Research Article
Acceptability and Feasibility of an Evidence-Based Requisition for Bone Mineral Density Testing in Clinical Practice
Table 1
Characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristic | RUR before use | RUR after use | | | (%) | (%) |
| Gender | | | Female | 16 (62) | 10 (67) | Age (years) | | | 20–30 | 4 (15) | 3 (20) | 31–40 | 9 (35) | 6 (40) | 41–50 | 3 (12) | 2 (13) | 51–60 | 8 (31) | 4 (27) | ≥61 | 2 (8) | 0 (0) | Practice setting | | | Urban | 18 (69) | 13 (87) | Rural | 5 (19) | 1 (7) | Urban/rural | 3 (12) | 1 (7) | Type of practice | | | Group | 20 (77) | 12 (80) | Family Health Team (FHT) | 5 (19) | 2 (13) | Solo | 1 (4) | 1 (7) | Payment model | | | Family Health Organization | 20 (77) | 12 (80) | Family Health Group | 3 (12) | 3 (20) | Other (e.g., salary, FHT, NP) | 1 (4) | 0 (0) | Comprehensive Care Model | 2 (8) | 0 (0) | Fee-for-Service | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | Size of practice or roster | | | <500 | 4 (15) | 1 (7) | 500–800 | 5 (19) | 2 (13) | 800–1000 | 4 (15) | 3 (20) | 1000–1500 | 12 (46) | 8 (53) | >1500 | 1 (4) | 1 (7) | Resident | | | No | 18 (69) | 11 (73) | Yes | 7 (27) | 4 (27) | Nurse practitioner | 1 (4) | 0 (0) | Time since residency (range, years) | 0–40 | 0–33 |
|
|