Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2019, Article ID 2593404, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2593404
Research Article

Diagnostic Sensitivity of Different Reference Bodies When Using Scheimpflug Tomography in a Myopic Population with Keratoconus

Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel Garcerant; moc.liamtoh@tnarecragleinad

Received 25 April 2019; Revised 17 June 2019; Accepted 25 June 2019; Published 18 July 2019

Guest Editor: Laura Remon

Copyright © 2019 Daniel Garcerant et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. J. Davis, K. B. Schechtman, B. S. Wilson et al., “Longitudinal changes in visual acuity in keratoconus,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 489–500, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Suzuki, S. Amano, N. Honda, T. Usui, S. Yamagami, and T. Oshika, “Longitudinal changes in corneal irregular astigmatism and visual acuity in eyes with keratoconus,” Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 265–269, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. M. Kymes, J. J. Walline, K. Zadnik, J. Sterling, and M. O. Gordon, “Changes in the quality-of-life of people with keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 145, no. 4, pp. 611–617, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. C. K. Tan, V. Nguyen, E. Fenwick, A. Ferdi, A. Dinh, and S. L. Watson, “Vision-related quality of life in keratoconus,” Cornea, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 600–604, 2019. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. C. F. Schmitt-Bernard, C. Lesage, and B. Arnaud, “Keratectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis in keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 368–370, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Seiler and A. W. Quurke, “Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1007–1009, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. K. Chiang, A. J. Park, C. J. Rapuano, and E. J. Cohen, “Bilateral keratoconus after LASIK in a keratoconus patient,” Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 90–92, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. B. Randleman, M. Woodward, M. J. Lynn, and R. D. Stulting, “Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery,” Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Huseynli, J. Salgado-Borges, and J. L. Alio, “Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 521–534, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. Miháltz, I. Kovács, Á. Takács, and Z. Z. Nagy, “Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam,” Cornea, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 976–980, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Z. Schlegel, T. Hoang-Xuan, and D. Gatinel, “Comparison of and correlation between anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps in normal eyes and keratoconus-suspect eyes,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 789–795, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Sideroudi, G. Labiris, A. Giarmoukakis, N. Bougatsou, and V. Kozobolis, “Contribution of reference bodies in diagnosis of keratoconus,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 676–681, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. I. Kovács, K. Miháltz, M. Ecsedy, J. Németh, and Z. Z. Nagy, “The role of reference body selection in calculating posterior corneal elevation and prediction of keratoconus using rotating Scheimpflug camera,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. e251–e256, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Smadja, M. R. Santhiago, G. R. Mello, R. R. Krueger, J. Colin, and D. Touboul, “Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 274–281, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. M. Mostafa, “Comparison between corneal elevation maps using different reference surfaces with Scheimpflug-Placido topographer,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 553–558, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Gilani, M. Cortese, R. R. Ambrósio Jr. et al., “Comprehensive anterior segment normal values generated by rotating Scheimpflug tomography,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1707–1712, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. T. Kim, M. Cortese, M. W. Belin, R. Ambrosio Jr., and S. S. Khachikian, “Tomographic normal values for corneal elevation and pachymetry in a hyperopic population,” Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 130, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. A. P. Gomes, D. Tan, C. J. Rapuano et al., “Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases,” Cornea, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 359–369, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Ambrósio Jr., R. S. Alonso, A. Luz, and L. G. C. Velarde, “Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1851–1859, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Ambrósio Jr., A. L. C. Caiado, F. P. Guerra et al., “Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 753–758, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. S. Rabinowitz and P. J. McDonnell, “Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 400–408, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Hashemi, S. Heydarian, A. Yekta et al., “High prevalence and familial aggregation of keratoconus in an Iranian rural population: a population-based study,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 447–455, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. N. Gorskova and E. N. Sevost’ianov, “Epidemiology of keratoconus in the Urals,” Vestnik Oftalmologii, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 38–40, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. H. Kennedy, W. M. Bourne, and J. A. Dyer, “A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 267–273, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Hori-Komai, I. Toda, N. Asano-Kato, and K. Tsubota, “Reasons for not performing refractive surgery,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 795–797, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. A. Althomali, I. M. Al-Qurashi, S. M. Al-Thagafi, A. Mohammed, and M. Almalki, “Prevalence of keratoconus among patients seeking laser vision correction in Taif area of Saudi Arabia,” Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 114–118, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. M. Al-Amri, “Prevalence of keratoconus in a refractive surgery population,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2018, Article ID 5983530, 5 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. J. Corcoran, “Macroeconomic landscape of refractive surgery in the United States,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 249–254, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. S. Rad, M. Jabbarvand, and N. Saifi, “Progressive keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. S718–S722, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  30. I. G. Pallikaris, G. D. Kymionis, and N. I. Astyrakakis, “Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1796–1802, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. W. Belin, D. Litoff, S. J. Strods, S. S. Winn, and R. S. Smith, “The PAR technology corneal topography system,” Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 88–96, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  32. K. Kamiya, R. Ishii, K. Shimizu, and A. Igarashi, “Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 459–463, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. B. Michael, S. K. Stephe, and R. Ambrosio Jr., Elevation Based Corneal Tomography, Jaypee Highlights, Panama City, Panama, 2012.
  34. P. Benes, S. Synek, and S. Petrova, “Corneal shape and eccentricity in population,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  35. S. S. Khachikian and M. W. Belin, “Posterior elevation in keratoconus,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 4, p. 816.e1, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. P. Kosekahya, M. Koc, M. Caglayan, H. Kiziltoprak, C. U. Atilgan, and P. Yilmazbas, “Repeatability and reliability of ectasia display and topometric indices with the Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconic eyes,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Ambrósio Jr., B. T. Lopes, F. Faria-Correia et al., “Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 434–443, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Steinberg, M. Siebert, T. Katz et al., “Tomographic and biomechanical Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus characterization: a validation of current indices,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 840–847, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M.-R. Sedaghat, H. Momeni-Moghaddam, R. Ambrósio Jr. et al., “Diagnostic ability of corneal shape and biomechanical parameters for detecting frank keratoconus,” Cornea, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1025–1034, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. C. Y. Chan, Y. M. Wang, M. Yu, and V. Jhanji, “Comparison of corneal tomography and a new combined tomographic biomechanical index in subclinical keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 616–621, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Y. M. Wang, T. C. Y. Chan, M. Yu, and V. Jhanji, “Comparison of corneal dynamic and tomographic analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and keratoconic eyes,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 632–638, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. C. Chan, Y. M. Wang, M. Yu, and V. Jhanji, “Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus