Clinical Study
Visual-Evoked-Response-Supported Outcome of Intravitreal Erythropoietin in Management of Indirect Traumatic Optic Neuropathy
Table 4
Comparisons of means of BCVA, VER latency, and amplitude in patients receiving two EPO injections.
| | (BCVA LogMAR) 5 patients | VER latency (m·sec) 4 patients | VER amplitude (microns), 4 patients |
| Preinjection (baseline) | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 156.5 ± 13.48 | 9 ± 9.3 | After first injection | 1.5 ± 0.84 | 142.25 ± 18 | 17.3 ± 10.3 | After second injection | 1.13 ± 0.8 | 115.8 ± 19.24 | 16.38 ± 11 | Repeated measure ANOVA test | | | | Percent of patients improved after second injection | 60% | 100% | 50% | Before and after first injection | | | | Before and after second injection | | | | After first and second injection | | | |
|
|
Paired t-test value. BCVA LogMAR: best-corrected visual acuity in logarithm minimal angle of resolution; VER: visual evoked response. |