Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients

Table 1

Comparison of various test parameters for Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF) and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) standard program.

Test parameter	MRF (mean ± SD)	HFA 24-2 SITA standard (mean ± SD)
MD (dB)	−8.61 ± 7.21	−11.71 ± 9.36	<0.001^‡
PSD (dB)	9.09 ± 3.57	7.68 ± 4.19	0.005^‡
VC (for MRF)/VFI (for HFA) (%)	70.63 ± 24.56	68.43 ± 27.08	0.096
Foveal threshold (dB)^†	25.18 ± 7.01	34.43 ± 3.17	<0.001^‡
Test time (seconds)^†	342.07 ± 56.70	375.11 ± 88.95	0.046^§
Depressed points with on PSD probability plot (n)	21.61 ± 12.86	27.61 ± 14.51	<0.001^‡

MD = mean deviation, PSD = pattern standard deviation, VC = visual capacity, VFI = visual field index, MRF = Melbourne rapid fields, HFA = Humphrey field analyzer, SITA = Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm, SD = standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed rank test analysis. ^†Paired t-test analysis. ^‡Highly significant with level of significance: . ^§Significant with level of significance: at 95.0% confidence limit.