Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2149145, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2149145
Research Article

Corneal Topographic and Aberrometric Measurements Obtained with a Multidiagnostic Device in Healthy Eyes: Intrasession Repeatability

1Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
2Optometry Clinic, Prevention Service of the University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to David P. Piñero

Received 1 September 2016; Revised 10 November 2016; Accepted 5 December 2016; Published 4 January 2017

Academic Editor: Marco Lombardo

Copyright © 2017 David P. Piñero et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. P. Piñero, “Technologies for anatomical and geometric characterization of the corneal structure and anterior segment: a review,” Seminars in Ophthalmology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 161–170, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Cerviño, A. Dominguez-Vicent, T. Ferrer-Blasco, S. García-Lázaro, and C. Albarrán-Diego, “Intrasubject repeatability of corneal power, thickness, and wavefront aberrations with a new version of a dual rotating Scheimpflug-Placido system,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 186–192, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. C. Hernández-Camarena, P. Chirinos-Saldaña, A. Navas et al., “Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement between three different scheimpflug systems in measuring corneal and anterior segment biometry,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 616–621, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Shetty, V. Arora, C. Jayadev et al., “Repeatability and agreement of three Scheimpflug-based imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in keratoconus,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 5263–5268, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Montalbán, J. L. Alió, J. Javaloy, and D. P. Piñero, “Intrasubject repeatability in keratoconus-eye measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Montalbán, D. P. Piñero, J. Javaloy, and J. L. Alió, “Intrasubject repeatability of corneal morphology measurements obtained with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 971–977, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. J. Kim, I. Montes de Oca, L. Wang, M. P. Weikert, D. D. Koch, and S. S. Khandelwal, “Repeatability of posterior and total corneal curvature measurements with a dual Scheimpflug–Placido tomographer,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2731–2738, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Güler, R. Yağci, M. Akyol, Z. Arslanyılmaz, M. Balci, and I. F. Hepşen, “Repeatability and reproducibility of Galilei measurements in normal keratoconic and postrefractive corneas,” Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 331–336, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. C. Lopez de la Fuente, A. Sanchez-Cano, F. Segura, L. Fuentes-Broto, and I. Pinilla, “Repeatability of ocular measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy eyes,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 808646, 6 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Aramberri, L. Araiz, A. Garcia et al., “Dual versus single Scheimpflug camera for anterior segment analysis: precision and agreement,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1934–1949, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. Q. Wang, G. Savini, K. J. Hoffer et al., “A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e45607, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C. McAlinden, J. Khadka, and K. Pesudovs, “A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the oculus pentacam HR,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 7731–7737, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Wang, M. Shirayama, and D. D. Koch, “Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug Placido corneal topographer,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 425–430, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. T. Kawamorita, N. Nakayama, and H. Uozato, “Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and Keratron topography systems,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 25, pp. 539–544, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Masoud, E. Livny, and I. Bahar, “Repeatability and intrasession reproducibility obtained by the Sirius anterior segment analysis system,” Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 107–110, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. I. R. Hidalgo, J. J. Rozema, S. N. Dhubhghaill, N. Zakaria, C. Koppen, and M. J. Tassignon, “Repeatability and inter-device agreement for three different methods of keratometry: Placido, Scheimpflug, and color LED corneal topography,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 176–181, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Fityo, J. Bühren, M. Shajari, and T. Kohnen, “Keratometry versus total corneal refractive power: analysis of measurement repeatability with 5 different devices in normal eyes with low astigmatism,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 569–576, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. G. Savini, P. Barboni, M. Carbonelli, and K. J. Hoffer, “Repeatability of automatic measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido topography,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1809–1816, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. A. Bayhan, S. Aslan Bayhan, E. Muhafiz, and I. Can, “Repeatability of aberrometric measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using a new Scheimpflug-Placido topographer,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 269–275, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. P. Piñero, J. T. Juan, and J. L. Alió, “Intrasubject repeatability of internal aberrometry obtained with a new integrated aberrometer,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 509–517, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus