Comparison of Two Toric IOLs with Different Haptic Design: Optical Quality after 1 Year

Table 2

Postoperative results in the two study groups.

	AT TORBI IOL		Tecnis toric IOL
	Mean ± SD	Range	Mean ± SD	Range
UDVA (logMAR)	0.03 ± 0.13	−0.2–0.5	0.05 ± 0.14	−0.2–0.6	0.31
CDVA (logMAR)	−0.04 ± 0.09	−0.2–0.4	−0.03 ± 0.12	−0.2–0.3	0.35
Spherical error (D)	−0.51 ± 0.58	−1.5–1.0	−0.75 ± 0.51	−1.75–0.5	0.014
Spherical PE (D)	0.49 ± 0.59	−0.57–1.52	0.43 ± 0.62	−0.43–1.62	0.76
Cylindric error (D)	0.68 ± 0.41	0–1.75	0.74 ± 0.38	0–1.50	0.45
SE (D)	−0.15 ± 0.61	−1.5–1.43	−0.36 ± 0.51	−1.5–0.62	0.02
J0 (D)	−0.03 ± 0.27	−0.62–0.71	0.02 ± 0.29	−0.54–0.66	0.35
J45 (D)	0.004 ± 0.29	−0.62–0.84	−0.018 ± 0.29	−0.63–0.56	0.67
Corneal SA (μm)	0.44 ± 0.25	0.12–1.08	0.41 ± 0.25	−0.60–1.15	0.83
CCP (D)	44.23 ± 1.7	40.5–47.8	44.16 ± 1.7	40.9–47.8	0.83

CDVA = corrected distance visual acuity; UDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity; logMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; PE = predicted error; J0 and J45 = cylindrical vectors; SE = spherical equivalent; SA = spherical aberration (central 6 mm); CCP = central corneal power; dRotation (1 w–12 m) = difference of IOL rotation between the first week and 12th month; dAP (SL-iTrace) = difference of the measured axis placement with the two methods: SL = slit lamp and with the iTrace; P = difference between the two groups using generalized estimating equation.