Clinical Study

Effect of Preoperative Intravitreal Bevacizumab on the Surgical Outcome of Neovascular Glaucoma at Different Stages

Table 1

Baseline demographics and ocular characteristics of participants (total of 70 eyes).

Total ( eyes)IVB group ( eyes)Control ( eyes) value (IVB versus control)

Gender (male/female, number of patients)56/1438/718/70.212
Age (years)58 ± 1359 ± 1057 ± 180.556
Causes of NVG, number (%)
 PDR47 (67)33 (73)14 (56)
 CRVO8 (11)5 (11)3 (12)0.110
 OIS12 (17)7 (16)5 (20)
Baseline IOP (mmHg)40.5 ± 9.240.3 ± 9.741.0 ± 8.40.759
Baseline BCVA (LogMAR)2.01 ± 1.111.96 ± 1.072.12 ± 1.200.556
Presence of NVA, number (%)66 (94)42 (93)24 (96)1.000
PAS extent, number (%)
 Less than 50%46 (66)35 (78)11 (44)0.004
 More than 50%24 (34)10 (22)14 (56)
Preoperative PRP, number (%)56 (80)38 (84)18 (72)0.212
Postoperative follow-up (months) [range]27 ± 15 [12–68]26 ± 16 [12–68]27 ± 14 [12–67]0.721

IVB = intravitreal bevacizumab; NVG = neovascular glaucoma; PDR = proliferative diabetic retinopathy; CRVO = central retinal vein occlusion; OIS = ocular ischemic syndrome; IOP = intraocular pressure; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; MAR = minimal angle of resolution; NVA = neovascularization of angle; PAS = peripheral anterior synechiae; PRP = panretinal photocoagulation. Continuous variables are represented as mean ± standard deviation.