Review Article

Plication versus Resection in Horizontal Strabismus Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Table 5

Odds ratio for undercorrection.

StudyOR95% CI% weight

Kimura and Kimura [16]0.760.33–1.77
Wang et al. [17]0.910.31–2.70
Alkharashi and Hunter [11]79.224.38–1.433,38
Huston and Hoover [19]0.620.13–2.85
Huston and Hoover [19]0.930.06–15.65
Lee and Kim [20]2.031.07–3.86
Sukhija and Kaur [18](1)
Combined OR (Mantel-Haenszel)1.360.59–3.16
Kimura and Kimura [16]0.7640.330–1.76627.96
Wang et al. [17]0.9090.306–2.70024.35
Alkharashi and Hunter [11]79.2224.379–1433.3828.32
Huston and Hoover [19]0.9330.056–15.6478.67
Lee and Kim [20]2.0291.067–3.85730.69
Sukhija and Kaur [18](Excluded)
D + L pooled OR1.6100.620–3.857100.00

OR (95% CI)–Odds ratio (95% Confidence interval). (1) It was not possible to estimate OR-100,0% had success in both groups. Heterogeneity test–Chi (5) = 13.20 (). I2 = 62.1%. Global test–t(5) = 0.74 (). Heterogeneity chi-squared = 12.13 (d.f. = 4) , I-squared (variation in OR attributable to heterogeneity) = 67.0%, Estimate of between-study variance Tau-squared = 0.6647, Test of OR = 1: t(4) = 0.98 Prob > |t| = 0.382.