Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2018, Article ID 2439691, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2439691
Clinical Study

The Relationship between Peripheral Nerve Conduction Velocity and Ophthalmological Findings in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Early Diabetic Retinopathy

1Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
2Department of Retinal Disease Control, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
3Department of Metabolism and Diabetes, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
4Department of Advanced Ophthalmic Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
5Department of Ophthalmic Imaging and Information Analytics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Hiroshi Kunikata; pj.ca.ukohot.dem.hpo@atakinuk

Received 1 September 2017; Revised 15 December 2017; Accepted 15 January 2018; Published 20 February 2018

Academic Editor: Lawrence S. Morse

Copyright © 2018 Azusa Ito et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) is an indicator of neuronal damage in the distal segment of the peripheral nerves. Here, we determined the association between NCV and other systemic and ocular clinical findings, in type 2 diabetes patients with early diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods. This study included 42 eyes of 42 type 2 diabetes patients (median age: 54 years) with no DR or with mild nonproliferative DR. Standard statistical techniques were used to determine associations between clinical findings. Results. Sural sensory conduction velocity (SCV) and tibial motor conduction velocity (MCV) were significantly lower in mild nonproliferative DR patients than patients with no DR ( and , resp.). Furthermore, logistic regression analyses revealed that sural SCV and tibial MCV were independent factors contributing to the presence of mild nonproliferative DR (OR 0.83, and OR 0.69 , resp.). Tibial MCV was correlated with choroidal thickness (CT) (), and a multiple regression analysis revealed that age, tibial MCV, and carotid intima-media thickness were independent associating factors with CT (, , and , resp.). Conclusions. Our findings suggest that reduced NCV may be closely associated with early DR in type 2 diabetes patients. Thus, reduced nerve conduction is a potential early biomarker of DR.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus affects over 350 million people worldwide [1], and approximately one-third of these people are also affected by diabetic retinopathy (DR), or will go on to develop it. Thus, DR has become a leading cause of visual disability among working-aged adults in both developing and developed countries [2]. Diabetes can cause vision-threatening complications, including macular ischemia, diabetic macular edema (DME), and neovascularization, that is, proliferative DR (PDR), even with advances in therapies [3, 4]. Antivascular endothelial growth factors are a common strategy to treat DME, but the disease often recurs, and the clinical success of this treatment is affected by significant numbers of nonresponders [5]. Thus, the best strategy is to prevent the development of PDR and DME in patients with diabetes. Therefore, it is important to understand the pathogenesis of PDR and DME and to find clinically useful new biomarkers of early DR [6, 7].

DR is one of the three major microvascular diabetic complications, together with neuropathy and nephropathy. These complications, all of which are caused by diabetic microvascular disturbances, are generally thought to arise sequentially: neuropathy occurs first, followed by retinopathy, and finally nephropathy. Indeed, diabetic peripheral neuropathy has been observed during the early, impaired glucose tolerance period of diabetes [8, 9]. Moreover, neuronal damage in the distal segment of the peripheral nerves is associated with objective measurements of neuropathy, such as nerve conduction velocity (NCV). In patients with diabetes, retinal neuroglial dysfunction occurs before ophthalmoscopically visible signs of retinopathy (i.e., vascular changes) are seen. This raises the possibility that NCV may be a biomarker of diabetes progression, including ocular complications, in the earliest stages. However, the association between NCV and the severity of retinopathy, as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, has not yet been fully investigated. Furthermore, the relationship between NCV and OCT findings, particularly choroidal thickness (CT), remains unclear [1014].

The development of OCT has enabled ophthalmologists to quickly, easily, and noninvasively measure CT, as well as central macular thickness (CMT). Recent reports have shown that alterations in CT are associated with the pathogenesis of various ocular diseases, including DR [1519]. However, the association of CT with NCV is still unclear, particularly in eyes with early DR, that is, those with no DR (NDR) or with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR) [20]. Thus, in this study, we determined the association between systemic clinical findings, including NCV, and ocular clinical findings, including measurement of retinal structure, in type 2 diabetes patients with early DR, in order to search for new and early biomarkers of DR.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Setting and Design

This was an institutional, cross-sectional, nonrandomized, observational case series.

2.2. Patients

All subjects had type 2 diabetes with either NDR or mild NPDR [20] and were observed at the Tohoku University Hospital. The subjects underwent a baseline ophthalmic examination, including measurement of visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP), a slit lamp examination, and a fundus examination.

The inclusion criteria were diabetes with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 6.5% and ongoing pharmacological treatment for diabetes. The exclusion criteria were the presence of pancreatogenic diabetes (type 3c diabetes), hepatic diabetes, gestational diabetes, secondary diabetes from endocrine disease or type 1 diabetes; ongoing hemodialysis; current malignant, inflammatory disease or chronic respiratory disease; age-related macular degeneration; glaucoma; retinal diseases other than DR; and a history of intraocular surgery.

The severity of DR was evaluated in the right eye of each patient by the same experienced ophthalmologist with indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit-lamp biomicroscopy of the posterior segment with a +90 D lens (Volk Optical Inc., Mentor, Ohio, USA) according to the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) criteria [20, 21].

The institutional review board of the Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from each patient for his or her participation in the research (University Hospital Medical Information Network; UMIN Study ID number: UMIN000023859), and the research was conducted according to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki, 1995 (as revised in Edinburgh, 2000).

2.3. Main Outcome Measure

Standard statistical techniques were used to determine associations between clinical findings, including diabetes duration, creatinine, blood levels of HbA1c, CT in OCT scans, intima-media thickness (IMT) in ultrasound B-scans of the right common carotid artery, and NCV.

2.4. Measurement of Physical and Ophthalmological Findings

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured after the patients had rested in a sitting position for 10 min. Measurements were made in the left brachial artery at the height of the heart with an automated blood pressure monitor (HEM-759E, Omron Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The subjects fasted 12 hours before collection of the blood samples. HbA1c, total cholesterol, and creatinine were measured with automated standardized laboratory techniques. IMT was measured in ultrasound B-scans of the common carotid artery, made with the ProSound F75 (Hitachi-Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). Ophthalmological examinations included fundus photography and measurement of visual acuity, IOP, and spherical equivalent (SE). This study used 3D-OCT (Topcon 3D OCT-2000, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) to measure CMT and enhanced depth imaging (EDI) OCT (OCT Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) to manually measure subfoveal CT. All included OCT data had a minimum image quality > 35 for 3D-OCT and a minimum quality score > 20 for EDI OCT. The eye of each patient with the worse grade of retinopathy was included. If the grade was similar in both eyes, the right eye was selected.

2.5. Measurement of Nerve Conduction Velocity

NCV was measured with the MEB-2312 device (Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The types of NCV measured in this study were median motor conduction velocity (MCV), median sensory conduction velocity (SCV), tibial MCV, and sural SCV.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Variables were expressed as the median (interquartile range (IQR)). The Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test were used to evaluate differences in clinical findings in the NDR and mild NPDR groups. Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to estimate relationships between variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the significance of the presence of DR in the patients. Separate multiple linear regression analyses were performed to analyze each independent variable potentially affecting CT. All statistical analyses were performed with the R software (version 3.2.0, R core team). Differences were considered significant at .

3. Results

The clinical characteristics of the diabetes patients are shown in Table 1. This study included 42 patients with type 2 diabetes (26 male, 16 female; median age: 54 years; age range: 27–61). There were no differences in age, sex, SBP, creatinine, total cholesterol, VA, SE, IOP, HbA1c, carotid IMT, or CT in the NDR and mild NPDR groups (25 and 17 patients, resp.) (Table 1 and Figure 1(c)). However, diabetes duration was significantly longer () and CMT was significantly higher () in the mild NPDR group than in the NDR group (Table 1). Furthermore, median MCV, tibial MCV, and sural SCV were significantly lower in the mild NPDR group than in the NDR group (, , and ; Table 1 and Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).

Table 1: Clinical characteristics of diabetes patients without diabetic retinopathy (NDR) and with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).
Figure 1: Nerve conduction velocity and choroidal thickness in early diabetic retinopathy. (a) Sural sensory conduction velocity (SCV) was lower in mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients than in no diabetic retinopathy (NDR) patients (). (b) Tibial motor conduction velocity (MCV) was lower in patients with mild NPDR than in patients with NDR (). (c) choroidal thickness was higher in patients with mild NPDR than patients with NDR, but with no significant difference (). Mann-Whitney U test: and ; NS: not significant.

Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that sural SCV was an independent factor associated with the presence of mild NPDR (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71–0.96; ; Table 2) and that no other clinical findings, including HbA1c or diabetes duration, were associated. Multiple logistic regression analysis also revealed that tibial MCV was an independent factor associated with the presence of mild NPDR (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.51–0.94; ; Table 3) and that no other clinical findings, including HbA1c or diabetic duration, were associated.

Table 2: Multiple logistic regression analysis of independent factors associated with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Table 3: Multiple logistic regression analysis of independent factors associated with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Tibial MCV was positively correlated with sural SCV (, , Figure 2(a)). However, there was no such association between sural SCV and CT (Figure 2(b)). By contrast, tibial MCV was negatively correlated with CT (, , Figure 2(c)).

Figure 2: Relationship between nerve conduction velocity and choroidal thickness. (a) Tibial motor conduction velocity (MCV) was positively correlated with sural SCV (, ). (b) There was no relationship between sural sensory conduction velocity (SCV) and choroidal thickness. (c) Tibial MCV was negatively correlated with choroidal thickness (, ).

Finally, multiple regression analysis revealed that age and carotid IMT were independent associated factors with CT ( and , resp.; Table 4). Multiple regression analysis also revealed that age, tibial MCV, and carotid IMT were independent associated factors with CT (, , and , resp.; Table 5).

Table 4: Multiple linear regression analysis of independent factors associated with choroidal thickness.
Table 5: Multiple linear regression analysis of independent factors associated with choroidal thickness.

4. Discussion

We set out to determine associations between ocular and systemic clinical findings, particularly NCV, in type 2 diabetes patients with early DR. We found that sural SCV and tibial MCV were significantly lower in patients with mild NPDR than those with NDR. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis revealed that these types of NCV were independent factors associated with the presence of mild NPDR. In addition, tibial MCV was negatively correlated with CT. Finally, a multiple regression analysis revealed that age, tibial MCV, and carotid IMT were associated with CT.

The association between reduced NCV and the presence of mild NPDR was one of the most interesting findings of the current study. Duration of diabetes and the level of HbA1c have been reported to be the most important risk factors for DR [22, 23]. In the current study, these factors were similar in patients with NDR and mild NPDR, and a multiple regression analysis revealed that while diabetes duration and HbA1c level were not associated with the presence of mild NPDR, peripheral NCV was associated. This finding extends existing knowledge of alterations in peripheral NCV during early diabetes. Clinically, the most frequent and earliest sign of diabetic neuropathy is abnormal plantar sensation, making the association of SCV impairment and DR easy to understand. However, MCV has also been reported to be very useful for the early detection of diabetic polyneuropathy [24, 25]. Previous research has shown that impaired NCV is closely correlated with DR, proteinuria, and the duration of diabetes [10] and that median MCV becomes significantly reduced with the progression of DR [11]. Moreover, reductions in median MCV, as well as SCV, have been reported to be correlated with the progression of DR, from more than 10 years before it first manifests until it reaches the proliferative stage [11]. Unfortunately, we could not confirm previous findings that median SCV was also reduced in NPDR (we did not find a significant difference: ) [11]. One possible reason for this discrepancy is current limitations in the ability to accurately measure upper limb NCV, which can be affected by factors such as carpal-tunnel syndrome [26]. Furthermore, the nerves in the lower limbs have been reported to be more susceptible than those in the upper limbs to the effects of diabetes, suggesting that longer nerves may be affected more often [27]. Diabetes also generally affects the most distal peripheral nerves earlier. Thus, the lower limbs may be the most appropriate location for accurately measuring impairment of peripheral NCV, including sural SCV and tibial MCV, and we therefore consider that our finding of an association between NCV and DR is reliable.

Another interesting finding in the current study was that tibial MCV was associated with subfoveal CT. Diabetic choroidopathy is thought to originate, like DR, in microangiopathy [28, 29], but the relationship between CT and NCV has not been adequately investigated. Although the significance of changes in CT in eyes with DR still remains the subject of debate, clinical reports have shown that CT increases significantly as the severity of DR progresses through the mild, moderate, and NPDR stages, culminating in PDR [16]. Furthermore, CT decreases after photocoagulation treatment [16]. The subfoveal choroid is also thicker in eyes with DME than without DME, being thickest in eyes with serous retinal detachment-type DME [16]. Other research has shown that patients with early DR, that is, NPDR, had higher CT than healthy controls and that choroidal thickening was more severe in diabetes patients with neuropathy than those without neuropathy [19]. This might be due to the fact that smooth muscle in the choroid is dominated by the autonomic nervous system, which can be impaired in diabetes, that is, in diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Autonomic influences on the vasculature of the eye have been shown to directly control ocular blood flow in the optic nerve, choroid, ciliary body, and iris and to have an indirect influence on retinal blood flow [30]. Contrary to the close relationship between tibial MCV and CT, the current study showed no relationship between sural SCV and CT, a finding that remains hard to explain. This result may have been due to measurement errors in sural SCV. Inadequate control of skin temperature and measurement error of the skin surface distance affect more SCV than MCV [31]. Indeed, the reproducibility of sural SCV is low among several parameters of a nerve conduction study [32]. Thus, the results of previous studies, considered together with our new finding that lower-limb MCV is related to CT, suggest that diabetic autonomic impairment may also be associated with alterations in the choroid, which is dominated by the autonomic nervous system, in eyes with NDR or early DR during the early, impaired glucose tolerance stage of diabetes.

Another novel finding of this study was that carotid IMT was associated with CT in a multiple regression analysis. Ultrasound measurement of IMT reflects the thickness of the tunica intima and tunica media, which are the inner two layers of the artery wall. IMT is clinically used to detect the presence of atherosclerotic disease and to evaluate the progression of atherosclerosis over time [33, 34]. There are numerous clinical reports showing that carotid IMT is associated with type 2 diabetes and that the IMT increases in about one-third of diabetes patients with impaired glucose tolerance [35]. Additionally, clinical reports on the relationship between carotid IMT and DR have shown that carotid IMT is greater in patients with PDR than those with NPDR [36]. Type 2 diabetes-associated carotid plaque burden is also higher in patients with DR than those without DR [37]. Thus, based on current and past results, we speculate that increased carotid IMT, which normally reflects thickening of large vessels such as the carotid artery, is also closely associated with the pathogeneses of both DR and diabetic choroidopathy, diseases associated with alterations in much smaller vessels. These alterations in peripheral microvascular structure are associated with the pathogenesis of diabetes-related complications, even in NDR and early DR.

Our study was somewhat limited by its cross-sectional design, its small sample size, and the lack of healthy control subjects. However, previous data shows that normal NCV is 59.1 m/s for median MCV, 65.2 m/s for median SCV, 47.6 m/s for tibial MCV, and 52.0 m/s for sural SCV [32]. Additionally, although we did not measure macular stratified thickness [13, 14] or use full-field electroretinography in the current study, we consider that reports on the association between findings obtained with these methods and diabetic retinopathy are important [38, 39]. While this study found that there may be a relationship between NCV and CT in eyes with early DR, we cannot draw any more detailed conclusions on the underlying cause of this relationship. Although it is likely that diabetic autonomic impairment may cause increased CT, the mechanism of this effect is likely complicated, and it remains unclear. Nevertheless, we consider that our findings on the relationship of NCV and CT in diabetes patients are reliable, because they are based on carefully selected subjects and clinical findings, including NCV, that were objectively measured. Furthermore, we mainly used lower-limb NCV data, which should have excluded any bias that could have been caused by the measurement of upper-limb NCV. Additionally, since different types of disease have different pathological mechanisms and conditions, we focused only on type 2 diabetes, which has an increasing worldwide prevalence, and used similar methods as in previous objective reports on diabetes.

In conclusion, we found that sural SCV and tibial MCV which were lower in mild NPDR patients than in NDR patients were independent factors associated with the presence of mild NPDR and that tibial MCV was negatively correlated with CT. Moreover, decreased tibial MCV was closely associated with DR and with increased CT in type 2 diabetes patients. Therefore, we believe that NCV is a promising biomarker of DR and may have the potential for use when no professional ophthalmological examination is possible. However, it cannot replace a standard ophthalmological examination. Furthermore, nerve conduction, especially tibial MCV, might be a potential source of novel biomarkers of DR during its early stages. Our findings call for additional investigation to determine whether reduced NCV has a causal relationship with diabetic changes in the structure and function of the eye, including CT.

Disclosure

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article. The funders had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The principal investigator, Dr. Azusa Ito, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis. This paper was supported in part by JST grants from JSPS KAKENHI Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (HK 17K11445).

References

  1. D. R. Whiting, L. Guariguata, C. Weil, and J. Shaw, “IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 311–321, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. M. Ruta, D. J. Magliano, R. LeMesurier, H. R. Taylor, P. Z. Zimmet, and J. E. Shaw, “Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes in developing and developed countries,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 387–398, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Shimura, T. Nakazawa, K. Yasuda et al., “Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 854–861.e3, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. D. Schoenberger, D. M. Miller, C. D. Riemann et al., “Outcomes of 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in the surgical management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy,” Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 474–480, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Virgili, M. Parravano, F. Menchini, and J. R. Evans, “Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Hashimoto, H. Kunikata, M. Yasuda et al., “The relationship between advanced glycation end products and ocular circulation in type 2 diabetes,” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1371–1377, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Yasuda, M. Shimura, H. Kunikata et al., “Relationship of skin autofluorescence to severity of retinopathy in type 2 diabetes,” Current Eye Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 338–345, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. J. Dyck, P. J. B. Dyck, C. J. Klein, and S. D. Weigand, “Does impaired glucose metabolism cause polyneuropathy? Review of previous studies and design of a prospective controlled population-based study,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 536–541, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. J. Dyck, J. E. Norell, H. Tritschler et al., “Challenges in design of multicenter trials: end points assessed longitudinally for change and monotonicity,” Diabetes Care, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2619–2625, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Sasaki, K. Nanjo, M. Yamada et al., “Diabetic neuropathy as a heterogeneous syndrome: multivariate analysis of clinical and neurological findings,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 215–222, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Morimoto, Y. Suzuki, A. Tada, M. Akui, Y. Ozawa, and T. Maruyama, “Time-course changes in nerve conduction velocity (NCV) in type 2 diabetes,” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 237–240, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Charles, S. S. Soedamah-Muthu, S. Tesfaye et al., “Low peripheral nerve conduction velocities and amplitudes are strongly related to diabetic microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2648–2653, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Kim, E. S. Kim, S. Y. Rhee, S. Chon, J.-t. Woo, and S.-Y. Yu, “Clinical characteristics and risk factors for retinal diabetic neurodegeneration in type 2 diabetes,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 993–999, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Kim, S. Y. Yu, H. W. Kwak, and E. S. Kim, “Retinal neurodegeneration associated with peripheral nerve conduction and autonomic nerve function in diabetic patients,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 170, pp. 15–24, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Maruko, T. Iida, Y. Sugano, A. Ojima, and T. Sekiryu, “Subfoveal choroidal thickness in fellow eyes of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy,” Retina, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1603–1608, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. T. Kim, D. H. Lee, S. G. Joe, J. G. Kim, and Y. H. Yoon, “Changes in choroidal thickness in relation to the severity of retinopathy and macular edema in type 2 diabetic patients,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 3378–3384, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. Rayess, E. Rahimy, G.-s. Ying et al., “Baseline choroidal thickness as a predictor for response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 85–91.e3, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Y. Shin, K. Y. Kwon, and S. H. Byeon, “Association between choroidal thickness and the response to intravitreal ranibizumab injection in age-related macular degeneration,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 524–532, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Yazici, E. S. Sari, R. Koc et al., “Alterations of choroidal thickness with diabetic neuropathy,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1518–1522, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group, “Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10,” Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 786–806, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group, “Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. ETDRS report number 7,” Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 741–756, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Klein, B. E. Klein, S. E. Moss, M. D. Davis, and D. L. DeMets, “The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 527–532, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Klein, B. E. Klein, S. E. Moss, M. D. Davis, and D. L. DeMets, “The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 520–526, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Andersen, E. Stålberg, and B. Falck, “F-wave latency, the most sensitive nerve conduction parameter in patients with diabetes mellitus,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1296–1302, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. M. Baba, K. Kimura, T. Suda, and S. Yagihashi, “Three-year inhibition of aldose reductase on development of symptomatic neuropathy in diabetic patients,” Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 176–178, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Bravaccio, M. Trabucco, A. Ammendola, and R. Cantore, “Carpal tunnel syndrome: a clinical electrophysiological study of 84 cases,” Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 269–281, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Ahmad, A. Moinuddin, A. Ahsan, and A. Goel, “Study of electrophysiological changes in sensory nerves among diabetic smokers,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. CC09–CC11, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. A. Hidayat and B. S. Fine, “Diabetic choroidopathy. Light and electron microscopic observations of seven cases,” Ophthalmology, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 512–522, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. F. Toyoda, Y. Tanaka, M. Shimmura, N. Kinoshita, H. Takano, and A. Kakehashi, “Diabetic retinal and choroidal edema in SDT rats,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 2345141, 6 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. H. McDougal and P. D. Gamlin, “Autonomic control of the eye,” Comprehensive Physiology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 439–473, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. S. Koo, C. S. Cho, and B.-J. Kim, “Pitfalls in using electrophysiological studies to diagnose neuromuscular disorders,” Journal of Clinical Neurology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. Kohara, J. Kimura, R. Kaji et al., “F-wave latency serves as the most reproducible measure in nerve conduction studies of diabetic polyneuropathy: multicentre analysis in healthy subjects and patients with diabetic polyneuropathy,” Diabetologia, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 915–921, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. E. de Groot, S. I. van Leuven, R. Duivenvoorden et al., “Measurement of carotid intima-media thickness to assess progression and regression of atherosclerosis,” Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 280–288, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. H. O'Leary and M. L. Bots, “Imaging of atherosclerosis: carotid intima-media thickness,” European Heart Journal, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 1682–1689, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Brohall, A. Oden, and B. Fagerberg, “Carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance: a systematic review,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 609–616, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. Saif, S. Karawya, and A. Abdelhamid, “Retinopathy is a strong determinant of atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes: correlation with carotid intima media thickness,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 226–230, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. Alonso, A. Traveset, E. Rubinat et al., “Type 2 diabetes-associated carotid plaque burden is increased in patients with retinopathy compared to those without retinopathy,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 33, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. W. Jansson, M. B. Raeder, and J. Krohn, “Photopic full-field electroretinography and optical coherence tomography in type 1 diabetic retinopathy,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 253, no. 7, pp. 989–997, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. Tzekov, “Full-field ERG in diabetic retinopathy: a screening tool?” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 253, no. 7, pp. 987-988, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus