Research Article
Effect of Mitomycin C on Myopic versus Astigmatic Photorefractive Keratectomy
Table 2
A 1-year postoperative comparison between the MMC and non-MMC groups.
| | With MMC | value | Without MMC | value | Simple myopia | Astigmatism | Simple myopia | Astigmatism |
| UCVA | 0 ± 0 | 0.036 ± 0.137 | | 0.1 ± 0.141 | 0 ± 0 | | BCVA | 0 ± 0 | 0.036 ± 0.137 | | 0.05 ± 0.070 | 0 ± 0 | | Refractive error | 0 ± 0 | 0.004 ± 0.102 | | −0.028 ± 0.08 | −0.016 ± 0.056 | | K-reading | 39.23 ± 2.1 | 39.33 ± 1.7 | | 40.58 ± 1.230 | 40.98 ± 1.355 | | Haze formation | 0 | 0 | No difference | 0.14 ± 0.287 | 0.31 ± 0.32 | |
|
|
BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; K-reading: keratometry reading; MMC: mitomycin C; UCVA: uncorrected visual acuity.
|