Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2011, Article ID 517614, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/517614
Research Article

Comparison of Naturally Conceived and IVF-DZ Twins in the Netherlands Twin Registry: A Developmental Study

Department of Biological Psychology, VU University, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 14 July 2011; Accepted 11 August 2011

Academic Editor: Ariel Zosmer

Copyright © 2011 Catharina E. M. van Beijsterveldt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. A. M. Kremer, W. Beekhuizen, R. S. G. M. Bots et al., “The results of in vitro fertilisation in the Netherlands, 1996–2000,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 146, no. 49, pp. 2358–2363, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. A. M. Kremer, R. S. G. M. Bots, B. Cohlen et al., “Ten years of results of in-vitro fertilisation in the Netherlands 1996–2005,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 146–152, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. C.W. Scholtes, A. P. Schmoutziguer, and G. H. Zeilmaker, “Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, a substantial improvement in the treatment of male infertility,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 139, no. 11, pp. 554–558, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  4. E. J. De Boer, F. E. van Leeuwen, I. Den Tonkelaar, C. A. M. Jansen, D. D. M. Braat, and C. W. Burger, “Methods and results of in-vitro fertilisation in the Netherlands in the years 1983–1994,” Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, vol. 148, no. 29, pp. 1448–1455, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. K. Ludwig, A. G. Sutcliffe, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig, “Post-neonatal health and development of children born after assisted reproduction: a systematic review of controlled studies,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 3–25, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Voigt, N. Rochow, M. Zygmunt, S. Straube, K. T. M. Schneider, and V. Briese, “Risks of pregnancy and birth, birth presentation, and mode of delivery in relation to the age of primiparous women,” Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie, vol. 212, no. 6, pp. 206–210, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. V. Glinianaia, M. A. Obeysekera, S. Sturgiss, and R. Bell, “Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2549–2557, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. H. Verstraelen, S. Goetgeluk, C. Derom et al., “Preterm birth in twins after subfertility treatment: population based cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 331, no. 7526, pp. 1173–1176, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. B. Lambalk and M. van Hooff, “Natural versus induced twinning and pregnancy outcome: a Dutch nationwide survey of primiparous dizygotic twin deliveries,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 731–736, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. Källén, O. Finnström, A. Lindam, E. Nilsson, K. G. Nygren, and P. O. Olausson, “Selected neonatal outcomes in dizygotic twins after IVF versus non-IVF pregnancies,” BJOG, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 676–682, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Joy, N. McClure, and I. E. Cooke, “A comparison of spontaneously conceived twins and twins conceived by artificial reproductive technologies,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 580–585, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Vasario, V. Borgarello, C. Bossotti et al., “IVF twins have similar obstetric and neonatal outcome as spontaneously conceived twins: a prospective follow-up study,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 422–428, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Yang, Y. S. Choi, K. H. Nam, J. Y. Kwon, Y. W. Park, and Y. H. Kim, “Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies according to methods of conception: spontaneous versus in-vitro fertilization,” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. D. McDonald, Z. Han, S. Mulla, A. Ohlsson, J. Beyene, and K. E. Murphy, “Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 105–113, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. K. J. Middelburg, M. J. Heineman, A. F. Bos, and M. Hadders-Algra, “Neuromotor, cognitive, language and behavioural outcome in children born following IVF or ICSI—a systematic review,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 219–231, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Wagenaar, J. Huisman, P. T. Cohen-Kettenis, and H. Adelemarre-van De Waal, “An overview of studies on early development, cognition, and psychosocial well-being in children born after in vitro fertilization,” Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 219–230, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. H. Colpin and S. Soenen, “Parenting and psychosocial development of IVF children: a follow-up study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1116–1123, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Colpin, A. De Munter, K. Nys, and L. Vandemeulebroecke, “Parenting stress and psychosocial well-being among parents with twins conceived naturally or by reproductive technology,” Human Reproduction, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 3133–3137, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Olivennes, S. Golombok, C. Ramogida, and J. Rust, “Behavioral and cognitive development as well as family functioning of twins conceived by assisted reproduction: findings from a large population study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 725–733, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. van Balen, “Child-rearing following in vitro fertilization,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 687–693, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Ceelen, M. M. van Weissenbruch, J. P. W. Vermeiden, F. E. van Leeuwen, and H. A. Delemarre-van de Waal, “Growth and development of children born after in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1662–1673, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Ceelen, M. M. van Weissenbruch, J. Prein et al., “Growth during infancy and early childhood in relation to blood pressure and body fat measures at age 8-18 years of IVF children and spontaneously conceived controls born to subfertile parents,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2788–2795, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Koivurova, A. L. Hartikainen, U. Sovio, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, and M. R. Järvelin, “Growth, psychomotor development and morbidity up to 3 years of age in children born after IVF,” Human Reproduction, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2328–2336, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. M. Brandes, A. Scher, J. Itzkovits, I. Thaler, M. Sarid, and R. Gershoni-Baruch, “Growth and development of children conceived by in vitro fertilization,” Pediatrics, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 424–429, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Ceelen, M. M. van Weissenbruch, J. C. Roos, J. P. W. Vermeiden, F. E. van Leeuwen, and H. A. Delemarre-van De Waal, “Body composition in children and adolescents born after in vitro fertilization or spontaneous conception,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 3417–3423, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Knoester, F. M. Helmerhorst, J. P. Vandenbroucke, L. A. J. van der Westerlaken, F. J. Walther, and S. Veen, “Perinatal outcome, health, growth, and medical care utilization of 5- to 8-year-old intracytoplasmic sperm injection singletons,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1133–1146, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, M. Bonduelle, J. Barnes et al., “International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments,” Pediatrics, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. e283–e289, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Ludwig, A. Katalinic, U. Thyen, A. G. Sutcliffe, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig, “Neuromotor development and mental health at 5.5 years of age of singletons born at term after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection ICSI: results of a prospective controlled single-blinded study in Germany,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 125–132, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Leunens, S. Celestin-Westreich, M. Bonduelle, I. Liebaers, and I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, “Cognitive and motor development of 8-year-old children born after ICSI compared to spontaneously conceived children,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2922–2929, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Knoester, J. P. Vandenbroucke, F. M. Helmerhorst, L. A. J. van der Westerlaken, F. J. Walther, and S. Veen, “Matched follow-up study of 5–8 year old ICSI-singletons: comparison of their neuromotor development to IVF and naturally conceived singletons,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1638–1646, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Barnes, A. G. Sutcliffe, I. Kristoffersen et al., “The influence of assisted reproduction on family functioning and children's socio-emotional development: results from a European study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1480–1487, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Jongbloed-Pereboom, K. J. Middelburg, M. J. Heineman, A. F. Bos, and M. Hadders-Algra, “The Groningen assisted reproductive technologies cohort study: developmental status and behavior at 2 years,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 2283–2289, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Knoester, F. M. Helmerhorst, L. A. J. van der Westerlaken, F. J. Walther, and S. Veen, “Matched follow-up study of 5–8-year-old ICSI singletons: child behaviour, parenting stress and child (health-related) quality of life,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 3098–3107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Wagenaar, M. M. van Weissenbruch, D. L. Knol, P. T. Cohen-Kettenis, H. A. Delemarre-van de Waal, and J. Huisman, “Behavior and socioemotional functioning in 9-18-year-old children born after in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1907–1914, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Wagenaar, M. M. van Weissenbruch, F. E. van Leeuwen et al., “Self-reported behavioral and socioemotional functioning of 11- to 18-year-old adolescents conceived by in vitro fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 611–616, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. A. Tully, T. E. Moffitt, and A. Caspi, “Maternal adjustment, parenting and child behaviour in families of school-aged twins conceived after IVF and ovulation induction,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 316–325, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. Bartels, C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt, E. M. Derks et al., “Young Netherlands Twin Register (Y-NTR): a longitudinal multiple informant study of problem behavior,” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. I. Boomsma, E. J. C. De Geus, J. M. Vink et al., “Netherlands Twin Register: from twins to twin families,” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 849–857, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. I. Boomsma, J. M. Vink, T. C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt et al., “Netherlands Twin Register: a focus on longitudinal research,” Twin Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 401–406, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. J. H. Rietveld, J. C. van der Valk, I. L. Bongers, T. M. Stroet, P. E. Slagboom, and D. I. Boomsma, “Zygosity diagnosis in young twins by parental report,” Twin Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 134–141, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. Hoekstra, G. Willemsen, T. C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt, G. W. Montgomery, and D. I. Boomsma, “Familial twinning and fertility in Dutch mothers of twins,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 146, no. 24, pp. 3147–3156, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. E. M. T. van Beijsterveldt, C. Hoekstra, R. Schats, G. W. Montgomery, G. Willemsen, and D. I. Boomsma, “Mode of conception of twin pregnancies: willingness to reply to survey items and comparison of survey data to hospital records,” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 349–351, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. M. Langendonk, C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt, S. I. Brouwer, T. Stroet, J. J. Hudziak, and D. I. Boomsma, “Assessment of motor milestones in twins,” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 835–839, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. I. Brouwer, T. C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt, M. Bartels, J. J. Hudziak, and D. I. Boomsma, “Influences on achieving motor milestones: a twin-singleton study,” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 424–430, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. T. M. Achenbach, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3 and 1992 Profile, University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, Vt, USA, 1992.
  46. H. M. Koot, E. J. C. G. van Den Oord, F. C. Verhulst, and D. I. Boomsma, “Behavioral and emotional problems in young preschoolers: cross-cultural testing of the validity of the child behavior checklist/2-3,” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 183–196, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. M. Achenbach, Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile, University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, Vt, USA, 1991.
  48. T. M. Achenbach, Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1911 Profile, University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, Burlington, Vt, USA, 1996.
  49. A. M. Fredriks, S. van Buuren, J. M. Wit, and S. P. Verloove-Vanhorick, “Body index measurements in 1996-7 compared with 1980,” Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 107–112, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. M. Fredriks, S. van Buuren, R. J. F. Burgmeijer et al., “Continuing positive secular growth change in the Netherlands 1955–1997,” Pediatric Research, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 316–323, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. SPSS, SPSS Advanced Models 12.0, SPSS, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2003.
  52. O. Shebl, T. Ebner, A. Sir, M. Sommergruber, and G. Tews, “The role of mode of conception in the outcome of twin pregnancies,” Minerva Ginecologica, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. A. McMahon, J. A. Ungerer, J. Beaurepaire, C. Tennant, and D. Saunders, “Anxiety during pregnancy and fetal attachment after in-vitro fertilization conception,” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 176–182, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. G. F. Estourgie-van Burk, M. Bartels, D. I. Boomsma, and H. A. Delemarre-van de Waal, “Body size of twins compared with siblings and the general population: from birth to late adolescence,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 156, no. 4, pp. 586–591, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. Golombok, A. Brewaeys, R. Cook et al., “The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2324–2331, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. Raj and R. Morley, ““Are you asking me if we had sex to conceive?” To whom do parents of twins disclose mode of conception and what do they feel about being asked?” Twin Research and Human Genetics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 886–891, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. Knoester, F. M. Helmerhorst, J. P. Vandenbroucke, L. A. J. van der Westerlaken, F. J. Walther, and S. Veen, “Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 289–296, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Pinborg, A. Loft, and A. N. Andersen, “Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 8602 children born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the role of twin pregnancy,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 1071–1078, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar