Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017, Article ID 3161680, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3161680
Clinical Study

25-Gauge Vitrectomy in Open Eye Injury with Retained Foreign Body

1Department of Medical Basic Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari “A. Moro”, Bari, Italy
2Eye Clinic, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare, No. 11, 70124 Bari, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to A. Niro; ti.ilacsit@rin.derfla

Received 10 September 2016; Accepted 22 December 2016; Published 9 January 2017

Academic Editor: Sundaram Natarajan

Copyright © 2017 G. Sborgia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. J. Pieramici, M. W. MacCumber, M. U. Humayun, M. J. Marsh, and E. de Juan Jr., “Open-globe injury. Update on types of injuries and visual results,” Ophthalmology, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 1798–1803, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Entezari, H. M. Rabei, M. M. Badalabadi, and M. Mohebbi, “Visual outcome and ocular survival in open-globe injuries,” Injury, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 633–637, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. P. Ehlers, D. Y. Kunimoto, S. Ittoop, J. I. Maguire, A. C. Ho, and C. D. Regillo, “Metallic intraocular foreign bodies: characteristics, interventions, and prognostic factors for visual outcome and globe survival,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 427–433.e2, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. Demircan, M. Soylu, M. Yagmur, H. Akkaya, A. A. Ozcan, and I. Varinli, “Pars plana vitrectomy in ocular injury with intraocular foreign body,” Journal of Trauma—Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1216–1218, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. B. Wani, M. Al-Ajmi, L. Thalib et al., “Vitrectomy for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies: visual results and prognostic factors,” Retina, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 654–660, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. M. A. El-Asrar, S. A. Al-Amro, N. Khan, and D. Kangave, “Visual outcome and prognostic factors after vitrectomy for posterior segment foreign bodies,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 304–311, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. Yuksel, U. Celik, C. Alagoz, H. Dundar, B. Celik, and A. T. Yazlcl, “23 Gauge pars plana vitrectomy for the removal of retained intraocular foreign bodies,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 15, no. 1, article 75, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Singh, S. Bhalekar, M. R. Dogra, and A. Gupta, “23-Gauge vitrectomy with intraocular foreign body removal via the limbus: an alternative approach for select cases,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 707–710, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. D. Nicoară, I. Irimescu, T. Călinici, and C. Cristian, “Intraocular foreign bodies extracted by pars plana vitrectomy: clinical characteristics, management, outcomes and prognostic factors,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 15, article 151, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Kunikata, M. Uematsu, T. Nakazawa, and N. Fuse, “Successful removal of large intraocular foreign body by 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2011, pp. 1–4, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Kiss and D. Vavvas, “25-Gauge transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy for the removal of retained lens fragments and intraocular foreign bodies,” Retina, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1346–1351, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. Mester and F. Kuhn, “Ferrous intraocular foreign bodies retained in the posterior segment: management options and results,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 355–362, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. R. Chow, B. R. Garretson, B. Kuczynski et al., “External versus internal approach to the removal of metallic intraocular foreign bodies,” Retina, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 364–369, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Wickham, W. Xing, C. Bunce, and P. Sullivan, “Outcomes of surgery for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies—a retrospective review of 17 years of clinical experience,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 244, no. 12, pp. 1620–1626, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Yeh, M. H. Colyer, and E. D. Weichel, “Current trends in the management of intraocular foreign bodies,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 225–233, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. A. Mittra and W. F. Mieler, “Controversies in the management of open-globe injuries involving the posterior segment,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 215–225, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. B. Thach, T. P. Ward, J. S. B. Dick II et al., “Intraocular foreign body injuries during operation Iraqi freedom,” Ophthalmology, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 1829–1833, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. H. Colyer, E. D. Weber, E. D. Weichel et al., “Delayed intraocular foreign body removal without endophthalmitis during operations Iraqi freedom and enduring freedom,” Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1439–1447, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. B. Jonas, H. L. J. Knorr, and W. M. Budde, “Prognostic factors in ocular injuries caused by intraocular or retrobulbar foreign bodies,” Ophthalmology, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 823–828, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. L. Issac, V. C. Ghanem, and M. A. Nascimento, “Prognostic factors in open globe injuries,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 217, pp. 431–435, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  21. I. A. Chaudhry, F. A. Shamsi, E. Al-Harthi, A. Al-Theeb, E. Elzaridi, and F. C. Riley, “Incidence and visual outcome of endophthalmitis associated with intraocular foreign bodies,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 246, no. 2, pp. 181–186, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. S. Lit and L. H. Y. Young, “Anterior and posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies,” International Ophthalmology Clinics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 107–120, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. W. Parke III, A. Pathengay, H. W. Flynn Jr., T. Albini, and S. G. Schwartz, “Risk factors for endophthalmitis and retinal detachment with retained intraocular foreign bodies,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2012, Article ID 758526, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. Feng, Y. Hu, C. Wang et al., “Risk factors, anatomical, and visual outcomes of injured eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: eye injury vitrectomy study,” Retina, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1512–1518, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Kellner, B. Wimpissinger, U. Stolba, W. Brannath, and S. Binder, “25-Gauge vs 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 945–948, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. C. Park, B. Ramasamy, S. Shaw, S. Prasad, and R. H. L. Ling, “A prospective and nationwide study investigating endophthalmitis following pars plana vitrectomy: incidence and risk factors,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 529–533, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. U. Scott, H. W. Flynn Jr., N. Acar et al., “Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20-gauge vs 23-gauge vs 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 377–380, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W. F. Schrader, “Epidemiology of open globe injuries: analysis of 1026 injuries in 18 years,” Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde, vol. 221, no. 8, pp. 629–635, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C.-S. Yang, C.-K. Lu, F.-L. Lee, W.-M. Hsu, Y.-F. Lee, and S.-M. Lee, “Treatment and outcome of traumatic endophthalmitis in open globe injury with retained intraocular foreign body,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 224, no. 2, pp. 79–85, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Y. Zhang, M. N. Zhang, C. H. Jiang, Y. Yao, and K. Zhang, “Endophthalmitis following open globe injury,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 111–114, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. C. Chiquet, P. Gain, J.-C. Zech, P. Adeleine, and P. Denis, “Risk factors for retinal detachment after extraction of intraocular foreign bodies,” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 168–176, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Soheilian, M. Feghi, S. Yazdani et al., “Surgical management of non-metallic and non-magnetic metallic intraocular foreign bodies,” Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 189–196, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus