Research Article
Clinical Performance of the Spot Vision Photo Screener before and after Induction of Cycloplegia in Children
Table 4
Comparison of previous studies to current study of Spot Screener in detecting ARFs accordingly to 2013 AAOPS criteria.
| | Study | Device | Age | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Compared with |
| | Peterseim | Spot (v2.0.16) | 11–221 | 84.8 | 70.9 | 78.1 | 79.2 | CR | | Arana | Spot (v2.0.16) | 20–119 | 92.6 | 90.6 | 58.1 | 98.9 | CR | | Forcina | Spot (v2.0.16) | 6–35 | 89.8 | 70.4 | 58.9 | 93.6 | CR | | Marzolf | Spot (2.1.4) | 26.4–110.4 | 84 | 62 | 58 | 86 | CR | | Mu | Spot (version missing) | 48–84 | 94.79 | 85 | — | — | CR | | Qian | Spot (v 2.1.4) | 48–72 | 94 | 80 | — | — | CR | | Current study | Spot (v3.0.04.06) | 36–120 | 60.9 | 94.9 | 75.7 | 90.4 | CA | | Spot cycloplegic | 36–120 | 85.3 | 87.4 | 63.6 | 95.8 | CA |
|
|
Age: months; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; CR: cycloplegic retinoscopy; CA: cycloplegic autorefractometer.
|
