Comparison of the Clinical Performance of Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal IOLs with Other Types of IOLs: A Meta-Analysis

Table 4

Comparison of contrast sensitivity between the Mplus group and the control group under photopic and low conditions.

Conditions	Study	Mplus group	Control group	Mplus IOLs provided better performance	Control group provided better performance
Photopic conditions	Alio et al. [7]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	High-add bifocal IOL: Acri.Lisa 366	In 3, 6, 12, 18 c/d	—
Photopic conditions	Alio et al. [8]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	High-add bifocal IOL: ReSTOR SN6AD3	In 3, 6, 12, 18 c/d	—
Photopic conditions	Alfonso et al. [13]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	Low-add bifocal IOL: ReSTOR SN6AD1	In 6 c/d	In 3, 12, 18 c/d
Photopic conditions	Rosa et al. [9]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	Spherical monofocal IOL: Acri.Smart 48S	—	In 0.6, 1.1, 2.2, 3.4, 7.1, 23.6 c/d
Photopic conditions	Alio et al. [3, 12]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	Spherical monofocal IOL: Acri.Smart 48S	In 3, 6 c/d	In 12, 18 c/d
Photopic conditions	Alio et al. [11]	Mplus LS-312 MF15	Accommodating IOL: Crystalens HD	—	In 3, 6, 12, 18 c/d
Low conditions	Alio et al. [7]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	High-add bifocal IOL: Acri.Lisa 366	In 3 c/d	In 6, 12, 18 c/d
Low conditions	Alio et al. [8]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	High-add bifocal IOL: ReSTOR SN6AD3	In 3, 6, 12, 18 c/d	—
Low conditions	Alfonso et al. [13]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	Low-add bifocal IOL: ReSTOR SN6AD1	In 3, 6, 12 c/d	In 18 c/d
Low conditions	Rosa et al. [9]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	Spherical monofocal IOL: Acri.Smart 48S	—	In 0.6, 1.1, 2.2, 3.4, 7.1, 23.6 c/d
Low conditions	Alio et al. [3, 12]	Mplus LS-312 MF30	Spherical monofocal IOL: Acri.Smart 48S	—	In 3, 6, 12, 18 c/d
Low conditions	Alio et al. [11]	Mplus LS-312 MF15	Accommodating IOL: Crystalens HD	In 18 c/d	In 3, 6, 12 c/d

Significantly different.