Research Article

Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses

Table 4

Mesopic log contrast sensitivity function at far distances without glare in multifocal intraocular lenses at 3-month follow-up.

ParameterGroup 1 OptiVisGroup 3 M-flexGroup 4 ReZoomGroup 5 ReSTOR value

Number of patients32323232
Number of eyes64646464

CS at 1.5 cpd1 versus 3 0.288
Mean ± SD1.56 ± 0.251.43 ± 0.221.42 ± 0.211.58 ± 0.221 versus 4 0.222
1 versus 5 0.996

CS at 3 cpd1 versus 3 0.560
Mean ± SD1.68 ± 0.381.57 ± 0.251.68 ± 0.211.72 ± 0.191 versus 4 1.000
1 versus 5 0.986

CS at 6 cpd1 versus 3 0.968
Mean ± SD1.26 ± 0.661.36 ± 0.561.56 ± 0.491.50 ± 0.381 versus 4 0.293
1 versus 5 0.503

CS at 12 cpd1 versus 3 0.909
Mean ± SD0.38 ± 0.540.53 ± 0.550.66 ± 0.680.45 ± 0.571 versus 4 0.482
1 versus 5 0.994

CS at 18 cpd1 versus 3 0.986
Mean ± SD0.19 ± 0.340.13 ± 0.290.48 ± 0.490.14 ± 0.341 versus 4 0.240
1 versus 5 0.994

ANOVA post hoc; CS, contrast sensitivity; spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree; SD, standard deviation.