Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2018, Article ID 2401213, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2401213
Research Article

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Three Common Dry Eye Questionnaires in Chinese

1School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
2The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Aizhu Tao; moc.361@207zatzw

Received 13 April 2018; Accepted 16 July 2018; Published 27 August 2018

Academic Editor: Marta Sacchetti

Copyright © 2018 Fan Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. A. Lemp, C. Baudouin, J. Baum et al., “The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye Workshop (2007),” Ocular Surface, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 75–92, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. W. McMonnies, “Key questions in a dry eye history,” Journal of the American Optometric Association, vol. 57, pp. 512–517, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. McAlinden, R. Gao, Q. Wang et al., “Rasch analysis of three dry eye questionnaires and correlates with objective clinical tests,” Ocular Surface, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 202–210, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. O. D. Schein, J. M. Tielsch, B. Munoz, K. Bandeen-Roche, and S. West, “Relationship between signs and symptoms of dry eye in the elderly. A population-based perspective,” Ophthalmology, vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 1395–1401, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. O. P. van Bijsterveld, “Diagnostic tests in the Sicca syndrome,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Mizuno, M. Yamada, Y. Miyake, and Dry Eye Survey Group of the National Hospital Organization of Japan, “Association between clinical diagnostic tests and health-related quality of life surveys in patients with dry eye syndrome,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 259–265, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. M. Schiffman, M. D. Christianson, G. Jacobsen, J. D. Hirsch, and B. L. Reis, “Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 615–621, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Guo, R. Peng, K. Feng, and J. Hong, “Diagnostic performance of McMonnies questionnaire as a screening survey for dry eye: a multicenter analysis,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2016, Article ID 6210853, 6 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. Erdfelder, F. Faul, and A. Buchner, “GPOWER: a general power analysis program,” Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. A. Lemp, “Report of the national eye institute/industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eyes,” CLAO Journal, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 221–232, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. W. McMonnies, A. Ho, and D. Wakefield, “Optimum dry eye classification using questionnaire responses,” in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, pp. 835–838, Springer, Boston, MA, USA, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. K. K. Nichols, J. J. Nichols, and G. L. Mitchell, “The reliability and validity of McMonnies dry eye index,” Cornea, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 365–371, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. K. Nichols, J. J. Nichols, and G. L. Mitchell, “The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease,” Cornea, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 762–770, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus