Review Article

A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia

Table 3

Pooled estimates of all studies comparing other positions in the amblyopic eye with the fellow and normal eyes.

GroupPosition/nWMD (random) (95% CI) valueTest for heterogeneityEgger’s test ()Begg’s test ()

A versus FT 0.5 mm/240.14 (15.00–65.27), 0.317
N 0.5 mm/246.38 (20.35–72.42), 0.317
T 1.0 mm/620.83 (11.01–30.64), 0.2890.188
N 1.0 mm/636.95 (20.52–53.38), 0.0200.851
S 1.0 mm/231.66 (12.50–50.83), 0.317
I 1.0 mm/231.34 (13.92–48.76), 0.317
T 2.0 mm/27.71 (−43.79–59.21), 0.317
N 2.0 mm/245.63 (21.18–70.09), 0.317
T 3.0 mm/217.46 (2.59–32.33), 0.317
N 3.0 mm/226.81 (13.68–39.93), 0.317

A versus CT 0.5 mm/274.12 (16.74–131.50), 0.317
N 0.5 mm/230.71 (−7.14–74.56), 0.317
T 1.0 mm/629.01 (15.01–49.00), 0.1750.851
N 1.0 mm/655.05 (28.60–81.50), 0.4780.573
S 1.0 mm/250.92 (−6.18–108.03), 0.317
I 1.0 mm/247.42 (3.89–90.94), 0.317
T 2.0 mm/224.26 (−1.59–50.11), 0.317
N 2.0 mm/267.60 (3.77–91.43), 0.317
T 3.0 mm/220.12 (10.06–30.17), 0.317
N 3.0 mm/227.01 (13.65–40.38), 0.317

F Vs CT 0.5 mm/235.06 (−36.61–106.73), 0.317
N 0.5 mm/2−9.35 (−34.53–15.84), 0.317
T 1.0 mm/65.86 (−12.10–23.81), 0.9170.851
N 1.0 mm/617.13 (−1.09–35.34), 0.7610.573
S 1.0 mm/219.54 (−33.19–72.28), 0.317
I 1.0 mm/215.64 (−32.93–64.21), 0.317
T 2.0 mm/216.26 (−13.02–45.54), 0.317
N 2.0 mm/218.37 (−6.87–43.61), 0.317
T 3.0 mm/24.75 (−3.41–12.91), 0.317
N 3.0 mm/20.98 (−12.55–14.51), 0.317

T: temporal; N: nasal; S: superior; I: inferior; WMD: weighted mean differences; CI: confidence interval; A: amblyopia; C: control; F: fellow.