Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017, Article ID 6906139, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6906139
Research Article

A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery

1Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore
2Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore
3Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence should be addressed to Shamira Perera; moc.liamtoh@arereparimahs

Received 6 September 2016; Revised 16 November 2016; Accepted 23 November 2016; Published 29 March 2017

Academic Editor: Tamer A. Macky

Copyright © 2017 Annabel C. Y. Chew et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Dick, T. Kohnen, F. Jacobi, and K. W. Jacobi, “Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. T. Walkow, N. Anders, and S. Klebe, “Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 727–732, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Baradaran-Rafii, M. Rahmati-Kamel, M. Eslani, V. Kiavash, and F. Karimian, “Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 732–737, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. M. Bourne, L. R. Nelson, and D. O. Hodge, “Continued endothelial cell loss ten years after lens implantation,” Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1014–1022, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Bourne, D. Minassian, J. Dart, P. Rosen, S. Kaushal, and N. Wingate, “Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium, modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 679–685, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Hugod, A. Storr-Paulsen, J. Norregaard, J. Nicolini, A. B. Larsen, and J. Thulesen, “Corneal endothelial cell changes associated with cataract surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Cornea, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 749–753, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. A. Fakhry and M. I. El Shazly, “Torsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataract,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 5, pp. 973–978, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Zeng, X. Liu, Y. Sia et al., “Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 1092–1096, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Van den Bruel, J. Gailly, S. Devriese, N. J. Welton, A. J. Shortt, and F. Vrijens, “The protective effect of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on endothelial cell loss during cataract surgery: a meta-analysis using mixed treatment comparisons,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 5–10, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Oshika, H. Bissen-Miyajima, Y. Fujita et al., “Prospective randomized comparison of DisCoVisc and Healon 5 in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation,” Eye (London, England), vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1376–1381, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Ben-Eliahu, K. Tal, A. Milstein, T. Levin-Harrus, N. Ezov, and G. Kleinmann, “Protective effect of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on corneal endothelial cells during phacoemulsification: rabbit model,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1972–1975, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. S. Peh, Z. Chng, H. P. Ang et al., “Propagation of human corneal endothelial cells: a novel dual media approach,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 287–304, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. A. Tsonis, Animal models in eye research, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1st edition, 2008.
  14. A. K. Riau, T. NY, R. I. Angunawela, H. M. Htoon, S. S. Chaurasia, and J. S. Mehta, “Reproducibility and age-related changes of ocular parametric measurements in rabbits,” BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 8, p. 138, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. L. Van Horn, D. D. Sendele, S. Seideman, and P. J. Buco, “Regenerative capacity of the corneal endothelium in rabbit and cat,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 597–613, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. S. Minkowski, S. P. Bartels, F. C. Delori, S. R. Lee, K. R. Kenyon, and A. H. Neufeld, “Corneal endothelial function and structure following cryo-injury in the rabbit,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1416–1425, 1984. View at Google Scholar