Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2190347, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2190347
Research Article

Steeper Iris Conicity Is Related to a Shallower Anterior Chamber: The Gutenberg Health Study

1Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
2Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
3Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
4DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany
5Department of Biomedical Statistics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
6Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
7Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
8Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Alexander K. Schuster

Received 2 April 2017; Revised 14 June 2017; Accepted 16 July 2017; Published 11 September 2017

Academic Editor: Alejandro Cerviño

Copyright © 2017 Alexander K. Schuster et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Aung, W. P. Nolan, D. Machin et al., “Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 123, pp. 527–532, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. G. Campbell and R. M. Schertzer, “Pathophysiology of pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 6, pp. 96–101, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. M. Liebmann, C. Tello, S. J. Chew, H. Cohen, and R. Ritch, “Prevention of blinking alters iris configuration in pigment dispersion syndrome and in normal eyes,” Ophthalmology, vol. 102, pp. 446–455, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. J. Pavlin, K. Harasiewicz, and F. S. Foster, “An ultrasound biomicroscopic dark-room provocative test,” Ophthalmic Surgery, vol. 26, pp. 253–255, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  5. L. Liu, E. L. Ong, and J. Crowston, “The concave iris in pigment dispersion syndrome,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, pp. 66–70, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. K. Schuster, J. E. Fischer, and U. Vossmerbaeumer, “Curvature of iris profile in spectral domain optical coherence tomography and dependency to refraction, age and pupil size - the MIPH Eye&Health Study,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 95, pp. 175–181, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Nonaka, T. Iwawaki, M. Kikuchi, M. Fujihara, A. Nishida, and Y. Kurimoto, “Quantitative evaluation of iris convexity in primary angle closure,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 143, pp. 695–697, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. N. Kanadani, S. Dorairaj, A. M. Langlieb et al., “Ultrasound biomicroscopy in asymmetric pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 124, pp. 1573–1576, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Aptel, S. Beccat, V. Fortoul, and P. Denis, “Biometric analysis of pigment dispersion syndrome using anterior segment optical coherence tomography,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, pp. 1563–1570, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Asrani, M. Sarunic, C. Santiago, and J. Izatt, “Detailed visualization of the anterior segment using fourier-domain optical coherence tomography,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, pp. 765–771, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Azuara-Blanco, J. Burr, C. Ramsay et al., “Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial,” Lancet, vol. 388, pp. 1389–1397, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Siak, D. Quek, M. E. Nongpiur et al., “Anterior chamber angle and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification: a comparison between eyes with closed-angle and open-angle glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 25, pp. e259–e264, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Hohn, U. Kottler, T. Peto et al., “The ophthalmic branch of the Gutenberg health study: study design, cohort profile and self-reported diseases,” PLoS One, vol. 10, article e0120476, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Barkana, I. Dekel, Y. Goldich, Y. Morad, I. Avni, and D. Zadok, “Angle closure in Caucasians—a pilot, general ophthalmology clinic-based study,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 21, pp. 337–341, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Y. Kim, J. H. Lee, M. D. Ahn, C. Y. Kim, Namil Study Group, and Korean Glaucoma Society, “Angle closure in the Namil study in Central South Korea,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 130, pp. 1177–1183, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Senthil, C. Garudadri, R. C. Khanna, and K. Sannapaneni, “Angle closure in the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 117, pp. 1729–1735, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. H. van Romunde, G. Thepass, and H. G. Lemij, “Is hyperopia an important risk factor for PACG in the Dutch population?-a case control study,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2013, Article ID 630481, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Vijaya, R. George, H. Arvind et al., “Prevalence of angle-closure disease in a rural southern Indian population,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 124, pp. 403–409, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. K. Schuster, N. Pfeiffer, S. Nickels et al., “Distribution of anterior chamber angle width and correlation with age, refraction, and anterior chamber depth-the Gutenberg health study,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 57, pp. 3740–3746, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Hashemi, M. Khabazkhoob, S. Mohazzab-Torabi et al., “Anterior chamber angle and anterior chamber volume in a 40- to 64-year-old population,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 42, pp. 244–249, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. I. Fernandez-Vigo, J. A. Fernandez-Vigo, A. Macarro-Merino, C. Fernández-Pérez, J. M. Martínez-de-la-Casa, and J. García-Feijoó, “Determinants of anterior chamber depth in a large Caucasian population and agreement between intra-ocular lens Master and Pentacam measurements of this variable,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 94, pp. e150–e155, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Yazdani, S. Akbarian, M. Pakravan, A. Doozandeh, and M. Afrouzifar, “Biometric parameters in different stages of primary angle closure using low-coherence interferometry,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 92, pp. 343–349, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. F. Lowe, “Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, pp. 161–169, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. L. Xu, W. F. Cao, Y. X. Wang, C. X. Chen, and J. B. Jonas, “Anterior chamber depth and chamber angle and their associations with ocular and general parameters: the Beijing eye study,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 145, pp. 929–936, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. S. Adam, C. J. Pavlin, and L. J. Ulanski, “Ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of iris profile changes with accommodation in pigmentary glaucoma and relationship to age,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 138, pp. 652–654, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Dorairaj, C. Oliveira, A. K. Fose et al., “Accommodation-induced changes in iris curvature,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 86, pp. 220–225, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. J. Pavlin, K. Harasiewicz, and F. S. Foster, “Posterior iris bowing in pigmentary dispersion syndrome caused by accommodation,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 118, pp. 114–116, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. M. O. Balidis, C. Bunce, C. J. Sandy, R. P. Wormald, and M. H. Miller, “Iris configuration in accommodation in pigment dispersion syndrome,” Eye, vol. 16, pp. 694–700, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. K. Jensen, O. Nissen, and S. V. Kessing, “Exercise and reversed pupillary block in pigmentary glaucoma,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 120, pp. 110–112, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. B. Haargaard, P. K. Jensen, S. V. Kessing, and O. I. Nissen, “Exercise and iris concavity in healthy eyes,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 79, pp. 277–282, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. Y. Cheung, S. Liu, R. N. Weinreb et al., “Dynamic analysis of iris configuration with anterior segment optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, pp. 4040–4046, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Tomidokoro, M. Araie, and A. Iwase, “Corneal thickness and relating factors in a population-based study in Japan: the Tajimi study,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 144, pp. 152–154, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Eysteinsson, F. Jonasson, H. Sasaki et al., “Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik eye study,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 80, pp. 11–15, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. M. Hoffmann, J. Lamparter, A. Mirshahi et al., “Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with ocular parameters in a large central European cohort: the Gutenberg health study,” PLoS One, vol. 8, article e66158, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. W. Pan, T. Y. Wong, L. Chang et al., “Ocular biometry in an urban Indian population: the Singapore Indian eye study (SINDI),” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, pp. 6636–6642, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. S. Lim, S. M. Saw, V. S. Jeganathan et al., “Distribution and determinants of ocular biometric parameters in an Asian population: the Singapore Malay eye study,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, pp. 103–109, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. T. Fu, Y. W. Song, Z. Q. Chen et al., “Ocular biometry in the adult population in rural central China: a population-based, cross-sectional study,” International Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 8, pp. 812–817, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. B. Jonas, R. Iribarren, V. Nangia et al., “Lens position and age: the Central India eye and medical study,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 56, pp. 5309–5314, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. B. Jonas, V. Nangia, R. Gupta, A. Sinha, and K. Bhate, “Lens thickness and associated factors,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 40, pp. 583–590, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Warrier, H. M. Wu, H. S. Newland et al., “Ocular biometry and determinants of refractive error in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila eye study,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 92, pp. 1591–1594, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. Hoehn, A. Mirshahi, E. M. Hoffmann et al., “Distribution of intraocular pressure and its association with ocular features and cardiovascular risk factors: the Gutenberg health study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, pp. 961–968, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus