Research Article

Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy: Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Twenty-Four Cases

Table 3

Demographic and clinical data of all subjects.

Case no.Age (y)/sexBCVACyclorefractionArden ratioERGThick choroidRetinal schisis unrelated to CNV/involved layersSubretinal hyporeflective space in fovea in OCTACG treatmentCNVFine peripheral leakage in FAGenetically proven

120/F2/10
1/10
+2.00–2.5 × 100
+3.00–2.5  × 75
101
107
NLOUOU/INL > ONLOU+(Surgical PI OU/TBX OU × 2/AGV OD)
227/M6/10
8/10
+2.00–1.00 × 90
+2.50–1.50 × 85
112
113
NLOUOU/INLOU+Zilomole-brimonidine-latanoprost OU/laser PI OUOD, IVB × 1
325/M5/10
2/10
−0.5−0.5  × 180
P−0.75 × 30
118
115
NLOU/INLOUOU, IVB × 3
412/F7/10
3/10
+4.5–0.5  × 50
+5.00–0.5  × 110
102
102
NLOUOU/INLOU- (Subfoveal scar in OS compatible with fibrotic pillar)+
514/M5/10
5/10
P-0.75  × 10
+0.50–1.5 × 90
111
107
NL_OU/INLOU-(Old subfoveal scar in OD)
611/F6/10
4/10
+4.75–0.25 × 90
+5.75–0.5 × 90
107
102
NLOU/severeOU/INL > ONLOU
76.5/F8/1
4/10
+7.5–1.00  × 30
+7.251.00 × 150
NA due to poor cooperationNLOUOU/ INL > ONLOUNA
816/F4/10
7/10
+1.00–1.00 × 5
+1.25–0.75 × 175
103
103
Mildly reduced photopic and scotopic responsesOU, severeOU/INLOU
930/M1/10
3/10
+1.00
+1.00–0.5  × 180
168
170
Moderately reduced photopic responsesOU/INL, ONL
CME like pattern
+
1034/M5/10
6/10
+2.75–0.5 × 90
+2.25–0.75× 90
113
108
NLOU
1110/F7/10
6/10
+2.75–0.5  × 180
+2.5–1.00 × 180
101
103
NLOU, INLOU+
1233/M6/10
5/10
+1.75–1.25 × 10
+2.00–0.75 × 170
103
107
NLOUOU, INLOU
1335/F6/10
6/100
+2.75
+1.00
111
106
NLOU, severeOU, INL > ONLOU+ (Laser PI, OU/cataract surgery OU/ zilomole-brimonidine-latanoprost OU)
144/MPoor cooperation+5.00–1.5 × 20
+5.5–0.75 × 180
NA due to poor cooperationNANAOU, INLOU-(OS: subfoveal fibrosis)NA
157/M1/10
7/10
+4.75
+4.5–0.5 × 180
NA due to poor cooperationNAOUOU/INL, ONLOU_ ((Subfoveal scar in OD compatible with fibrotic pillar)NA
1614/F8/10
8/10
+4.75–0.75 × 180
+4.00
NA due to poor cooperationMildly reduced responsesOUOU/INL, ONLOUNA
1732/M2/10
2/10
+2.75–0.75 × 180
+2.50
108
112
NLOU, severeOU/INL, ONLOU+ (OU/latanoprost)++
1828/F10/10
6/10
+1.5–0.25 × 60
+1.50
132
115
Mildly reduced responsesOU, severeOU/INL, ONLOU+ (OU/laser PI)++
1926/F5/10
10/10
+0.75–1.25×10
+0.5–0.75×180
176
189
Near-normal responsesOUOU/INL, ONLOU++
207/F6/10
6/10
+5.75–1.25 × 10
+5.75–1 × 170
NA due to poor cooperationNLOU, severeOU. INLOUNA+
2112/M2/10
4/10
+3.50–3.00 × 170
+2.75–2.00 × 170
110
124
NLOUOU/INL, ONLOU_ (Subfoveal scar in OD compatible with fibrotic pillar)+
225/F7/10
6/10
+4.5
+4.25–0.75 × 60
NA due to poor cooperationNLOUOU, INLOUNA+
2311/F7/10
5/10
+3.50–3.00 × 180
+2.75–1.25 × 180
121
117
NLOUOU/INL, ONLOU+ (OU/timolol)+
2427/M5/10
5/10
+1.50–0.75 × 180
+1.5–0.5 × 180
108
105
Mildly reduced responsesOUOU/INL, ONLOU+

BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; OU: both eyes; ACG: angle-closure glaucoma; PI: peripheral iridotomy; TBX: trabeculectomy; IOP: intraocular pressure; OCT: optical coherence tomography; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; CME: cystoid macular edema; FA: fluorescein angiography; ERG: electroretinogram; NL: normal; NA: not available; F: female; M: male; CNV: choroidal neovascularization.