Clinical Study

Comparison between Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane Graft in Treating Challenging Cases with Macular Hole and Macular Hole Retinal Detachment

Table 2

Comparison between clinical data of two types of human amniotic membrane graft.

Type of hAMCryopreservedDehydrated value

Number of cases107
Sex (M : F)6 : 43 : 4
Age (y/o)61.70 ± 10.7262.57 ± 9.690.87
Axial length (mm)27.83 ± 3.3227.93 ± 3.700.95
Size of MH (μm)1229.30 ± 774.54847.57 ± 427.690.26
Sealed MH (%)8 (80%)5 (71%)0.68
Visual gain (logMAR)0.19 ± 0.370.15 ± 0.410.85

One patient received cryopreserved hAM graft for MH, and dehydrated hAM graft for extramacular hole was enrolled in the cryopreserved group. M: male; F: female; y/o: year-old; MH: macular hole.