Research Article

Comparison of Outcomes after Phacoemulsification with Two Different Corneal Incision Distances Anterior to the Limbus

Table 4

Corneal aberrations in the two groups (μm, mean ± SD).

PreoperativePostoperative (3 mo) value

Total aberration RMS
 Group A2.760 ± 1.6242.753 ± 1.7580.96
 Group B2.825 ± 2.0403.140 ± 2.0630.04
value0.900.48

Total HOA RMS
 Group A0.875 ± 0.3831.014 ± 0.4020.006
 Group B0.883 ± 0.4760.976 ± 0.4280.13
value0.950.75

Spherical aberration ()
 Group A0.442 ± 0.1930.423 ± 0.1970.274
 Group B0.408 ± 0.2170.395 ± 0.1890.54
value0.560.61

Oblique trefoil ()
 Group A−0.014 ± 0.193−0.149 ± 0.3590.08
 Group B0.020 ± 0.2460.003 ± 0.4010.87
value0.590.16

Vertical trefoil ()
 Group A−0.199 ± 0.302−0.394 ± 0.2740.003
 Group B−0.171 ± 0.2410.259 ± 0.3510.15
value0.710.13

Horizontal coma ()
 Group A−0.054 ± 0.195−0.041 ± 0.2060.66
 Group B0.017 ± 0.1830.075 ± 0.1800.016
value0.190.04

Vertical coma ()
 Group A0.345 ± 0.3320.312 ± 0.3150.33
 Group B0.331 ± 0.5350.303 ± 0.4630.59
value0.910.94

RMS = root mean square; HOA = higher-order aberration. Statistically significant at .