Journal of Pregnancy

Journal of Pregnancy / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 646345 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/646345

Viltė Daugirdaitė, Olga van den Akker, Satvinder Purewal, "Posttraumatic Stress and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder after Termination of Pregnancy and Reproductive Loss: A Systematic Review", Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2015, Article ID 646345, 14 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/646345

Posttraumatic Stress and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder after Termination of Pregnancy and Reproductive Loss: A Systematic Review

Academic Editor: Gian Carlo Di Renzo
Received14 Jul 2014
Accepted20 Jan 2015
Published05 Feb 2015

Abstract

Objective. The aims of this systematic review were to integrate the research on posttraumatic stress (PTS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after termination of pregnancy (TOP), miscarriage, perinatal death, stillbirth, neonatal death, and failed in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Methods. Electronic databases (AMED, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, PubMEd, ScienceDirect) were searched for articles using PRISMA guidelines. Results. Data from 48 studies were included. Quality of the research was generally good. PTS/PTSD has been investigated in TOP and miscarriage more than perinatal loss, stillbirth, and neonatal death. In all reproductive losses and TOPs, the prevalence of PTS was greater than PTSD, both decreased over time, and longer gestational age is associated with higher levels of PTS/PTSD. Women have generally reported more PTS or PTSD than men. Sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., younger age, lower education, and history of previous traumas or mental health problems) and psychsocial factors influence PTS and PTSD after TOP and reproductive loss. Conclusions. This systematic review is the first to investigate PTS/PTSD after reproductive loss. Patients with advanced pregnancies, a history of previous traumas, mental health problems, and adverse psychosocial profiles should be considered as high risk for developing PTS or PTSD following reproductive loss.

1. Introduction

Posttraumatic stress (PTS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after reproductive loss have not been well recognised, despite the growing documentation of adverse psychological states associated with reproductive losses. Our focus is on PTS and PTSD but did not include acute stress disorder (ASD) because ASD is a separate disorder diagnosed only in the first month following the traumatic event. Although the classification of TOP and reproductive loss varies from country to country [1], TOP broadly refers to the termination of a clinical pregnancy and miscarriage to the spontaneous loss of a clinical pregnancy before 20 completed weeks of gestation. Perinatal death, on the other hand, refers to a fetal or neonatal death after 20+ weeks during pregnancy and childbirth or up to 7 days after birth, whereas stillbirth denotes the death of a (20+ weeks of gestational age) baby before the complete expulsion/extraction from its mother. A neonatal death is said to have occurred when a live born baby dies within 28 days of birth [2]. Failed in vitro fertilisation (IVF) is also considered by some infertile couples as a reproductive loss [3], with some women reporting grief, sadness, and distress with IVF failures [4, 5] and, for those who do become pregnant, a more intense protective attachment to their fetus [6]. PTS and PTSD can evolve after any of these reproductive losses [710].

Further, TOP is different from other reproductive losses as it involves a “choice” of the woman to terminate a pregnancy or not, but the event itself is a stressful situation and can become traumatic for some women [11]. It is also important to separate nonmedical TOP (which is usually requested for social reasons) from medical TOP, which is usually requested when there is evidence of foetal abnormality which could lead to giving birth to a baby unlikely to survive long, or when the difficulties of rearing an affected child are perceived as too great to be acceptable to the couple [12]. The differences between medical and nonmedical TOP are further highlighted in societal/cultural acceptance and legal status. For instance, many African or Latin American countries will not allow nonmedical TOPs [13], although the World Health Organisation [14] reported that highly restrictive abortion laws did not lower TOP rates, stigmatising this illegal practice further. Specifically, the abortion rate is 29 per 1,000 women of childbearing age in Africa (where TOP is illegal under most circumstances in most countries) compared with 12 per 1000 in Western Europe (where abortion is permitted in many countries). Nonmedical TOP may not be recognized as a traumatic event by some women because they do not want the baby [15]. However, some of these women subsequently regret having had the abortion and can experience it as trauma [16]. Not all women experiencing a nonmedical TOP will experience posttraumatic consequences [17] but that is also true for medical TOP and all other reproductive losses. Nonetheless the psychological impact of nonmedical and medical TOP may be different, but the extent to which they differ needs further investigation.

Although mental health promotion following reproductive loss is underinvestigated [18], PTSD after childbirth and pregnancy loss has been distinguished from postnatal depression and complicated grief [19, 20]. Studies which have investigated PTS and/or PTSD following reproductive loss and TOP have reported mixed results [13, 21]. For example, high levels of PTSD following nonmedical TOP have been reported by some [22] but not all previous research [23]. At present, there is no systematically pooled research evidence on PTS and its disorder after TOP and reproductive loss. The rationale for this systematic review is therefore to reconcile previous research and deliver the first review that integrates research on PTS and PTSD after all reproductive losses (TOP, miscarriage, perinatal loss, stillbirth, neonatal death, and failed IVF) for women and men and investigate the prevalence and factors influencing the development of PTS/PTSD after each reproductive loss. TOP and other reproductive losses were included to provide a comprehensive account of the research literature, including a quality assessment and a direct examination of the differences between TOPS and reproductive losses in relation to PTS and PTSD.

2. Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

The electronic databases (AMED, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, PubMEd, and ScienceDirect) were searched for relevant articles and followed the PRISMA guidelines [24]. No restriction for time of publication was set and only English language peer-reviewed publications were included. The search was last updated in May 2012. In PubMEd, the following key words were used in title/abstract search: “miscarriage” or “stillbirth” or “abortion” or “neonatal death” or “perinatal loss” or “failed IVF” or “failed in vitro fertilization” or “failed in vitro fertilization” or “pregnancy loss” or “termination of pregnancy” and “trauma” or “stress” or “PTSD” or “posttraumatic stress,” or “posttraumatic stress disorder.”

2.2. Study Selection

All papers had to be published in peer-reviewed journals, available in English and presenting original data. Studies were selected if they investigated PTSD/PTS associated with TOP and/or other reproductive losses (miscarriage, perinatal loss, stillbirth, neonatal death, and failed IVF). Quantitative studies were selected if they used standardised measurements of PTS/PTSD and qualitative studies were selected if they investigated the trauma of TOP and reproductive loss in the interviews. Studies had to use standard criteria for PTS/PTSD to be included. For PTS the reaction to traumatic events is characterised with involuntary repetition in thought, emotion, and behaviour of stress relevant contents. PTS is a marker of possibly developing the disorder, which depends on the intensity of these and other symptoms and require other conditions to become a disorder [25]. We did not include ASD in our systematic review because ASD does not necessarily lead to PTSD and is more time limited. Further, PTSD (PTS’s disorder) is the development of characteristic symptoms following exposure to an extreme traumatic stressor. The characteristic symptoms resulting from the exposure to the extreme trauma include persistent reexperiencing of the traumatic event, persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma and numbing of general responsiveness, and persistent symptoms of increased arousal [26].

Studies which investigated existing PTS/PTSD as a risk factor for TOP or reproductive loss were excluded because the focus was on reproductive loss as a risk factor for PTS/PTSD. Further, data were collected on whether the studies included controlled for pre-TOP or prereproductive loss of mental health in their data analyses. Clinical case studies with no research agenda, books, correspondence letters, discussions, book reviews, product reviews, editorials, publisher’s notes, and errata were excluded from the review. To avoid multiple publication bias [27] only one paper was selected from multiple publications and selection was based upon highest quality, followed by largest number of participants, highest number of reproductive losses, longest length of follow-up, and the paper with most reported outcome measurement data. Numbers included and reasons for exclusion are shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Data Abstraction

A data extraction sheet was used to collect relevant information. This included author’s details, country of study, design, sample size, variables measured, results, quality of study evaluation. Data was extracted from relevant articles (VD) and cross-checked (OvdA and SP).

2.4. Screening and Quality Assessment

Quality assessment of articles which met the inclusion criteria was determined by VD using Cochrane criteria adapted by Green et al. [28]. These were independently checked by OvdA and SP, and disagreements were resolved following discussion; criteria were(i)adequate sample size,(ii)representative of study population,(iii)high response rate,(iv)using mostly validated measures,(v)mostly appropriate timing of measures,(vi)measures consistent with aims,(vii)conclusions consistent with results,(viii)methodology is clear,(ix)analysis is clear.

3. Results

As can be seen from the PRISMA flow chart (Figure 1), the search of the databases yielded 8794 titles of records and 14 records from searching reference lists. After duplicates were removed, 7912 records were left. Titles were reviewed and 7309 articles did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the 603 abstracts reviewed, 461 failed to meet the inclusion criteria. Finally full texts of the remaining 142 papers were read and 48 studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. As shown in Figure 1, 23 studies [2951] were excluded for reporting overlapping data and 12 studies [22, 23, 5261] from multiple reports were included. Further, one eligible study was removed [62] over serious reported methodological and statistical concerns over the study [63].

3.1. Study Characteristics

The study characteristics of the 48 included articles are shown in Tables 14; Table 1 includes TOP, Table 2 miscarriage, Table 3 perinatal loss, and Table 4 stillbirths. Each table is separated in two parts (a and b) with section a representing studies which have investigated the type of reproductive loss alone and section (b) presenting studies which have investigated that type with other losses.


Authors, year, country, and author listing in reference listMethodsReproductive loss, Participants, and control for Prereproductive lossOutcomes measurementsQuality

(a) Termination of pregnancy (TOP). Numbers of participants are women, men, or couples and are noted separately.

(1) Allanson (2007), Australia [64]P, LNonmedical TOP = 96
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(2) Cohen and Roth (1984), USA [65]PNonmedical TOP = 55
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
IES

(3) Coyle et al. (2010) USA [22]
Note. This study was chosen over [32]; it had larger number of reported participants.
RNonmedical TOP 374 women; 198 men
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version

(4) Davies et al. (2005), UK [79]PMedical TOP 30;
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(5) van Emmerik et al. (2008), The Netherlands [66]PNonmedical TOP 67
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(6) Hemmerling et al. (2005), Germany [67]P, INonmedical TOP 219
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(7) Kelly et al. UK (2010) [68]P, INonmedical TOP 122
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
IES

(8) Kersting et al. (2009), Germany [58]
Note. This study was chosen over [41] because of a higher quality rating and [42] because it reports more participants and relevant data.
P, L62 medical TOP; 43 preterm birth; 65 spontaneous delivery
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES-R

(9) Korenromp et al. (2005a), The Netherlands [59]
Note. This study was chosen over [43] because of higher quality rating.
RMedical TOP 196
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(10) Korenromp et al. (2007), The Netherlands [60]
Note. This study was chosen over [44] because of a larger sample.
P, LMedical TOP 217 women; 169 men
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(11) Layer et al. (2004), USA [69]P, INonmedical TOP 35
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(12) Major et al. (2000), USA [23]
Notes. This study was chosen over [45] because it reported more data.
P, LNonmedical TOP 442
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled for PTSD
Adapted PTSD measure-using DSM-III-R-used with Vietnam War veterans

(13) Mufel et al. (2002), Belarus, USA [61]
Note. This study was chosen over  [475 ] because of a higher quality rating.
RNonmedical TOP 150
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES-R

(14) Pope et al. (2001), USA [70]PNonmedical TOP 96
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled for PTS
IES

(15) Rousset et al. (2012), France [71] P, INonmedical TOP 70
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES-R

(16) Rue et al. (2004), USA [72]RNonmedical TOP 331 Russian women; 217 American women
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
Institute of Pregnancy Loss questionnaire-including criteria for PTSD on DSM-IV

(17) Slade et al. (1998), UK [73]P, INonmedical TOP 275
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled for PTS
IES

(18) Suliman et al. (2007), South Africa [74]P, INonmedical TOP 151
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
Clinician-administered PTSD scale (CAPS-I)

(19) Trybulski (2006), USA [75]QNonmedical TOP 16 Qualitative interview.

(20) Walters and Oakley (2002), UK [76]CSNonmedical TOP 1
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
The Post-Traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale

(b) TOP and miscarriage/perinatal loss/neonatal death

(21) Broen et al. (2005b), Norway [53]
Note. This study was chosen over [31]; it has a higher quality rating/longer follow-up time [30].
P, L40 miscarriages; 80 Nonmedical TOP
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
IES

(22) Canário et al. (2011), Portugal [77]PNonmedical TOP (30); medical TOP (10); miscarriage (10).
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES-R

(23) Cowchock et al. (2011), USA [78]P7 medical TOP, 8 miscarriages
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(24) Fernandez et al. (2011), Canada [80]Q2 medical TOP; 5 miscarriages Qualitative interviews

(25) Hamama et al. (2010), USA [55]
Note. This study was chosen over [46] because of more relevant PTSD data.
P405 prior pregnancies; 221 prior nonmedical TOP; 206 miscarriages; 22 reported both
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
Interview (National Women’s Study PTSD Module (NWS-PTSD)).

(26) Kroth et al. (2004), USA [81]RMedical TOP, miscarriage, perinatal loss, and neonatal death 37 women
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(27) Salvesen et al. (1997), Norway [82]P24 medical TOP, 29 perinatal losses/neonatal deaths
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

Notes: CS = case study; I = intervention design; IES = Impact of Event Scale; IES-R = Revised; L = longitudinal; P = prospective; Q = qualitative; R = retrospective.

Authors year, country, and author listing in reference listMethodsReproductive loss, Participants, and control for Prereproductive lossOutcomes measurementsQuality

(a) Characteristics of included studies for miscarriage

(28) Alderman et al. (1998), USA [83]RMiscarriage 19 couples
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(29) Bowles et al. (2006), USA [84]P, LMiscarriage 25
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale

(30) Engelhard et al. (2003a), The Netherlands [54]
Note. This study was chosen over [3337]  because of the largest number of reported participants/reported the most data.
P, LMiscarriage 118
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
Posttraumatic Symptom Scale

(31) Johnson and Puddifoot (1996), UK [85]PMiscarriage 126 men
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(32) Lee et al. (1996), UK [86]P, IMiscarriage 39
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
IES

(33) Rowsell et al. (2001), UK [87]P, IMiscarriage 37
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(34) Séjourné et al. (2010), France [88]P, IMiscarriage 134
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled for PTS
IES-R

(35) Serrano and Lima (2006), Portugal [89]RMiscarriage 30 women and 30 men
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(36) Sham et al. (2010), Hong Kong [90]P, LMiscarriage 161
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
Structural clinical interview for DSM-IV

(37) Walker and Davidson (2001), UK [91]PMiscarriage 40
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
IES

(b) Miscarriage and perinatal/stillbirth/neonatal death

(38) Armstrong (2004), USA [92]PMiscarriage and Perinatal loss 40 expectant couples
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(39) Forray et al. (2009), USA [93]PMiscarriage; perinatal loss/neonatal loss/other complications 76 pregnant women, of which 18 underwent interviews
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
(Modified Clinical administered PTSD Scale (m-CAPS))

(40) Jind (2001), Denmark [94]RMiscarriage/perinatal, stillbirth, and neonatal death/infant loss
602 parents
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES, Harvard trauma Questionnaire

(41) Jind (2003), Denmark [95]P, LMiscarriage, perinatal loss, stillbirth, and neonatal death/infant loss; 93 parents at the first measurement, 65 parents at the second measurement
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire

(42) O‘leary (2005), USA [96]QMiscarriage, perinatal loss, stillbirth and infant loss; 12 expecting mothers and 9 expecting fathers Qualitative Interviews.


Authors year, country, and author listing in reference listMethodsReproductive loss, Participants and control for Prereproductive lossOutcomes measurementsQuality

(a) Perinatal loss

(43) Armstrong et al. (2009), USA [52]
Note. This study was chosen over [29]because it had a higher quality rating.
P, LPerinatal loss 36 couples
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES

(b) Perinatal loss and neonatal death

(44) Hunfeld et al. (1993), Netherlands [57]
Note.This study was chosen over [39, 40] because of a higher quality rating and [38] because of more relevant PTSD data.
P, LPerinatal loss and neonatal death;
46
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
Perinatal Event Scale –adapted from Impact of Event Scale

(45) Hutti et al. (2011), USA [97]P, LPerinatal loss and neonatal death;
106 women
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES


Authors year, country, and author listing in reference listMethodsReproductive loss, Participants and control for Prereproductive lossOutcomes measurementsQuality

(a) Stillbirth

(46) Cacciatore (2007), USA [98]RStillbirth 47
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES-R

(47) Hughes et al. (2002), UK [56]
Note. This study was chosen over [4851] because of the highest quality rating/reported more participants/data.
P65 pregnant women, with prior stillbirth, 60 controls
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically controlled
PTSD-1 Interview

(b) Stillbirth and neonatal death

(48) Uren and Wastell (2002), Australia [99]RStillbirth and neonatal loss; 109 women
Prereproductive loss mental health parameters statistically not controlled
IES-R

As shown in Table 1, 20 studies examined PTS/PTSD after TOP (Table 1(a)); seven examined TOP with miscarriage, perinatal loss, or neonatal death (Table 1(b)). Eighteen reported nonmedical TOP [22, 23, 53, 61, 62, 6476], one nonmedical TOP and medical TOP [77]; eight were medical TOP [5860, 7782]. Table 2 shows 10 studies examining PTS/PTSD after miscarriage (Table 2(a) [54, 8391]), five miscarriages with perinatal loss, stillbirth, and neonatal death (Table 2(b) [9296]). Table 3 shows that one study examined PTS/PTSD after perinatal loss (Table 3(a) [52]) and two studies examined perinatal loss with neonatal death (Table 3(b) [57, 97]). Finally, Table 4 reports two studies investigating PTS/PTSD after stillbirth (Table 4(a) [56, 98]) and one stillbirth with neonatal death (Table 4(b) [99]). No study investigated PTS or PTSD after failed IVF.

Some studies did not distinguish between reproductive types in their data analyses (e.g., [57, 81, 82, 93, 94, 99]) and gestational ages were not reported for studies. The majority of studies used prospective designs, and sample sizes were generally small. PTS was consistently measured () with the Impact of Event Scale (IES), the Revised IES (IES-R), or Perinatal Event Scale-adapted from Impact of Events Scale. The IES includes two subscales, intrusion and avoidance, and the IES-R also includes hyperarousal. Diagnoses of PTSD were done using diagnostic interviews () or questionnaires (). Timing of outcome measurements or time since reproductive loss ranged from immediately after () up to one year postloss (). Most quantitative studies did not control for pre-TOP or prereproductive loss of mental health parameters in their statistical analyses (). Data from 6379 women and men who experienced TOP or reproductive loss and 573 controls were included in the review. The majority of studies were conducted either in Europe () or the USA (), most participants were white, and postloss support in Western countries is likely to be better resourced than in developing countries [8]. The quality of the studies was mostly good. See the Appendix more detailed information on each study.

3.2. Prevalence of PTS and PTSD after TOP and Reproductive Loss

Where more than one type of reproductive loss is reported (), studies are only discussed with the TOP or reproductive loss they are presented with, as demonstrated on Tables 14. Further, only observational studies are presented here; intervention studies (i.e., therapy or TOP procedure type, nonsurgical versus surgical) are discussed later.

3.2.1. Nonmedical TOP

For nonmedical TOP 12.6% met PTSD criteria, similar to rates for women with a prior miscarriage (12.5%) but higher than women without prior reproductive loss (6.3%) [55]. Data from online surveys estimated much higher rates of PTSD (54.9% women and 43.4% of men) up to 15 years after the TOP [22]. However, recruitment was through online resources including abortion support groups suggesting that the sample may not be representative.

Studies from abortion clinics reported moderate levels (19.4%) of PTS at two months post-TOP decreasing over time [66], and few cases of PTSD (1% ) were reported at two years’ post-TOP [23]. Adolescents also report low scores on intrusion four weeks post-TOP (719), and one study reported that PTS was high before TOP but decreased within 5 hours postoperation [65] or reported initially high PTS reducing to “negligible levels of distress” at 3 months post-TOP [64].

No differences between men and women or at 1 and 6 months were found for nonmedical TOP or medical TOP and miscarriage [77]. Before nonmedical TOP, women were less likely to report PTS intrusion than women before miscarriage () and less PTS avoidance at 2 years and 5 years post-TOP compared to post miscarriage [53]. American women (14.3%) are more likely to meet full diagnostic criteria for PTSD compared to Russian women (0.9%) [72].

3.2.2. Medical TOP

Following medical TOP, reports of PTS are high (64.5%) [58], with PTS reducing from 67% to 41% at 12 months. Second trimester medical TOP is more likely to result in PTS at six weeks than first trimester medical TOP but this difference disappeared at 12 months [79]. In a retrospective study of medical TOP, 33% continued to report PTS up to a mean time of 4 years since the loss [59]. Women (44%) report higher rates of PTS than men (21.6%) [60]; pregnant women who had a previous medical TOP are less likely to report PTS than pregnant women with previous miscarriage [78] and significantly lower PTS is reported after medical TOP than perinatal/neonatal death [82].

3.2.3. Miscarriage

One study found that PTSD is infrequently reported three months after miscarriage [90]. Of studies reporting PTS after miscarriage, a reduction is reported after 3 [91] to 4 months [54], although an increase in PTSD over time has also been reported [84]. Other reports find higher levels with 67.9% of pregnant women with prior miscarriage or perinatal loss meeting partial or full criteria for PTSD [93]. Similar high numbers (82% PTS; 80% PTSD) were reported in men and women after miscarriage, perinatal, stillbirth, or neonatal death/infant death three years previously [94]. However, data was not separated for reproductive loss type and the sample was recruited from a support group and may not be representative. Hospital samples record lower numbers (11% with PTSD) which reduced still further (2.8%) 4–12 months follow-up [95].

Women who experienced recurrent miscarriage were more likely to report intrusion [83] or intrusion and avoidance than their partners [89]. Pregnant women who had a previous miscarriage or perinatal loss scored high on avoidance and men scored high on intrusion with 88% of women and 90% of men meeting the cut-off for PTS [92], confirming other reports of clinical levels of PTS in men [85].

3.2.4. Perinatal Loss

PTS is initially high [52, 97] and decreases to moderate levels 8 months postpartum in couples with a history of perinatal loss who subsequently had a healthy infant [52]. Specifically intrusion increased more in women and avoidance remained stable in both [52], or PTS remained high and unchanged from the first diagnosis to three months after delivery/death [57].

3.2.5. Stillbirth

One longitudinal study of 65 pregnant women who had a prior stillbirth reported 21% PTSD in the third trimester and 4% at one year after birth [56].

3.3. Factors Influencing PTS and/or PTSD after TOP and Reproductive Loss
3.3.1. Nonmedical TOP

Having a TOP predicted a diagnosis of PTSD and sociodemographic variables (younger age, poverty, poor education, poor housing, and race), history of sexual trauma, and illness or medical trauma are other risk factors independently predicting PTSD [55]. A history of sexual or medical trauma doubled the risk for PTSD [55], whereas harsh discipline as a child, adult rape, and physical or emotional abuse were associated with PTSD [72], and a history of major depression also predicted PTSD [23]. Peritraumatic dissociation and difficulties in describing feelings were significant predictors of PTS [66].

Relationship stability as a reason to continue the pregnancy is a strong predictor of intrusion symptoms [64]. Couple’s disagreement towards having a TOP and inadequate before abortion counselling significantly predicted PTSD in women and men [22] and in women, knowing others who have not coped with TOP [64], attachment to the foetus, recognition of life, time since abortion, and increased maternal age predicted PTSD [61]. Higher levels of perceived quality in couple’s relationship [77] and active coping influence short term PTS after nonmedical TOP [65]. Spiritual group therapy reduces PTS for women experiencing post-TOP grief, although no control group was used [69] and hypnosis with psychological therapy successfully reduced symptoms of PTSD in a case study [76]. Recurrent thoughts continued to affect and traumatise women’s lives up to 15 years post-TOP in a qualitative study [75].

Research considering type of TOP procedure reporting nonsurgical TOP predicts PTSD [68, 71], surgical TOP is associated with PTS [67], or no differences between nonsurgical or surgical TOP on PTS [72]. No differences between local anaesthesia and intravenous sedation in surgical TOP were reported either [74].

3.3.2. Medical TOP

PTS in women was also predicted by sociodemographic factors [79] (low education, younger maternal age, and advanced gestation) and low levels of partner support [59, 60], whereas, for men, being religious and doubt over decision predicted PTS [60]. PTS is also associated with perinatal grief, depression, and anxiety for pregnant women with prior medical TOP or miscarriage [78]. In women with medical TOP, miscarriage, stillbirth, and neonatal death, recruited through support groups, PTS was correlated with low levels of social support, perinatal grief, emotional pain, emotional expression, and, less strongly, dream frequency [81]. Depression had also been associated with high intrusion scores for women who experienced medical TOP and perinatal loss/neonatal death [82]. Difficult physical symptoms of miscarriage and TOP and having to make the decision to have a medical TOP were experienced as traumatic in a qualitative investigation [80].

3.3.3. Miscarriage

A diagnosis of acute stress disorder [84], peritraumatic dissociation, and neuroticism [54] leads to PTSD one to 4 months after loss. Unplanned pregnancies are significantly related to PTS [91]. Both men and women have clinical levels of PTS although sociodemographic variables and quality of relationship do not predict PTS for either [89]. However, for men, PTS was more likely to be associated with perinatal grief and older gestational age and viewing the ultrasound scan were significantly associated with PTS [85], whereas, for women, viewing scans and early warning signs for miscarriage were not associated with PTS [91]. Psychological therapy to reduce PTS is ineffective; it usually declines spontaneously over time [8688].

Depression, and pregnancy related anxiety, but not prenatal attachment related to PTS in couples with prior miscarriage or perinatal loss [92]. Depression, anxiety, and poly substance disorders cooccurred for some women with full or partial PTSD diagnosis after miscarriage and other reproductive losses [93]. PTSD is also associated with feelings of doubt [94] and attribution of blame [95]. Ultrasound of the current pregnancy triggered flashbacks and symptoms of PTSD for some women with prior miscarriage, perinatal loss, stillbirth, and infant loss [96].

3.3.4. Perinatal Loss

Depression was significantly correlated with PTS during a current pregnancy and eight months following delivery for women and men with prior perinatal losses [52]. For women, anxiety was associated with PTS during pregnancy but, for men, anxiety was associated with PTS during and after delivery [52]. For pregnant women with a history of perinatal loss and neonatal death, intrusion was associated with an increase of women’s healthcare use [97]. For women experiencing a neonatal death, those who delivered early were more likely to experience intrusion than women who delivered after 34 weeks [57].

3.3.5. Stillbirth

At one year postdelivery, seeing and holding the stillborn infant was significantly associated with PTSD in pregnant women with a previous history of stillbirth [56]. Attending support groups significantly predicted lower PTS [98]. Finally, in women who experienced a stillbirth or neonatal death, intrusion and hyperarousal predicted perinatal grief [99].

4. Conclusion

Systematic research evidence on the prevalence of PTS or PTSD associated with failed IVF is nonexistent, and few studies reported on PTS/PTSD following perinatal loss, neonatal death, or stillbirth, usually alongside other reproductive losses. There were more studies on PTS/PTSD after miscarriage and TOP for nonmedical and medical reasons. However, the research is inconsistent with regards to prevalence rates which depended on how participants were recruited. In some cases, no prevalence rates, reproductive loss type, or gestational age of the loss were recorded, reflecting the lack of research into the mental health of patients following reproductive loss [18].

Overall, this review has demonstrated that PTSD occurs after nonmedical and medical TOP, miscarriage, perinatal loss, and stillbirth, although it is much less commonly reported than PTS. Length of gestational age is associated with an increased likelihood for diagnosis of PTS or PTSD. The percentage of PTS and its disorder is highest during the first weeks after TOP or reproductive loss and decreases significantly over time for most but not all women and men. Women generally report more PTS or PTSD symptoms but clinical levels of distress are also reported for men.

Research has generally demonstrated that PTS or PTSD after TOP and reproductive losses are complex and a variety of factors play an influencing role. Studies which have investigated the impact of sociodemographic characteristics (TOP and miscarriage studies) and the experience of other previous traumas on PTS and PTSD have found that demographic factors such as maternal age, gestational age, lower education, and a history of previous physical or sexual trauma are significant risk factors for the development of PTS or PTSD after loss. Prior history of mental health problems and current depression, anxiety, and perinatal grief are also risk factors, confirming previous research [100], although it is not clear if the mental health or the known lack of health seeking behaviour is responsible for the reproductive loss [101]. Time has generally been found to be the most influential protective factor in reducing levels of PTS/PTSD. The evidence for the effectiveness of “individual” psychological therapy is mixed and generally suggest therapy is ineffective at reducing PTS or PTSD anymore than time does by itself. The quality of relationship between the couple has also been found to act as a protective factor, as is found more generally in research reporting coping with reproductive disorders [3].

The quality of studies included in the review was generally good, reaching average scores of 7/9, but the samples are often small, select, and nonrepresentative. Most studies report data for one year after TOP or loss and no inferences can be drawn about the long term consequences. This is a serious limitation because the time since the loss occurred is an important factor that influences PTS and PTSD. Further, most of the studies included did not control for pre-TOP or prereproductive loss mental health in their statistical analyses. This is potentially another significant limitation of existing research because a recent Danish population based cohort study found evidence that the incidence of pre-TOP psychiatric contacts up to 9 months preabortion (14.6%) was similar to the incidence at 12 months post-TOP (15.2%) among the large cohort of girls and women included in the analysis [102]. The lack of research on perinatal loss, stillbirth, and neonatal death is also of concern because a longer gestation predicts an increasing likelihood of PTS or PTSD. Evidence of PTS and reproductive loss of men, nonwhite, single women, adolescent girls, and women past the age of natural childbearing is meagre and nonexistent on failure of infertility treatment needing further attention. Finally, most of the studies that have examined TOP have come from countries that permit nonmedical TOP. Restrictive TOP laws are not associated with lower TOP rates, indeed the opposite appears to be true [13, 14]. Therefore, the findings from this review cannot easily be transferred to those countries where TOP is illegally practiced, particularly where unsafe TOP’s are carried out.

To sum, this systematic review investigated PTS/PTSD after TOP and reproductive loss. The prevalence of PTS was greater than PTSD and both decreased over time. However, the more advanced the pregnancy is, the more PTS and PTSD are likely to be reported. Women generally report more PTS/PTSD but men also report clinical rates of PTS/PTSD. Time since TOP and loss, demographic characteristics and psychosocial factors influence the development and maintenance of PTS and PTSD after TOP and reproductive loss.

Appendix

See Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Conflict of Interests

There are no competing interests.

Funding

Viltė Daugirdaitė received an ERASMUS Internship scholarship.

References

  1. O. B. A. van den Akker, “The psychological and social consequences of miscarriage,” Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 295–304, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. Zegers-Hochschild, G. D. Adamson, J. de Mouzon et al., “International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1520–1524, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. O. B. A. van den Akker, Reproductive Health Psychology, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
  4. A. L. Greil, “Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1679–1704, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. D. Peterson, M. Pirritano, U. Christensen, J. Boivin, J. Block, and L. Schmidt, “The longitudinal impact of partner coping in couples following 5 years of unsuccessful fertility treatments,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1656–1664, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. R. W. Fisher, K. Hammarberg, and G. H. W. Baker, “Antenatal mood and fetal attachment after assisted conception,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1103–1112, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. Bandenhorst and P. Hughes, “Psychological aspects of perinatal loss,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 21, pp. 249–259, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. M. Bennett, B. S. Lee, B. T. Litz, and S. Maguen, “The scope and impact of perinatal loss: current status and future directions,” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 180–187, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. A. Geller, D. Kerns, and C. M. Klier, “Anxiety following miscarriage and the subsequent pregnancy: a review of the literature and future directions,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. A. Bagarozzi, “Identification, assessment and treatment of women suffering from post traumatic stress after abortion,” Journal of Family Psychotherapy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 25–54, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Condon, “Women's mental health: a ‘wish-list’ for the DSM V,” Archives of Women's Mental Health, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5–10, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Iles, “The loss of early pregnancy,” Bailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 769–790, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Sedgh, S. Singh, I. H. Shah, E. Åhman, S. K. Henshaw, and A. Bankole, “Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008,” The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9816, pp. 625–632, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. World Health Organisation (WHO), “Facts on induced abortion worldwide,” April 2014, http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_IAW.html. View at: Google Scholar
  15. N. F. Russo and K. L. Zierk, “Abortion, childbearing, and women's well-being,” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 269–280, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. M. Stanford-Rue, Will I Cry Tomorrow? Healing Post-Abortion Trauma, Fleming H. Revell, 1999.
  17. B. Major, M. Appelbaum, L. Beckman, M. A. Dutton, N. F. Russo, and C. West, “Abortion and mental health: evaluating the evidence,” American Psychologist, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 863–890, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Astbury, “Overview of key issues,” in Mental Health Aspects of Women's Reproductive Health. A Global Review of Literature, pp. 1–7, World Health Organization, 2009, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241563567_eng.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  19. D. Carter, S. Misri, and L. Tomfohr, “Psychologic aspects of early pregnancy loss,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 154–165, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. Lee and P. Slade, “Miscarriage as a traumatic event: a review of the literature and new implications for intervention,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 235–244, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Horsch, “Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth and pregnancy loss,” in Clinical Psychology in Practice, H. Beinart, P. Kennedy, and S. Llewelyn, Eds., pp. 274–287, Blackwell Publishing, West Sussex, UK, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  22. C. T. Coyle, P. K. Coleman, and V. M. Rue, “Inadequate preabortion counseling and decision conflict as predictors of subsequent relationship difficulties and psychological stress in men and women,” Traumatology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 16–30, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Major, C. Cozzarelli, M. L. Cooper et al., “Psychological responses of women after first-trimester abortion,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 777–784, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, pp. 1006–1012, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. J. Horowitz, Stress Response Syndromes, Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ, USA, 2001.
  26. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, USA, 5th edition, 2013, http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx.
  27. J. P. T. Higgins and S. Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2011, http://handbook.cochrane.org/.
  28. J. M. Green, J. Hewison, H. L. Bekker, L. D. Bryant, and H. S. Cuckle, “Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 8, no. 33, pp. 1–128, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  29. D. S. Armstrong, “Perinatal loss and parental distress after the birth of a healthy infant,” Advances in Neonatal Care, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 200–206, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. N. Broen, T. Moum, A. S. Bödtker, and Ö. Ekeberg, “Psychological impact on women of miscarriage versus induced abortion: a 2-year follow-up study,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 265–271, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. N. Broen, T. Moum, A. S. Bödtker, and Ö. Ekeberg, “Reasons for induced abortion and their relation to women's emotional distress: a prospective, two-year follow-up study,” General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 36–43, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. K. Coleman, C. T. Coyle, and V. M. Rue, “Late-term elective abortion and susceptibility to posttraumatic stress symptoms,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2010, Article ID 130519, 10 pages, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. I. M. Engelhard, M. A. van den Hout, and A. Arntz, “Posttraumatic stress disorder after pregnancy loss,” General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 62–66, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. I. M. Engelhard, M. A. van den Hout, and M. Kindt, “The relationship between neuroticism, pre-traumatic stress, and post-traumatic stress: a prospective study,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 381–388, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. I. M. Engelhard, M. A. van den Hout, and J. W. S. Vlaeyen, “The sense of coherence in early pregnancy and crisis support and posttraumatic stress after pregnancy loss: a prospective study,” Behavioral Medicine, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 80–84, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  36. I. M. Engelhard, M. A. van den Hout, and E. G. W. Schouten, “Neuroticism and low educational level predict the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder in women after miscarriage or stillbirth,” General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 414–417, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. A. van den Hout and I. M. Engelhard, “Pretrauma neuroticism, negative appraisals of intrusions, and severity of PTSD symptoms,” Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 181–183, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. A. M. Hunfeld, J. W. Wladimiroff, F. Verhage, and J. Passchier, “Previous stress and acute psychological defence as predictors of perinatal grief—an exploratory study,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 829–835, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. A. M. Hunfeld, J. W. Wladimiroff, and J. Passchier, “Prediction and course of grief four years after perinatal loss due to congenital anomalies: a follow-up study,” British Journal of Medical Psychology, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. A. M. Hunfeld, J. W. Wladimiroff, and J. Passchier, “The grief of late pregnancy loss,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Kersting, M. Dorsch, C. Kreulich et al., “Trauma and grief 2–7 years after termination of pregnancy because of fetal anomalies—a pilot study,” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. Kersting, K. Kroker, J. Steinhard et al., “Complicated grief after traumatic loss: a 14-month follow up study,” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 257, no. 8, pp. 437–443, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. J. Korenromp, G. C. M. L. Page-Christiaens, J. van den Bout et al., “Psychological consequences of termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: similarities and differences between partners,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 1226–1233, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. J. Korenromp, G. C. M. L. Page-Christiaens, J. van den Bout, E. J. H. Mulder, and G. H. A. Visser, “Adjustment to termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a longitudinal study in women at 4, 8, and 16 months,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 160.e1–160.e7, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. B. Major and R. H. Gramzow, “Abortion as stigma: cognitive and emotional implications of concealment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 735–745, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. S. Seng, L. K. Low, M. Sperlich, D. L. Ronis, and I. Liberzon, “Prevalence, trauma history, and risk for posttraumatic stress disorder among nulliparous women in maternity care,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 839–847, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Speckhard and N. Mufel, “Universal responses to abortion? Attachment, trauma, and grief responses in women following abortion,” The Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, vol. 18, pp. 3–7, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  48. P. Turton, W. Badenhorst, P. Hughes, J. Ward, S. Riches, and S. White, “Psychological impact of stillbirth on fathers in the subsequent pregnancy and puerperium,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 188, pp. 165–172, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Turton, C. Evans, and P. Hughes, “Long-term psychosocial sequelae of stillbirth. Phase II of a nested case-control cohort study,” Archives of Women's Mental Health, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Turton, P. Hughes, C. D. H. Evans, and D. Fainman, “Incidence, correlates and predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder in the pregnancy after stillbirth,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 178, pp. 556–560, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. Turton, P. Hughes, P. Fonagy, and D. Fainman, “An investigation into the possible overlap between PTSD and unresolved responses following stillbirth: an absence of linkage with only unresolved status predicting infant disorganization,” Attachment and Human Development, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 241–253, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. D. S. Armstrong, M. H. Hutti, and J. Myers, “The influence of prior perinatal loss on parents' psychological distress after the birth of a subsequent healthy infant,” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 654–666, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. N. Broen, T. Moum, A. S. Bødtker, and Ø. Ekeberg, “The course of mental health after miscarriage and induced abortion: a longitudinal, five-year follow-up study,” BMC Medicine, vol. 3, article 18, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. I. M. Engelhard, M. A. van den Hout, M. Kindt, A. Arntz, and E. Schouten, “Peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress after pregnancy loss: a prospective study,” Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. L. Hamama, S. A. M. Rauch, M. Sperlich, E. Defever, and J. S. Seng, “Previous experience of spontaneous or elective abortion and risk for posttraumatic stress and depression during subsequent pregnancy,” Depression and Anxiety, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 699–707, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. Hughes, P. Turton, E. Hopper, and C. D. H. Evans, “Assessment of guidelines for good practice in psychosocial care of mothers after stillbirth: a cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 360, no. 9327, pp. 114–118, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. A. M. Hunfeld, J. W. Wladimiroff, J. Passchier, M. Uniken Venema-Van Uden, P. G. Frets, and F. Verhage, “Emotional reactions in women in late pregnancy (24 weeks or longer) following the ultrasound diagnosis of a severe or lethal fetal malformation,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 603–612, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Kersting, K. Kroker, J. Steinhard et al., “Psychological impact on women after second and third trimester termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies versus women after preterm birth—a 14-month follow up study,” Archives of Women's Mental Health, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 193–201, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. J. Korenromp, G. C. M. L. Christiaens, J. Van Den Bout et al., “Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: a cross-sectional study,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 253–260, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. J. Korenromp, G. C. M. L. Page-Christiaens, J. van den Bout et al., “A prospective study on parental coping 4 months after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 709–716, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. N. Mufel, A. Speckhard, and S. Sivuha, “Predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder following abortion in a former Soviet Union country,” The Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, vol. 17, pp. 41–61, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  62. P. K. Coleman, C. T. Coyle, M. Shuping, and V. M. Rue, “Induced abortion and anxiety, mood, and substance abuse disorders: isolating the effects of abortion in the national comorbidity survey,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 770–776, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. R. Steinberg and L. B. Finer, “Examining the association of abortion history and current mental health: a reanalysis of the National Comorbidity Survey using a common-risk-factors model,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. Allanson, “Abortion decision and ambivalence: insights via an abortion decision balance sheet,” Clinical Psychologist, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 50–60, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. L. Cohen and S. Roth, “Coping with abortion,” Journal of Human Stress, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 140–145, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. A. A. P. van Emmerik, J. H. Kamphuis, and P. M. G. Emmelkamp, “Prevalence and prediction of re-experiencing and avoidance after elective surgical abortion: a prospective study,” Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 378–385, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. Hemmerling, F. Siedentopf, and H. Kentenich, “Emotional impact and acceptability of medical abortion with mifepristone: a German experience,” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. T. Kelly, J. Suddes, D. Howel, J. Hewison, and S. Robson, “Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13–20weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 1512–1520, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. S. D. Layer, C. Roberts, K. Wild, and J. Walters, “Postabortion grief: evaluating the possible efficacy of a spiritual group intervention,” Research on Social Work Practice, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 344–350, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. L. M. Pope, N. E. Adler, and J. M. Tschann, “Postabortion psychological adjustment: are minors at increased risk?” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. C. Rousset, C. Brulfert, N. Séjourné, N. Goutaudier, and H. Chabrol, “Posttraumatic stress disorder and psychological distress following medical and surgical abortion,” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 506–517, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. V. M. Rue, P. K. Coleman, J. J. Rue, and D. C. Reardon, “Induced abortion and traumatic stress: a preliminary comparison of American and Russian women,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. SR5–SR16, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  73. P. Slade, S. Heke, J. Fletcher, and P. Stewart, “A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy choice, psychological consequences and satisfaction with care,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 1288–1295, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  74. S. Suliman, T. Ericksen, P. Labuschgne, R. de Wit, D. J. Stein, and S. Seedat, “Comparison of pain, cortisol levels, and psychological distress in women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy under local anaesthesia versus intravenous sedation,” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 7, article 24, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Trybulski, “Women and abortion: the past reaches into the present,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 683–690, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. V. J. Walters and D. A. Oakley, “Hypnosis in post-abortion distress: an experimental case study,” Contemporary Hypnosis, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 85–99, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. C. Canário, B. Figueiredo, and M. Ricou, “Women and men's psychological adjustment after abortion: a six months prospective pilot study,” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 262–275, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. F. S. Cowchock, S. E. Ellestad, K. G. Meador, H. G. Koenig, E. G. Hooten, and G. K. Swamy, “Religiosity is an important part of coping with grief in pregnancy after a traumatic second trimester loss,” Journal of Religion and Health, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 901–910, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. V. Davies, J. Gledhill, A. McFadyen, B. Whitlow, and D. Economides, “Psychological outcome in women undergoing termination of pregnancy for ultrasound-detected fetal anomaly in the first and second trimesters: a pilot study,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 389–392, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. R. Fernandez, D. Harris, and A. Leschied, “Understanding grief following pregnancy loss: a retrospective analysis regarding women's coping responses,” Illness Crisis and Loss, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 143–163, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. J. Kroth, M. Garcia, M. Hallgren, E. LeGrue, M. Ross, and J. Scalise, “Perinatal loss, trauma, and dream reports,” Psychological Reports, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 877–882, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. K. A. Salvesen, L. Øyen, N. Schmidt, U. F. Malt, and S. H. Eik-Nes, “Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 80–85, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. L. Alderman, J. Chisholm, F. Denmark, and S. Salbod, “Bereavement and stress of a miscarriage: as it affects the couple,” Omega, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 317–327, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  84. S. V. Bowles, R. S. Bernard, T. Epperly et al., “Traumatic stress disorders following first-trimester spontaneous abortion: a pilot study of patient characteristics associated with these disorders,” Journal of Family Practice, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 969–973, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  85. M. P. Johnson and J. E. Puddifoot, “The grief response in the partners of women who miscarry,” Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 313–327, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  86. C. Lee, P. Slade, and V. Lygo, “The influence of psychological debriefing on emotional adaptation in women following early miscarriage: a preliminary study,” The British Journal of Medical Psychology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 47–58, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  87. E. Rowsell, G. Jongman, M. Kilby, R. Kirchmeier, and J. Orford, “The psychological impact of recurrent miscarriage, and the role of counselling at a pre-pregnancy counselling clinic,” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. N. Séjourné, S. Callahan, and H. Chabrol, “The utility of a psychological intervention for coping with spontaneous abortion,” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 287–296, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. F. Serrano and M. L. Lima, “Recurrent miscarriage: psychological and relational consequences for couples,” Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 585–594, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. K.-H. Sham, M. G.-C. Yiu, and W. Y.-B. Ho, “Psychiatric morbidity following miscarriage in Hong Kong,” General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 284–293, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. T. M. Walker and K. M. Davidson, “A preliminary investigation of psychological distress following surgical management of early pregnancy loss detected at initial ultrasound scanning: a trauma perspective,” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. D. S. Armstrong, “Impact of prior perinatal loss on subsequent pregnancies,” JOGNN—Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 765–773, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. A. Forray, L. C. Mayes, U. Magriples, and C. N. Epperson, “Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in pregnant women with prior pregnancy complications,” Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 522–527, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. L. Jind, “Do traumatic events influence cognitive schemata?” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. L. Jind, “Parents' adjustment to late abortion, stillbirth or infant death: the role of causal attributions,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 383–394, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. J. O'Leary, “The trauma of ultrasound during a pregnancy following perinatal loss,” Journal of Loss and Trauma, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 183–204, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. M. H. Hutti, D. S. Armstrong, and J. Myers, “Healthcare utilization in the pregnancy following a perinatal loss,” MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 104–111, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. J. Cacciatore, “Effects of support groups on post traumatic stress responses in women experiencing stillbirth,” Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 71–90, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. T. H. Uren and C. A. Wastell, “Attachment and meaning-making in perinatal bereavement,” Death Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 279–308, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. K. J. Gold and S. M. Marcus, “The effect of maternal mental illness on pregnancy outcomes,” Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 391–401, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. L. Bonari, N. Pinto, E. Ahn, A. Einarson, M. Steiner, and G. Koren, “Perinatal risks of untreated depression during pregnancy,” Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 726–735, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  102. T. Munk-Olsen, T. M. Laursen, C. B. Pedersen, Ø. Lidegaard, and P. B. Mortensen, “Induced first-trimester abortion and risk of mental disorder,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 4, pp. 332–339, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Viltė Daugirdaitė et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

5822 Views | 3103 Downloads | 31 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.