060765.

3. Results

3.1. Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) and Transient Retinal Observations in the Porcine PVD Model

In order to model ocri plasmin-induced PVD, farm pigs were injected with 96 μg ocriplasmin or vehicle (to the contralateral eye) midvitreally and followed up by OCT. In ocriplasmin-treated eyes, PVD was observed from week 2 onwards. After 8 weeks, PVD was observed in 82% (9/11) of ocriplasmin eyes, compared to 9% (1/11) of vehicle eyes (Figure 1(a), Supplemental Table ). PVD was identified on OCT images as a hyperreflective interface in the vitreous (Figures 1(b), 1(c), 1(d), and 1(e)). All PVDs observed in porcine eyes were partial. Analysis of OCT images did not reveal significant layer changes when compared to control eyes. However, subretinal fluid (SRF) was observed after ocriplasmin administration, reaching a maximum of 85% (11/13) one week after administration, which diminished to 46% (6/13) in week 2 and disappeared completely from week 3 onwards (Figures 1(a) and 2). The severity of SRF was limited with an average volume of 0.062 ± 0.012 mm3 (average ± SEM; range: 0.00085–0.149 mm3) one week after administration and diminishing thereafter (Figure 2(c)). SRF was not observed in vehicle eyes. Hyperreflective spots (HRS) in the vitreous were observed in both groups (Supplemental Figure ), reaching a maximum of 46% (6/13) in ocriplasmin-treated eyes versus 8% (1/13) in vehicle-treated eyes. All HRS were resolved by week 3. No changes were observed in the region of the ellipsoid zone.

3.2. Retinal Morphology and Extracellular Matrix Distribution in the Porcine PVD Model

In a follow-up study, farm pigs were treated and followed by OCT as described above. However, animals were sacrificed and vitreoretinal tissues were collected at specific time points up to 6-weeks postinjection. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining confirmed the presence of ocriplasmin-induced PVD as well as the absence of morphology changes in the retina and retinal layers as observed by OCT (Figure 3). We investigated the vitreoretinal distribution of laminin, fibronectin, and collagen IV, which are preferential extracellular matrix (ECM) substrates of ocriplasmin by immunohistochemistry. In line with its hypothesized mode of action, ocriplasmin-induced PVD segregated the inner limiting membrane staining into 2 layers. One layer remained attached to the retinal surface, while the other layer migrated with the PVD interface into the vitreous. In the retina itself, laminin, fibronectin, and collagen IV distribution remained localized to the blood vessels and were comparable to the vehicle at 2 or 5 weeks after ocriplasmin treatment (Figure 3).

3.3. Characterization of Inflammatory Markers in the Porcine PVD Model

Staining for Iba-1, a retinal microglia and macrophage marker, indicated an increase of Iba-1+ cells in retinas of ocriplasmin-treated eyes over vehicle eyes (Figure 4). Although a statistically significant difference in Iba1+ cells remained present at week 6 postinjection, the number of Iba1+ cells showed a downward trend over time. Compared to the level of Iba1+ cells obtained after an LPS challenge, ocriplasmin-induced changes, although significant, were minimal and close to the range of naive eyes.

In addition, we determined the levels of 14 inflammatory markers in vitreous samples originating from the PVD model: CCL-2, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1α, 1β, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and IL-1Ra (Figure 5, Supplemental Table ). Overall, vitreous levels of these cytokines remained in the range of noninjected eyes in all treatment groups except for the LPS-treated control group, where eyes showed a significant inflammatory response. No statistically significant differences were found between cytokine levels in vehicle versus ocriplasmin-treated eyes. Neither could we detect statistically significant differences between both groups when we restricted the analysis to either early (week 1 and 2) or late (week 4 and 6) time points after injection. Irrespective of treatment, we detected a modest but transient increase in several cytokines ( for IL-1Ra, IL-1β, CCL-2, IL-8, 12, 18 and GM-CSF, see Figure 5) at early postinjection time points. Also, it has to be noted that in two porcine eyes some late increases in levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, and IL-4 were observed 6 weeks after treatment with ocriplasmin. Histological analysis of these eyes did not indicate any changes in retinal morphology or Iba1+ cell count.

3.4. Ocriplasmin Effects on Cell-Based Blood-Retinal Barrier Models

To evaluate the effect of ocriplasmin on retinal barrier integrity and thus the potential of ocriplasmin to create imbalances in retinal fluid homeostasis, we measured transendothelial or transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) in monolayer cultures of human microvascular endothelial cells (HRMEC) and human retinal pigment epithelium cells (ARPE-19). TEER values reflect the integrity of tight junctions. Cell monolayers were allowed to form tight junctions and were subsequently treated with a concentration range of ocriplasmin, vehicle, or inactive (autolyzed) ocriplasmin. For HRMEC cells, ocriplasmin concentrations below 6 μg/mL had no effects on TEER. Ocriplasmin concentrations of 6 and 12 μg/mL decreased TEER values in a concentration dependent manner (Figure 6). This effect was reversible, with TEER recovering back to vehicle level within 36 hours. Next, we assessed the effect of ocriplasmin on ARPE-19 monolayers. In contrast to endothelial monolayers, ocriplasmin treatment of RPE cells yielded a small increase in TEER (Figure 6). This increase was transient or reversible after treatment washout. In both cell types, inactive ocriplasmin did not affect TEER. No observations were made indicating cell toxicity, such as increases in the capacitance profiles due to changes in cellular adherence or cell death (data not shown).

3.5. Retinal Cells Internalize Ocriplasmin in Active Transport Organelles

We investigated whether retinal cells could participate in the uptake and clearance of ocriplasmin. Human retinal pigment epithelium cells (ARPE19) and primary porcine Müller cells were treated with Alexa 488 fluorescently labeled ocriplasmin, and localization was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy. Thirty minutes after treatment, microscopy indicated the presence of labeled ocriplasmin inside both cultured Müller and RPE cells (Figure 7(a)). Interestingly, A488-ocriplasmin signal was present in foci, which were not detected after treatment with label alone or inactive ocriplasmin. Indeed, flow cytometry data confirmed that enzymatically inactive forms of ocriplasmin were taken up at a much slower rate than the active form (Figure 7(b)). The focal intracellular distribution of labeled ocriplasmin suggested that it could be incorporated into vesicles. Using confocal microscopy, we investigated whether ocriplasmin was present in endosomes. In both Müller and RPE cells, a portion of ocriplasmin foci was found to colocalize with Rab7 positive late endosomes, which are committed to become lysosomes. In contrast, in RPE cells, we could also detect ocriplasmin in Rab11 positive endosomes, which recycle to the plasma membrane (Figure 7(c)).

4. Discussion

In order to better understand some of the transient vitreoretinal observations made in a subset of ocriplasmin-treated patients, we developed and analyzed vitreoretinal tissues from a porcine ocriplasmin-induced posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) model. We chose the porcine eye as it is a highly relevant and suitable model to investigate human eye diseases such as glaucoma [26], proliferative vitreoretinopathy [27, 28], and retinitis pigmentosa [29, 30]. The porcine eye and retina share many similarities with that of the human eye [3136], resembling the human retina in number and distribution of rods and cones, shape, vasculature, and function [3742]. Porcine vitreous is similar to human vitreous in terms of volume and biochemical composition [43]. Additionally, the porcine eye is an attractive nonprimate model for exploring preclinical efficacy and safety of novel surgical and pharmaceutical therapies [4446]. The mode of delivery of ocriplasmin in the pig’s eye is highly comparable to intravitreal injection in the human eye; midvitreal placement of the injection yields similar distances to the retina and lens, in contrast to other species such as the monkey or rodent.

When injected with ocriplasmin at a similar concentration and injection volume compared to human, ocriplasmin-induced PVD in the porcine model occurs from week 2 postinjection onward. At 8-weeks postinjection, PVD was observed in 82% of ocriplasmin-treated pigs as compared to 9% of vehicle-treated eyes. Further investigation of vitreoretinal morphology by OCT indicated no changes in retinal morphology during the 8-weeks postinjection follow-up period but did indicate the occurrence of transient vitreoretinal effects, such as vitreal hyperreflective spots and subretinal fluid after ocriplasmin treatment. These changes occurred rapidly after injection (peak incidence at week 1) and were transient in nature, resolving by week 3. These observations correlate with observations made in patients and provided the opportunity to study the underlying biological processes more in detail. Ellipsoid zone changes, on the other hand, were not observed in the pig model. It remains unclear if this is a limitation of the model due to the species differences. In this respect, it should be noted that the ellipsoid zone is less distinct in the pig compared to human.

It has been hypothesized that transient retinal observations induced by ocriplasmin are the result of partial or total removal of ECM inside the retina due to enzymatic cleavage [47]. Our results indicate that treatment with 29 μg/mL ocriplasmin (96 μg/eye, pig vitreous volume = 3.3 mL [48]) has no clear impact on the retinal staining of both laminin, fibronectin, and collagen IV, except locally at the inner limiting membrane, in agreement with the proposed mechanism of action of ocriplasmin. In knockout models of ECM such as laminin β2 and γ3, retinal and ERG changes have been observed [49, 50]. As we observe the largely unchanged retinal distribution of ECM proteins, we hypothesize that it is unlikely that ocriplasmin induces such an exaggerated pharmacological response as observed in conditions of total ECM protein deficiency. In addition, retinal cell types such as endothelial cells, Müller cells, and retinal pigment epithelium cells have been described to produce these proteins, thereby regenerating the ECM [5153].

The transient occurrence of SRF in the porcine PVD model was restricted to ocriplasmin-treated eyes, and transient vitreous HRS occurred more frequently in ocriplasmin-treated eyes. By examining vitreoretinal tissues from our porcine PVD model, we investigated if these observations resulted from an acute inflammatory response. While histological analysis of the porcine retinas used in our study did indicate a minor increase of Iba1-positive cells in ocriplasmin-treated eyes, levels remain in the range of healthy eyes [54]. Additionally, cytokine profiling indicated no significant difference between vehicle- and ocriplasmin-treated eyes. A minor and transient inflammatory response was observed in all eyes postinjection, irrespective of treatment and indicative of an effect related to the injection procedure. Finally, for a number of cytokines, levels increased at late time points in 2 ocriplasmin-treated eyes but were not correlated to morphological changes. These results indicate that ocriplasmin-induced PVD, SRF, and HRS do not appear to correlate with inflammatory pathways.

An alternative potential mechanism underlying the emergence of SRF is that ocriplasmin could affect retinal fluid homeostasis. Investigation in in vitro models of the inner (HRMEC) and outer (ARPE-19) blood-retinal barrier indicated that ocriplasmin could modulate barrier permeability in a cell- and concentration-specific manner. All effects were reversible and no signs of cellular toxicity were observed. In HRMEC, concentrations starting at 6 μg/mL ocriplasmin reduced monolayer TEER, whereas lower concentrations had no effect. In contrast, ocriplasmin slightly increased TEER of RPE monolayers. Our observations of ocriplasmin-induced TEER increase seem remarkable but have been reported previously for other proteases [55, 56]. Unfortunately, no good hypotheses exist on the in vivo relevance of this mechanism, but such imbalance could result in fluid accumulation. The RPE is known to keep the subretinal space “dry” by maintaining appropriate fluid homeostasis [57, 58]. It remains to be confirmed whether the observed in vitro TEER changes are physiologically significant, since ocriplasmin is rapidly inactivated after injection due to autolysis and endogenous circulating inhibitors, making the local concentration of proteolytically active ocriplasmin difficult to estimate. Furthermore, alternative mechanisms could lead to SRF accumulation in vivo. As a result of its proteolytic activity, ocriplasmin could, for instance, induce accumulation of proteins or protein fragments that increase the osmotic pressure at the subretinal space, hereby favoring water retention in the subretinal space [57]. Finally, it cannot be excluded that part of the mode of action is mediated by proteases operating downstream of ocriplasmin (e.g., MMPs) [59]. Further experiments are required to investigate the contribution of these pathways to fluid homeostasis.

Finally, retinal cells, such as Müller glia and retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) cells have been shown to participate in retinal uptake, transport and clearance of proteins, and intravitreally administered therapeutics, such as anti-VEGFs [6063]. We have investigated whether this could also be the case for ocriplasmin. Our data indicate that both Müller and RPE cells internalize ocriplasmin, and at least a part of ocriplasmin seems to be internalized via active endocytosis. Although the specific uptake pathway remains unclear, the different uptake dynamics of active versus inactive ocriplasmin uptake does indicate a mechanism dependent on the enzymatic activity. The presence of ocriplasmin in Rab7 positive endosomes suggests that Müller and RPE cells are involved in clearance of ocriplasmin by directing at least part of internalized ocriplasmin to a lysosomal degradation fate [64]. In RPE cells specifically, ocriplasmin signal is also present in Rab11 positive recycling endosomes. Although we did not evaluate the directionality of ocriplasmin transport, RPE-mediated directional transport of therapeutic antibodies, such as anti-VEGFs, towards the choroid has been described, suggesting an additional route of ocriplasmin clearance from the eye [61, 63]. More study is required to evaluate whether internalized ocriplasmin maintains proteolytic activity as well as to elucidate the fate of ocriplasmin after intravitreal injection in ex vivo or in vivo models, where the complex architecture and polarization of the retina are maintained.

Overall, we have described a novel porcine model for induction of posterior vitreous detachment and demonstrated that ocriplasmin is able to induce PVD in this model. As transient hyperreflective spots and fluid were observed in this model, we further examined vitreoretinal tissues to elucidate the underlying mechanism. We did not observe significant retinal extracellular matrix rearrangement or acute inflammation after injection of ocriplasmin, but further cell-based experiments did indicate a potential transient and nontoxic effect on blood-retinal permeability. Further, in vivo studies would need to be performed to ascertain whether SRF correlates with ocriplasmin-induced effects on the blood-retinal barrier.

Abbreviations

BRB:Blood-retinal barrier
ECM:Extracellular matrix
ERG:Electroretinogram
HRS:Hyperreflective spots
HRMEC:Human retinal microvascular endothelial cells
IVT:Intravitreal
OCT:Optical coherence tomography
PVD:Posterior vitreous detachment
RPE:Retinal pigmented epithelium
SRF:Subretinal fluid
TEER:Transepithelial or transendothelial electrical resistance
VMA/VMT:Vitreomacular adhesion/Vitreomacular traction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Bart Jonckx, Michael Porcu, Aurelie Candi, Philippe Barbeaux, and Jean HM Feyen participated in the research design. Bart Jonckx, Michael Porcu, Aurelie Candi, and Isabelle Etienne conducted the experiments. Bart Jonckx, Michael Porcu, and Aurelie Candi contributed new reagents or analytic tools and performed data analysis. Bart Jonckx, Michael Porcu, Philippe Barbeaux, and Jean HM Feyen wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Bart Jonckx and Michael Porcu contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marianne Eelen, Anne Verborg, and Tom Janssen for their technical support. This work was supported by Grant 140868 from the Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT) in Flanders, Belgium.

Supplementary Materials

The information of supplementary materials are as follows: Supplementary Material and Methods. Supplementary materials and methods descriptions. Table S1. Overview of individual animal observations of the porcine PVD experiment treated with 96μg ocriplasmin as presented in Figure 1. Table S2. Individual data of cytokine concentrations and associated statistics as presented in Figure 5. Figure S1. Representative OCT image illustrating the presence of Hyper-reflective spots (HRS) in the vitreous. Figure S2. Detailed and separate fluorescence channel assessment of co-localization of Alexa-488 ocriplasmin with endosomal transport vehicles by confocal microscopy as presented in Figure 7.

  1. Supplementary Material
  2. Supplementary Material
  3. Supplementary Material
  4. Supplementary Material
  5. Supplementary Material

References

  1. J. S. Duker, P. K. Kaiser, S. Binder et al., “The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 12, pp. 2611–2619, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. L. Jackson, E. Nicod, A. Angelis et al., “Pars plana vitrectomy for vitreomacular traction syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis of safety and efficacy,” Retina, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 2012–2017, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. D. Stein, D. N. Zacks, D. Grossman, H. Grabe, M. W. Johnson, and F. A. Sloan, “Adverse events after pars plana vitrectomy among Medicare beneficiaries,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 1656–1663, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. Stalmans, M. S. Benz, A. Gandorfer et al., “Enzymatic vitreolysis with ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular holes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, no. 7, pp. 606–615, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. Chen, W. Mo, K. Sun, X. Huang, Y. L. Zhang, and H. Y. Song, “Microplasmin degrades fibronectin and laminin at vitreoretinal interface and outer retina during enzymatic vitrectomy,” Current Eye Research, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1057–1064, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. D. de Smet, C. Valmaggia, J. Zarranz-Ventura, and B. Willekens, “Microplasmin: ex vivo characterization of its activity in porcine vitreous,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 814–819, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Gandorfer, M. Rohleder, C. Sethi et al., “Posterior vitreous detachment induced by microplasmin,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 641–647, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. S. Benz, K. H. Packo, V. Gonzalez et al., “A placebo-controlled trial of microplasmin intravitreous injection to facilitate posterior vitreous detachment before vitrectomy,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 791–797, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Stalmans, C. Delaey, M. D. de Smet, E. van Dijkman, and S. Pakola, “Intravitreal injection of microplasmin for treatment of vitreomacular adhesion: results of a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled phase II trial (the MIVI-IIT trial),” Retina, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1122–1127, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Willekens, P. L. Abegao, E. Vandewalle, I. Stalmans, and P. Stalmans, “Improved efficacy of ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction release and transient changes in optic disk morphology,” Retina, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1135–1143, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. P. Singh, A. Li, R. Bedi et al., “Anatomical and visual outcomes following ocriplasmin treatment for symptomatic vitreomacular traction syndrome,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 356–360, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. A. Haller, P. Stalmans, M. S. Benz et al., “Efficacy of intravitreal ocriplasmin for treatment of vitreomacular adhesion: subgroup analyses from two randomized trials,” Ophthalmology, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 117–122, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. P. U. Dugel, M. J. Tolentino, L. Feiner, P. Kozma, and A. Leroy, “Results of the 2-Year Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole (OASIS) Randomized Trial,” Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 2232–2247, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. K. Kaiser, A. Kampik, B. D. Kuppermann, A. Girach, S. Rizzo, and R. C. Sergott, “Safety profile of ocriplasmin for the pharmacologic treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/traction,” Retina, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1111–1127, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Itoh, P. K. Kaiser, R. P. Singh, S. K. Srivastava, and J. P. Ehlers, “Assessment of retinal alterations after intravitreal ocriplasmin with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 12, pp. 2506–2507.e2, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. J. Warrow, M. M. Lai, A. Patel, J. Raevis, and D. M. Berinstein, “Treatment outcomes and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings of eyes with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion treated with intravitreal ocriplasmin,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 20–30.e1, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Quezada-Ruiz, D. J. Pieramici, M. Nasir et al., “Outer retina reflectivity changes on SD-OCT after intravitreal ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular hole,” Retina, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1144–1150, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. L. Tyler, M. Singer, and D. Bell, “Long-term outcomes in patients with vitreomacular traction treated with a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin,” Retinal Cases & Brief Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. C. Quezada, D. J. Pieramici, M. Nasir, M. Rabena, and R. L. Avery, “Severe acute vision loss, dyschromatopsia, and changes in the ellipsoid zone on SD-OCT associated with intravitreal ocriplasmin injection,” Retinal Cases & Brief Reports, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 145–148, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Thanos, J. Hernandez-Siman, K. V. Marra, and J. G. Arroyo, “Reversible vision loss and outer retinal abnormalities after intravitreal ocriplasmin injection,” Retinal Cases & Brief Reports, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 330–332, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. G. Birch, M. S. Benz, D. M. Miller et al., “Evaluation of full-field electroretinogram reductions after ocriplasmin treatment: Results of the OASIS Trial ERG Substudy,” OASIS: Sub-Study Evaluation of Full-Field Electroretinogram in Patients with Ocripolsmin Vs Sham, AAO Las Vegas, 2017, abstract PA091 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. Varma, J. A. Haller, and P. K. Kaiser, “Improvement in patient-reported visual function after ocriplasmin for vitreomacular adhesion: results of the microplasmin for intravitreous injection-traction release without surgical treatment (MIVI-TRUST) trials,” JAMA Ophthalmology, vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 997–1004, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. L. Jackson, T. Verstraeten, L. Duchateau, and B. Lescrauwaet, “Visual function response to ocriplasmin for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and macular hole,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. G. Birch, M. S. Benz, D. M. Miller et al., “Evaluation of full-field electroretinogram reductions after ocriplasmin treatment: results of the OASIS trial ERG substudy,” Retina, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. C. Gilger, E. M. Abarca, J. H. Salmon, and S. Patel, “Treatment of acute posterior uveitis in a porcine model by injection of triamcinolone acetonide into the suprachoroidal space using microneedles,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2483–2492, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. V. Kyhn, K. Warfvinge, E. Scherfig et al., “Acute retinal ischemia caused by controlled low ocular perfusion pressure in a porcine model. Electrophysiological and histological characterisation,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 1100–1106, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Scholda, R. Biowski, C. Simader, W. Hauff, S. Kaminski, and A. Lakits, “A new sponge profile for retinal detachment surgery: design and in vitro-effectiveness,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 700–703, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Garcia-Layana, J. C. Pastor, M. A. Saornil, and G. Gonzalez, “Porcine model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy with platelets,” Current Eye Research, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 556–563, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Z. Y. Li, F. Wong, J. H. Chang et al., “Rhodopsin transgenic pigs as a model for human retinitis pigmentosa,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 808–819, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  30. J. W. Ross, J. P. Fernandez de Castro, J. Zhao et al., “Generation of an inbred miniature pig model of retinitis pigmentosa,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 501–507, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. L. Beauchemin, “The fine structure of the pig’s retina,” Albrecht Von Graefes Archive Klinische Experimentelle Ophthalmologie, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 27–45, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. Peichl, H. Ott, and B. B. Boycott, “Alpha ganglion cells in mammalian retinae,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 231, no. 1263, pp. 169–197, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. L. De, H. Lauwers, P. Simoens, and J. P. De Geest, “Development of the retina in the porcine fetus. A light microscopic study,” Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia: Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series C, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 222–235, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Garca, J. Ruiz-Ederra, H. Hernandez-Barbachano, and E. Vecino, “Topography of pig retinal ganglion cells,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 486, no. 4, pp. 361–372, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Ruiz-Ederra, M. Garcia, D. Hicks, and E. Vecino, “Comparative study of the three neurofilament subunits within pig and human retinal ganglion cells,” Molecular Vision, vol. 10, pp. 83–92, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. Ruiz-Ederra, P. F. Hitchcock, and E. Vecino, “Two classes of astrocytes in the adult human and pig retina in terms of their expression of high affinity NGF receptor (TrkA),” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 337, no. 3, pp. 127–130, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Hendrickson and D. Hicks, “Distribution and density of medium- and short-wavelength selective cones in the domestic pig retina,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 435–444, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. T. H. Mahmoud, M. C. BW 2nd, Y. Hao et al., “Lensectomy and vitrectomy decrease the rate of photoreceptor loss in rhodopsin P347L transgenic pigs,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 241, no. 4, pp. 298–308, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. Warfvinge, J. F. Kiilgaard, E. B. Lavik et al., “Retinal progenitor cell xenografts to the pig retina: morphologic integration and cytochemical differentiation,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 1385–1393, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. I. Iandiev, O. Uckermann, T. Pannicke et al., “Glial cell reactivity in a porcine model of retinal detachment,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 2161–2171, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. R. Lalonde, B. C. Chauhan, and F. Tremblay, “Retinal ganglion cell activity from the multifocal electroretinogram in pig: optic nerve section, anaesthesia and intravitreal tetrodotoxin,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 570, no. 2, pp. 325–338, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. N. Lassota, J. F. Kiilgaard, J. U. Prause, and la CM., “Correlation between clinical and histological features in a pig model of choroidal neovascularization,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 244, no. 3, pp. 394–398, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Sebag, “Molecular biology of pharmacologic vitreolysis,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 103, pp. 473–494, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  44. T. Laube, C. Brockmann, G. Roessler et al., “Development of surgical techniques for implantation of a wireless intraocular epiretinal retina implant in Göttingen minipigs,” Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 250, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. E. A. Atzpodien, B. Jacobsen, J. Funk et al., “Advanced clinical imaging and tissue-based biomarkers of the eye for toxicology studies in minipigs,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 398–413, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Veurink, G. Mangioris, B. Kaufmann et al., “Development of an intravitreal peptide (BQ123) sustained release system based on poly(2-hydroxyoctanoic acid) aiming at a retinal vasodilator response,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 517–523, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. T. Fahim, N. W. Khan, and M. W. Johnson, “Acute panretinal structural and functional abnormalities after intravitreous ocriplasmin injection,” JAMA Ophthalmology, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 484–486, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Vezina, “Comparative ocular anatomy in commonly used laboratory animals,” in Assessing Ocular Toxicology in Laboratory Animals, A. B. Weir and M. Collins, Eds., pp. 1–23, Humana Press, New York, London, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. G. Pinzon-Duarte, G. Daly, Y. N. Li, M. Koch, and W. J. Brunken, “Defective formation of the inner limiting membrane in laminin β2- and γ3-null mice produces retinal dysplasia,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1773–1782, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. R. T. Libby, C. R. Lavallee, G. W. Balkema, W. J. Brunken, and D. D. Hunter, “Disruption of laminin β2 chain production causes alterations in morphology and function in the CNS,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 21, pp. 9399–9411, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  51. S. Aisenbrey, M. Zhang, D. Bacher, J. Yee, W. J. Brunken, and D. D. Hunter, “Retinal pigment epithelial cells synthesize laminins, including laminin 5, and adhere to them through α3- and α6-containing integrins,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 5537–5544, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. T. Libby, M. F. Champliaud, T. Claudepierre et al., “Laminin expression in adult and developing retinae: evidence of two novel CNS laminins,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 6517–6528, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  53. L. J. Mandarino, N. Sundarraj, J. Finlayson, and H. R. Hassell, “Regulation of fibronectin and laminin synthesis by retinal capillary endothelial cells and pericytes in vitro,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 609–621, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. P. Yang, L. Chen, R. Zwart, and A. Kijlstra, “Immune cells in the porcine retina: distribution, characterization and morphological features,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1488–1492, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  55. E. Cohen, A. Talmon, O. Faff, A. Bacher, and Y. Ben-Shaul, “Formation of tight junctions in epithelial cells. I. Induction by proteases in a human colon carcinoma cell line,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 103–116, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  56. V. A. Swystun, B. Renaux, F. Moreau et al., “Serine proteases decrease intestinal epithelial ion permeability by activation of protein kinase Cζ,” American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 297, no. 1, pp. G60–G70, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Scholl, J. Kirchhof, and A. J. Augustin, “Pathophysiology of macular edema,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 224, Supplement 1, pp. 8–15, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. R. Simo, M. Garcia-Ramirez, M. Higuera, and C. Hernandez, “Apolipoprotein A1 is overexpressed in the retina of diabetic patients,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 319–325.e1, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. X. Che, X. Q. Fan, and Z. L. Wang, “Mechanism of blood-retinal barrier breakdown induced by HIV-1 (review),” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 768–772, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. H. Aboul Naga, M. Dithmer, G. Chitadze et al., “Intracellular pathways following uptake of bevacizumab in RPE cells,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 131, pp. 29–41, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. P. Heiduschka, H. Fietz, S. Hofmeister et al., “Penetration of bevacizumab through the retina after intravitreal injection in the monkey,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2814–2823, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. N. Reid and D. B. Farber, “Glial transcytosis of a photoreceptor-secreted signaling protein, retinoschisin,” Glia, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 397–406, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. H. Terasaki, T. Sakamoto, M. Shirasawa et al., “Penetration of bevacizumab and ranibizumab through retinal pigment epithelial layer in vitro,” Retina, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1007–1015, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Wieffer, T. Maritzen, and V. Haucke, “SnapShot: endocytic trafficking,” Cell, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 382.e1–382.e3, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Bart Jonckx et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1038
Downloads518
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.